Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee

Recommendation 30

3rd Report - Protecting built heritage Published 13 Jul 2026 Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We recommend that the government work with Skills England, Historic England and sector bodies to create protected training pathways for endangered heritage crafts, including the specialist skills identified on the Heritage Crafts Red List. It should establish a “heritage skills hub” to promote careers in the heritage sector and provide advice and guidance to those looking for a career. As a first step, within 12 months, the government should formally engage with and build upon existing sector-led mapping of endangered crafts to identify priority skills gaps in training provision. The government should then set out how this assessment has informed the design of targeted interventions, such as funded placements and accredited training routes and report back to this committee within a further 12 months on progress and delivery. (Recommendation, Paragraph 86)

From: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, 3rd Report - Protecting built heritage (HC 144), 13 July 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 16 October 2026 (deadline 9 October 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the report and agrees with many of its aims, but says it is "not proposing to adopt" a heritage-to-housing scheme and "not minded to accept" the national dataset recommendation, pointing instead to existing planning, funding and data arrangements.

  • On housing, it "agrees" heritage regeneration and tackling vacancy are key priorities, but does "not agree" that national policy should require re-use to be prioritised before new build, citing the target of building 1.5 million new homes.
  • On a national heritage dataset, it is "not minded to accept" the recommendation and is "concerned about the feasibility" of gathering and maintaining such information reliably and consistently.
  • On funding, it says it "disagrees" that the National Portfolio Organisation model should be adopted for heritage and does not agree the taxpayer should routinely fund core operating costs, preferring capital grants that help custodians generate their own income.
  • It commits to update the Committee on the Places of Worship Renewal Fund 6 and 12 months from submission of the report, and to "revert to the Committee in September 2028" on measuring heritage outcomes under the revised NPPF.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error