Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Recommendation 16

12th Report - UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Published 21 Jan 2026 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Recommendation (the committee's words)
Concerns about remaining barriers to trade undermining UK exports to India despite the Agreement are well-founded. The Government should publish utilisation data for tariff preferences under the Agreement, consistent with its approach for other UK free trade agreements, and report regularly to Parliament on uptake. In doing so, it should explain where utilisation is lower than expected, including where this reflects the complexity or restrictiveness of rules of origin under this Agreement. (Recommendation, Paragraph 99)

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 12th Report - UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (HC 996), 21 January 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 17 April 2026 (deadline 21 March 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to each recommendation mainly by describing existing structures and its approach to implementation, with a few stated commitments to update Parliament, publish data and monitor the agreement.

  • On utilisation data, it will "endeavour to publish provisional data" within the first year after entry into force, "subject to information provision from Indian customs", and will update Parliament regularly.
  • On mutual recognition of professional qualifications, it says this is "ultimately the decision of the regulators", but it "will seek to actively facilitate" such arrangements where they are of mutual interest.
  • On the Responsible Business Conduct review, it will "update Parliament when the review is complete"; on labour market impacts, it says DBT "intends to monitor and evaluate the agreement".
  • On debates, it "reaffirms" its commitment to provide a debate on any new trade deal during the statutory scrutiny period "where Parliamentary time allows".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error