Source · Select Committees · Business and Trade Committee

Fourth Report - Liberty Steel and the future of the UK steel Industry

Business and Trade Committee HC 821 Published 5 November 2021
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
42 items (12 recs)

No response data available yet.

Filter by:

Recommendations

12 results
2

We recommend that Ministers reflect on the systemic risks to UK industry posed by such...

Recommendation
We recommend that Ministers reflect on the systemic risks to UK industry posed by such unusual corporate structures and, if deemed necessary, bring forward amendments to the Companies Act. (Paragraph 29) Audit
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
7

We recommend that the Financial Reporting Council, as the competent authority for audit in the...

Recommendation
We recommend that the Financial Reporting Council, as the competent authority for audit in the UK, refer this case to the relevant Recognised Supervisory Body, the Institute of Chartered Accountants for England and Wales, to investigate King & King under … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
9
Para 57

In light of the Greensill Capital collapse and subsequent financial hardship of GFG Alliance and...

Recommendation
In light of the Greensill Capital collapse and subsequent financial hardship of GFG Alliance and Liberty Steel UK, we urge the Government to give consideration to formalising the fit and proper person test for private company directors within any future … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
15
Para 80

We recommend that the Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury investigate the use of, and...

Recommendation
We recommend that the Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury investigate the use of, and accounting rules for, future or prospective receivables.
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
22
Para 119

UK steel producers were already facing some of the highest electricity prices in Europe prior...

Recommendation
UK steel producers were already facing some of the highest electricity prices in Europe prior to recent rises in the wholesale price of gas. Soaring gas prices have since transformed what was a long-standing problem into an immediate crisis. We … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
24
Para 126

If additional support is not forthcoming, high electricity prices will continue to have a pernicious...

Recommendation
If additional support is not forthcoming, high electricity prices will continue to have a pernicious effect on the UK steel industry, resulting in long-term decline and future crises. The Government should set out, following a consultation with industry, what support … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
26

Given that UK steel producers are already facing some of the highest electricity prices in...

Recommendation
Given that UK steel producers are already facing some of the highest electricity prices in Europe and that demand for electricity will only increase as the sector decarbonises, the Government should exempt the steel sector from increased costs arising from … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
28

To ensure full transparency, the Procurement Policy Note (PPN) on steel procurement in major projects...

Recommendation
To ensure full transparency, the Procurement Policy Note (PPN) on steel procurement in major projects should be updated to include a requirement for contracting authorities to provide supply chain plans and publicise supply opportunities for UK steel producers. The Government … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
31

Decisive action should be taken to ensure that UK steel producers do not miss out...

Recommendation
Decisive action should be taken to ensure that UK steel producers do not miss out on the Government’s ambitious infrastructure programme. Setting minimum UK steel content targets for major public projects would serve as an important first step to improving … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
35
Para 176

We found broad agreement that the UK should retain a primary steelmaking capacity rather than...

Recommendation
We found broad agreement that the UK should retain a primary steelmaking capacity rather than push its emissions and business abroad, a point recognised in the Government’s own Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy. However, if the Government is serious about its emissions … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
37
Para 186

The Government should commit to a pilot of hydrogen-based steel production in the UK as...

Recommendation
The Government should commit to a pilot of hydrogen-based steel production in the UK as part of its industrial decarbonisation strategy. Funding for the project should be sought in partnership with interested steel businesses or backed in part by the … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
42

We call on Ministers to establish a new Sector Deal for the steel industry.

Recommendation
We call on Ministers to establish a new Sector Deal for the steel industry. The Sector Deal should address long-running challenges to the sector’s competitiveness as part of a cohesive plan for decarbonising the industry. It should set out a … Read more
Department for Business and Trade
View Details →

Conclusions (30)

Observations and findings
1 Conclusion
Para 28
The corporate structure and governance of GFG Alliance companies resulted in no formal oversight or accountability of the decisions taken by Sanjeev Gupta. Mr Gupta put members of his staff in an unacceptable position by employing them with job titles associated with traditional executive functions in well run companies, without …
View Details →
3 Conclusion
Para 44
We were not reassured by the evidence presented by King & King and note the legal restrictions placed upon Mr Patel, and other auditors who had previously audited GFG Alliance companies, by Sanjeev Gupta.
View Details →
4 Conclusion
Para 45
Despite public statements over a number of years to the contrary, we see, as yet, no tangible evidence that Sanjeev Gupta and GFG Alliance companies are making improvements to corporate governance or improving transparency through the publication of consolidated accounts.
View Details →
5 Conclusion
Para 49
We found it utterly unconvincing, and do not believe that King & King had the capacity, expertise, or resources to audit the accounts of multiple large GFG Alliance and Liberty Steel UK companies representing over £2.5 billion of revenue.
View Details →
6 Conclusion
Para 50
The reputation of Liberty Steel UK has been threatened by the poor audit and accounting practices of GFG Alliance, including the changing of accounting deadlines and its inability to produce consolidated accounts. As these accounts are yet to be published it is difficult to see the true financial picture of …
View Details →
8 Conclusion
Para 56
We commend the Government’s decision to reject GFG Alliance’s request for £170 million of financial support in March 2021. The Secretary of State was correct to be cautious about providing a large grant to a group of companies with a centralised, complex and opaque governance structure.
View Details →
10 Conclusion
Para 60
We note the recent developments within GFG Alliance and Liberty Steel UK and welcome the injection of capital at Liberty Steel’s Rotherham plant. However, we note that once again Sanjeev Gupta has decided to set up an additional corporate entity to provide financial support to Liberty Steel UK companies without …
View Details →
11 Conclusion
Para 61
We would welcome the Insolvency Service considering whether, on the basis of the evidence we have received, Sanjeev Gupta may have acted in breach of his fiduciary duties as a company director in the United Kingdom.
View Details →
12 Conclusion
More broadly, we believe that until Mr Gupta restructures his GFG Alliance companies into a more acceptable corporate structure and publishes consolidated accounts that are adequately audited, that he fails to fulfil the criteria that we believe should be applied to define a fit and proper person for the purposes …
View Details →
13 Conclusion
Para 78
The way in which future, or prospective, receivables operated between GFG Alliance and Greensill Capital is disputed by both parties. We note that several claims have been made about the use of future receivables and their relation to “suspect invoices” and welcome the Serious Fraud Office’s investigation into this matter.
View Details →
14 Conclusion
Para 79
Steel is a foundational industry in the UK and in need of significant structural reform. The use of high-risk financial funding practices, such as future receivables lending, that Greensill Capital and GFG Alliance engaged in are barriers to such reforms. By his use of such practices Mr Gupta, the so-called …
View Details →
16 Conclusion
GFG Alliance’s reported engagement in circular trading, or REPO structures, exacerbated a concentration risk to Greensill Capital by raising large amounts of working capital against invoices created to raise finance instead of selling steel to genuine customers. (Paragraph 86) 64 Liberty Steel and the Future of the UK Steel Industry
View Details →
17 Conclusion
We did not receive evidence that the use of circular trading between companies is a systemic issue, but note the potential criminal liability associated with the worst examples of financial engineering between businesses. Despite repeated reassurances from GFG Alliance, we remain unconvinced by Sanjeev Gupta’s attempts to re- structure and …
View Details →
18 Conclusion
Para 102
We note that concerns were raised by HM Treasury and shared with BEIS about GFG Alliance and Wyelands Bank during the accreditation process of Greensill Capital to the CLBIL scheme.
View Details →
19 Conclusion
Para 103
We recognise that the subsequent level of interest from the BEIS Department about the accreditation of Greensill Capital was “unusual” but we are confident that this did not impact the approval process and the British Business Bank’s decision remained independent. Given the potential impact of the financial position of Greensill …
View Details →
20 Conclusion
However, the collapse of Greensill Capital and its impact on Liberty Steel UK highlights the fragility of the sector in the UK more generally and raises far reaching and fundamental questions for the Government to consider in terms of how it should work with the industry to secure a sustainable, …
View Details →
21 Conclusion
Para 115
High electricity prices are hindering the ability of UK steel producers to compete on the international market and are a deterrent to inward investment. If the Government is serious about decarbonising the steel industry, it must first recognise the severity of the challenge energy prices pose to steel companies in …
View Details →
23 Conclusion
Para 125
We recognise that decisions on how and whether to compensate industry for the costs of electricity will, by necessity, have implications for consumers and other network users. However, it is clear that current electricity costs for UK steel Liberty Steel and the Future of the UK Steel Industry 65 producers …
View Details →
25 Conclusion
Para 131
When implemented, the Targeted Charging Review has the potential to burden UK steel producers with costs exceeding relief provided to the sector as an energy intensive industry. We note that despite this decision having a potentially significant impact on UK steel producers it has been left entirely to Ofgem without …
View Details →
27 Conclusion
Para 141
Despite advances made since the publication of the Procurement Policy Note in 2015, UK steel producers are still encountering challenges when competing for and securing public contracts. Much of this is due to an opaque and informal approach taken to steel procurement by contracting authorities and action is needed from …
View Details →
29 Conclusion
Para 146
High-quality data will be essential for monitoring and improving compliance with steel procurement policy. However, this data is currently incomplete with only partial data being reported by Government Departments and Arm’s Length Bodies. We welcome the work of the Steel Procurement Taskforce in working to improve the quality of this …
View Details →
30 Conclusion
Para 147
A requirement should be set for all Government projects, including steel contracts awarded by the Contracts for Difference scheme and Highways England, to fully report on the value and origin of their steel requirements.
View Details →
32 Conclusion
Para 158
Given that global steel markets continue to be heavily distorted by state subsidisation and that the EU and the US continue to apply tariffs on imported steel, the UK requires a response from Government regarding potential trade divergence towards UK markets and significant injury to UK steel producers.
View Details →
33 Conclusion
We share the concerns expressed to us that the Trade Remedies Authority’s recommendation to revoke safeguards on nine categories of steel imports was not based on an open dialogue with industry and had therefore missed the wider impact its decision would have had on UK steel producers. These concerns also …
View Details →
34 Conclusion
Para 175
There is a clear lack of direction with respect to the future of the nation’s blast furnaces both within the Government and in industry. A range of options exist for the decarbonisation of primary steelmaking, including carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, or a mixture of technologies running in parallel. …
View Details →
36 Conclusion
Para 185
We identified enthusiasm from many witnesses for the use of hydrogen direct reduced iron as a technology well-suited to decarbonising the UK steel industry. However, as with other potential solutions, it is a technology that remains untested at scale. A pilot of hydrogen-based steel production in the UK would help …
View Details →
38 Conclusion
Previously used steel, also known as scrap, will play a central role in efforts to decarbonise the UK steel industry. The high availability of scrap in the UK represents a valuable resource which is under-utilised, and a range of measures will be needed to ensure that the recycling of scrap …
View Details →
39 Conclusion
Para 196
Many of the challenges facing the UK steel industry today are long-running and have led to crises in the past. Without fundamental reform of energy pricing and a clear decarbonisation strategy, the sector will fail to attract much needed investment and continue on a path of accelerating decline. The Government’s …
View Details →
40 Conclusion
Para 199
A successful transition to net zero will be dependent on addressing the wider challenges and opportunities facing the UK steel industry. These issues will need to be tackled as part of a broader, strategic approach to decarbonisation.
View Details →
41 Conclusion
The steel industry has faced a number of crises in recent years but action to support the sector has been taken on a mostly ad hoc, reactive basis. The sector cannot continue to lurch from crisis to crisis and action is needed now if the UK is to retain a …
View Details →