Source · Select Committees · Business and Trade Committee
Recommendation 28
28
Deferred
Paragraph: 122
We found consensus from across the sector that the Government should bring forward legislation to...
Recommendation
We found consensus from across the sector that the Government should bring forward legislation to increase the frequency of the Renewables Obligation payments. We ask the Government to set out the reasons for repeated delay and failure in this area in its response to this report.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government states this is a matter for government.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference:
122
Government Response
Deferred
HM Government · verbatim extract
Deferred
BEIS acknowledges that responses to the 2021 joint BEIS/Ofgem consultation [https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/renewables-obligation-ro-addressing-electricity-supplier-payment-default-under-the-ro-scheme] indicated a preference for addressing supplier payment default through a requirement for suppliers to settle their obligation more frequently than the current annual arrangement. However, responses to that consultation were in many cases conflicting. There were some concerns about negative effects on some suppliers and there was also support for Ofgem introducing measures via the supplier licence. Some respondents showed support for a combination of a legislative and licenced-based approach, or for continuing unchanged with existing policy. In addition, since the launch of the consultation in August 2021, the energy market had changed significantly, with many suppliers exiting the market following a spike in gas prices. As the market had changed so much, BEIS needed to take time to consider the wide range of complex issues affecting the market and to consider the Renewables Obligation scheme in the round. BEIS did not consider that immediate action to introduce a legislative requirement for more frequent settlement was the right approach. Without careful design, it could have had unintended consequences, such as restricting competition in the supply market or adversely impacting the support received by generators. BEIS believes that a more fundamental change to a fixed price certificates system may offer a better solution.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗