Select committee: Committees on Arms Export Controls

Conclusion 13

First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls Published 28 Oct 2022 Paragraph 50
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We are concerned about the lack of consultation on the new Strategic Export Licensing Criteria. While we note that previous changes to the criteria have not Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls 45 been subject to formal consultation, we believe that the unique circumstances of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU mean that a formal consultation would have been beneficial.

From: Committees on Arms Export Controls, First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls (HC 282), paragraph 50, 28 October 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 9 January 2023 (deadline 9 January 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to the Committees' recommendations by noting some conclusions, committing to specific updates and data, and declining several recommendations, including a post-shipment verification pilot and an independent review of the new Criteria.

  • On LITE, the government says delivery is being progressed "urgently" and "will commit to ECJU providing the Committees with six-monthly updates on progress".
  • On post-shipment verification, it says it "retain[s] an open mind" but "cannot commit to implementing a pilot programme by 2025", citing significant costs, resource and legal, diplomatic and practical issues.
  • On the new Strategic Export Licensing Criteria, it is satisfied they provide a thorough risk assessment framework and "does not consider an independent review to be necessary or proportionate".
  • HMRC "will provide convictions data for export control violations for inclusion in Annual Reports", but says it cannot agree to give the Committees settlement data, even privately.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error