Select committee: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Conclusion 4
3rd Report - Protecting built heritage
Published 13 Jul 2026
Addressed to Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee Protecting built heritage All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Heritage-led housing is no longer a niche or peripheral opportunity, but a major and under-recognised means of addressing the country’s acute housing shortage. Historic England’s estimate that up to 670,000 47 homes could be delivered through the reuse of vacant or under-used heritage buildings is equivalent to almost half of the government’s current housebuilding target. However, the government is failing to prioritise the reuse of heritage buildings in a way that will enable its huge potential to be fulfilled. (Conclusion, Paragraph 18)
From: Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, 3rd Report - Protecting built heritage (HC 144), 13 July 2026
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 16 October 2026 (deadline 9 October 2026).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the report and agrees with many of its aims, but says it is "not proposing to adopt" a heritage-to-housing scheme and "not minded to accept" the national dataset recommendation, pointing instead to existing planning, funding and data arrangements.
- On housing, it "agrees" heritage regeneration and tackling vacancy are key priorities, but does "not agree" that national policy should require re-use to be prioritised before new build, citing the target of building 1.5 million new homes.
- On a national heritage dataset, it is "not minded to accept" the recommendation and is "concerned about the feasibility" of gathering and maintaining such information reliably and consistently.
- On funding, it says it "disagrees" that the National Portfolio Organisation model should be adopted for heritage and does not agree the taxpayer should routinely fund core operating costs, preferring capital grants that help custodians generate their own income.
- It commits to update the Committee on the Places of Worship Renewal Fund 6 and 12 months from submission of the report, and to "revert to the Committee in September 2028" on measuring heritage outcomes under the revised NPPF.