Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Creator remuneration

Closed Opened 4 Sep 2023 Closed 22 May 2024 8 recommendations 6 conclusions

Where it stands

The inquiry is closed, opened 4 September 2023.

The committee has published 1 report, most recently Fifth Report - Creator remuneration on 10 April 2024.

The government's response

Published 1 November 2024. The deadline was 10 June 2024.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report but sets out a largely evidence-gathering and industry-led approach, with few firm commitments to the legislative or statutory measures the Committee recommended.

  • On a statutory private copying scheme, the government is "not ruling out" a private copying exception and levy, but "further evidence is needed"; the IPO will meet creative industries representatives on strengthening the evidence base.
  • On AI and copyright, the government "intend[s] to proceed carefully but with a degree of urgency" and "hope[s] to announce next steps soon". It does not set the deadline for legislation that the Committee sought.
  • On freelancers, it does not state a position on a Freelancers' Commissioner. A Good Work Review sub-group is "expected to discuss proposals" for one, and the five Good Work proposals are to be implemented "by March 2026".
  • On music streaming, its "current view" is that dialogue and "industry-led action" are best. It is confident the Working Group's membership is adequate and will "adapt the group if it feels it is necessary".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Recommendations and conclusions 14 shown

1: Lack of UK private copying scheme threatens creators' reciprocal payments from abroad.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Revenue from private copying from abroad is an important source of income for creators, remunerating them for the use of their works that is integral to the demand for electronic devices. Not only does a lack of such a scheme in the UK prevent British creators from receiving payments from the domestic market, but it has also put their payments from abroad under threat due to a lack of reciprocity with other countries.

Link to this item · Read this item

2: Introduce statutory private copying scheme with creative industries, safeguarding reciprocal payments from abroad.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend the Government work with the UK’s creative industries to introduce a statutory private copying scheme, which, at minimum, safeguards reciprocal payments from abroad, to be produced within the next twelve months.

Link to this item · Read this item

3: Government's AI working group failed to produce IP code, favouring AI developers.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Despite our previous recommendations that the Government win back the trust of creators regarding their concerns over AI, its working group has not been able to bring forward a code of practice on AI and intellectual property. Although the Government asserted that it could consider legislating were agreement not reached, it has not indicated that it will do so. It is unlikely that simply conducting a further period of engagement with the sectors, with no clarity over its overall aims, will have any meaningful effect. We are concerned that the status quo simply favours AI developers, given creators’ concerns that their IP is already being used in AI development without licence or any practical means of recourse.

Link to this item · Read this item

4: Require Government to establish mechanisms and a legislative deadline for AI creator compensation.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government must ensure that creators have proper mechanisms to enforce their consent and receive fair compensation for use of their work by AI developers. It should set out measurable objectives for the period of engagement with the AI and rightsholders sectors, which it has said ministers will lead on, and provide a definitive deadline at which it will step in with legislation in order to break any deadlock. We will continue to monitor developments in this area and recommend that our successor Committee do the same next year.

Link to this item · Read this item

5: Creative freelancers lack unified voice, leading to declining pay and poor conditions.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Freelancers make up a significant portion of the creative workforce but lack a single clear voice representing their interests to Government. This has resulted in a decline in pay and conditions that will cause long-term harm to the sector.

Link to this item · Read this item

6: Appoint a Freelancers’ Commissioner with cross-departmental oversight to advocate for creative freelancers.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government appoint a Freelancers’ Commissioner, with appropriate powers and cross-departmental oversight, to advocate across Government in the interests of creative freelancers, and of other freelance and self-employed people more broadly.

Link to this item · Read this item

7: Creators experience poor working conditions, inconsistent contracts, and inadequate support.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
Many creators experience poor working conditions, including inconsistent use of contracts and terms and conditions, uneven responses to bullying, harassment and discrimination and a lack of proper support, accounting, training and development. This compounds the poor pay available in the profession and its high barriers to entry.

Link to this item · Read this item

8: Acknowledge and address poor creator working conditions by implementing Good Work Review recommendations.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
The Government should acknowledge and address issues around contracts and working conditions by implementing the recommendations of the DCMS-sponsored Good Work Review, using the sector’s CREATOR campaign as a basis for fair working standards.

Link to this item · Read this item

9: Maintain momentum on music streaming reform using finalised research into creator earnings.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s ongoing commitment to the reset of music streaming which we have advocated and note the recent metadata and transparency codes agreed by the working groups it led. The Government must now maintain this momentum in light of the finalised publications of research into “Music creators’ earnings in the digital era”, “Equitable Remuneration (ER) in the Streaming Age” and “Contract adjustment and Rights reversion”.

Link to this item · Read this item

11: Creator Remuneration Working Group membership gives creators minority voice and excludes producers.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
We welcome the Government’s publication of the terms of reference for the Creator Remuneration Working Group and expect to see tangible steps to improve musicians’ remuneration and performer rights in the next twelve months. However, we note concerns that the group’s membership leaves creators themselves with a minority voice and vote among their peers and that record producers, who are integral to the music making process, are not included.

Link to this item · Read this item

12: Revisit Creator Remuneration Working Group membership to give music makers a stronger voice.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
We recommend that the Government revisit the Creator Remuneration Working Group’s membership, in order to give music makers a stronger and fairer voice over issues of remuneration for the duration of the Group’s timespan.

Link to this item · Read this item

13: Music streaming revenue split does not reflect importance of songwriters and composers.

Conclusion · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Concluded (the committee's words)
The revenue split between recording and publishing rights does not reflect the importance of songwriters, composers and publishers in the music streaming process. We note that the Competition and Markets Authority has also concluded that it is for the Government to determine what is needed to reach an optimal split.

Link to this item · Read this item

14: Require Government to consult on measures incentivising optimal publishing rights rates for creators.

Recommendation · Fifth Report - Creator remuneration · Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Recommended (the committee's words)
Given the contribution of songwriters and composers to the success of music streaming, we recommend that the Government bring forward measures for consultation with fans, music makers and other stakeholders to incentivise an optimal rate for publishing rights in order to fairly remunerate creators for their work.

Link to this item · Read this item

Reports

1 report

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

Date Session and witnesses Source
12 Dec 2023
Oral evidence session
Dr Hyojung Sun, Merck Mercuriadis, Nile Rodgers, Paul Clements · Music Publishers Association, Professor David Hesmondhalgh, VV Brown · The Ivors Academy
View ↗
19 Sep 2023
Oral evidence session
Andrew Harrower · Directors UK, Caroline Norbury OBE · Creative UK, John Hollingworth · British Equity Collecting Society Ltd, Nicola Solomon · Creators’ Rights Alliance, Reema Selhi · Design and Artists Copyright Society, Richard Combes · Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society
View ↗

Who gave evidence

12 witnesses

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.

WitnessOrganisationSessions
Andrew Harrower · Chief Executive Directors UK 1
Caroline Norbury OBE · Chief Executive Creative UK 1
Dr Hyojung Sun Not recorded 1
John Hollingworth · Actor and BECS Member British Equity Collecting Society Ltd 1
Merck Mercuriadis Not recorded 1
Nicola Solomon · Chair Creators’ Rights Alliance 1
Nile Rodgers Not recorded 1
Paul Clements · Chief Executive Music Publishers Association 1
Professor David Hesmondhalgh Not recorded 1
Reema Selhi · Head of Policy and International Design and Artists Copyright Society 1
Richard Combes · Head of Rights and Licensing and Deputy Chief Executive Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society 1
VV Brown · singer-songwriter, record producer and board director The Ivors Academy 1

Correspondence

2 letters

On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.