Source · Select Committees · Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Third Report - Post Office and Horizon redress: Instruction to deliver

Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee HC 477 Published 7 March 2024
Government response
Fourth Special Report - Post Office and Horizon redress: Instruction to deliver: Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report · published 9 May 2024
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index

Recommendations & Conclusions

3 items
2 Recommendation
Para 8

Remove Post Office from redress delivery and establish an independent intermediary for sub-postmasters.

Recommendation
The Government must immediately remove the Post Office from any involvement in delivering redress for sub-postmasters and the Government should set out to the Committee how it proposes to deliver swift and effective redress for sub-postmasters, and in what legally binding timeframes. We repeat the Committee’s recommendation that the Government set up a properly resourced independent intermediary to assist sub-postmasters seeking to overturn convictions and seek compensation across all redress schemes. This intermediary should provide claimants with access to forensic accountants and legal experts who can offer advice to help ensure that claims are robust as possible, that offers take account of all the losses suffered and that claimants do not suffer significant detriment because records have not been kept by the Post Office or other relevant organisations.

Link to this item

Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
3 Recommendation
Para 14

Introduce legal timeframes in legislation to deliver sub-postmaster redress and simplify evidential requirements.

Recommendation
To correct the abject failure to deliver timely redress for sub-postmasters, the Government must include in its forthcoming legislation legal timeframes to deliver redress to sub-postmasters. Those targets should include binding timeframes for each stage of a compensation claim, with financial penalties awarded to the claimant for failure to meet those deadlines. To accelerate the submission of claims, the Government must review and radically simplify the evidential requirements of the claims process, especially in relation to medical impact, consequential loss and repetitional damage.

Link to this item

Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
4 Recommendation

Require Post Office full disclosures and introduce independent appeals mechanism for sub-postmasters.

Recommendation
To ensure that offers of redress are fast and fair, the Government must: (Paragraph 16) a) Require full disclosures by the Post Office of the information needed to submit full and fair claims within legally binding timeframes; b) publish a standardised tariff of damages to help sub-postmasters claim the full amount to which they are entitled; c) remove the cap on legal expenses for sub-postmasters to contest their claims; d) allow those who have already settled under the Horizon Shortfall Scheme to revisit their claims to ensure that they have received fair redress; and e) introduce a legally binding independent appeals mechanism. (Paragraph 16) Post Office and Horiion redresss Instruction to deliver 9

Link to this item

Department for Business and Trade
View Details →
Report Status
Response document linked

Recorded deadline: 7 May 2024

Missing links do not establish that no response was published. A linked document does not verify responses to individual findings.

Conclusions & Recommendations
3 items (3 recs)

No response data available yet.