Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Recommendation 21

10th Report – US Economic Prosperity Deal Published 14 Sep 2025 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Any future digital trade provisions negotiated under the Economic Prosperity Deal should strike a careful balance: promoting AI adoption and cross-border collaboration to strengthen the Western technological 55 alliance, while safeguarding intellectual property, ensuring fair taxation, and enabling the development of sovereign UK AI capabilities. (Recommendation, Paragraph 116)

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 10th Report – US Economic Prosperity Deal (HC 1306), 14 September 2025

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 28 November 2025 (deadline 14 November 2025).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government's response sets out its work on the Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD) and states that discussions with the US on the full scope of the deal are continuing, without stating that it accepts or rejects the Committee's recommendations as a whole.

  • On parliamentary scrutiny and a Commons debate, the government states that it "will continue to keep the House fully informed" and that any final EPD agreement "will be scrutinised by Parliament in line with established procedures". It does not set out a timetable or commit to a debate.
  • On steel and aluminium, it says the UK "will remain the only country in the world to benefit from a preferential 25% rate" and commits to publishing its steel strategy "by the end of this year".
  • On the Trade Remedies Authority, the government is "seeking to introduce legislation as soon as parliamentary time allows", with further details "in due course".
  • On forced labour, it says it is "actively examining" existing measures and "considering" approaches including mandatory due diligence and import controls, as part of a review of responsible business conduct.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error