Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Recommendation 27

Fourth Report - Liberty Steel and the future of the UK steel Industry Published 5 Nov 2021 Paragraph 141 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Despite advances made since the publication of the Procurement Policy Note in 2015, UK steel producers are still encountering challenges when competing for and securing public contracts. Much of this is due to an opaque and informal approach taken to steel procurement by contracting authorities and action is needed from the Government to make this process more transparent. Furthermore, a lack of transparency in steel supply chains together with an absence of explicit guidance on how social and environmental considerations should be applied has meant that broader objectives are being missed. Public procurement of steel has the potential to deliver wider benefits and further action is needed to ensure that the full value offered by UK steel producers is taken into account when supplying steel into public projects.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Fourth Report - Liberty Steel and the future of the UK steel Industry (HC 821), paragraph 141, 5 November 2021

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 20 January 2022 (deadline 5 January 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to the committee's report by engaging with many recommendations, stating it recognises the importance of the steel sector, while declining to comment in detail on matters under live investigation and stating that UK steel content targets would breach its international obligations.

  • On corporate structures, the government "agrees that those structures should not be a legal barrier to proper scrutiny" and "is considering whether" to let ARGA investigate cases of exceptional public interest as part of its planned reform of audit and corporate governance.
  • On the Insolvency Service, BEIS has asked it to work with the Serious Fraud Office to review available information "to determine if it is appropriate" for it to undertake an investigation.
  • On minimum UK steel content targets for public projects, the government states that such targets or measures favouring UK suppliers "constitutes a breach of the UK's international obligations" under the Agreement on Government Procurement.
  • On a steel Sector Deal, the government does not commit to one; it says it will continue working with the Steel Council and "will carefully consider" the Council's recommendations once it sees its report.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error