Select committee: International Relations and Defence Committee

Conclusion 34

1st Report - UK defence policy: from aspiration to reality? Published 12 Jan 2023 Paragraph 223
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We agree with the Government that headline troop numbers are not the most appropriate metric by which to judge the Army’s capabilities. The more important question is whether the Army has the resources and capabilities it needs to deliver on the Government’s ambitions. This depends not only on the number of troops, but also on how well-equipped and trained they are.

From: International Relations and Defence Committee, 1st Report - UK defence policy: from aspiration to reality?, paragraph 223, 12 January 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 11 March 2023 (deadline 12 March 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report but has published a response to only certain recommendations, saying a more detailed response will follow after the Integrated Review update and the Defence Command Paper update.

  • It agrees with the Committee's caution on drawing lessons from Ukraine and that more scrutiny is needed, and says it "must be careful not to rush to definitive lessons".
  • On weapons stocks, it "notes" the Committee's conclusions and cites contracts already placed for replenishment, but says exact stockpile details are classified and "any further commentary would be inappropriate".
  • On inflation and the 3 per cent of GDP marker, it says controls offer "some protection" but "will not cover the full extent of inflationary pressure". Further budget details are to come in the Spring Statement.
  • On the Army, it says that "any specific policy changes to the Army will be announced following the update to the DCP".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error