Select committee: International Relations and Defence Committee

Recommendation 6

1st Report - UK defence policy: from aspiration to reality? Published 12 Jan 2023 Paragraph 62
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Both the Defence Secretary and the Chief of the Defence Staff suggested that the UK’s approach to its own weapons stocks may need to be reviewed in the light of the Ukraine conflict. We agree. As well as replenishing the equipment it has donated to Ukraine, the Government will need to build greater resilience into its own stocks, supply chains, and industrial capacity. We call on the Government to set out its plans in this regard in its response to this report, as a matter of urgency.

From: International Relations and Defence Committee, 1st Report - UK defence policy: from aspiration to reality?, paragraph 62, 12 January 2023

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 11 March 2023 (deadline 12 March 2023).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government welcomes the Committee's report but has published a response to only certain recommendations, saying a more detailed response will follow after the Integrated Review update and the Defence Command Paper update.

  • It agrees with the Committee's caution on drawing lessons from Ukraine and that more scrutiny is needed, and says it "must be careful not to rush to definitive lessons".
  • On weapons stocks, it "notes" the Committee's conclusions and cites contracts already placed for replenishment, but says exact stockpile details are classified and "any further commentary would be inappropriate".
  • On inflation and the 3 per cent of GDP marker, it says controls offer "some protection" but "will not cover the full extent of inflationary pressure". Further budget details are to come in the Spring Statement.
  • On the Army, it says that "any specific policy changes to the Army will be announced following the update to the DCP".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error