Select committee: Committees on Arms Export Controls

Recommendation 11

First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls Published 28 Oct 2022 Paragraph 41
Recommendation (the committee's words)
We are concerned by evidence regarding insufficient resources within the ECJU, particularly technical and specialist roles and Compliance Officers. The ECJU Transformation Programme should include a review of ECJU resources. Future editions of the Annual Report should include data on ECJU resources including staff levels by grade, post and parent department.

From: Committees on Arms Export Controls, First Joint Report - Developments in UK Strategic Export Controls (HC 282), paragraph 41, 28 October 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 9 January 2023 (deadline 9 January 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to the Committees' recommendations by noting some conclusions, committing to specific updates and data, and declining several recommendations, including a post-shipment verification pilot and an independent review of the new Criteria.

  • On LITE, the government says delivery is being progressed "urgently" and "will commit to ECJU providing the Committees with six-monthly updates on progress".
  • On post-shipment verification, it says it "retain[s] an open mind" but "cannot commit to implementing a pilot programme by 2025", citing significant costs, resource and legal, diplomatic and practical issues.
  • On the new Strategic Export Licensing Criteria, it is satisfied they provide a thorough risk assessment framework and "does not consider an independent review to be necessary or proportionate".
  • HMRC "will provide convictions data for export control violations for inclusion in Annual Reports", but says it cannot agree to give the Committees settlement data, even privately.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error