Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 13

12th Report - UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) Published 21 Jan 2026 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The absence of a concluded bilateral investment treaty means that greater certainty for investors remains an ambition rather than a secured outcome. Ministers should set to the work of creating an ambitious compelling vision for the potential of a BIT to help re-energise these talks. (Conclusion, Paragraph 84) Implementation challenges

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, 12th Report - UK-India Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) (HC 996), 21 January 2026

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 17 April 2026 (deadline 21 March 2026).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government responds to each recommendation mainly by describing existing structures and its approach to implementation, with a few stated commitments to update Parliament, publish data and monitor the agreement.

  • On utilisation data, it will "endeavour to publish provisional data" within the first year after entry into force, "subject to information provision from Indian customs", and will update Parliament regularly.
  • On mutual recognition of professional qualifications, it says this is "ultimately the decision of the regulators", but it "will seek to actively facilitate" such arrangements where they are of mutual interest.
  • On the Responsible Business Conduct review, it will "update Parliament when the review is complete"; on labour market impacts, it says DBT "intends to monitor and evaluate the agreement".
  • On debates, it "reaffirms" its commitment to provide a debate on any new trade deal during the statutory scrutiny period "where Parliamentary time allows".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error