Source · Select Committees · Business and Trade Committee

Recommendation 18

18 Deferred Paragraph: 87

Reduced tidal stream funding ringfence may damage UK marine energy advantage.

Recommendation
We agree that the Government should seek to maximise the renewable opportunities afforded by the UK’s geography, including the potential benefits of tidal energy. Unlike offshore wind, tidal stream projects have not benefited from stable subsidies to bring their costs down. The Government’s recent decision to reduce the tidal steam ringfence from £20 million to £10 million in the upcoming round of Contracts for Difference scheme may damage the UK’s first-mover advantage in marine energy and increase project costs. However, we recognise that support must provide value for money for taxpayers.
Government response summary AI-generated
The government's response discusses developing a business model for power BECCS and setting GHG thresholds, completely ignoring the recommendation about tidal energy funding.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Paragraph Reference: 87
Government Response Deferred
HM Government · verbatim extract Deferred
34. In setting the amount of ringfenced funding for tidal stream for AR5, the Government has had to consider various factors, including the dynamics of funding within the overall pot for all the pot technologies. The minima for tidal stream allows tidal stream projects first to access up to £10m out of the total Pot 2 budget of £35m. Tidal stream projects are protected in this way from competition from other technologies in the pot. 35. Furthermore, the minima has been set at a level that still strives to achieve a balance between factors including deployment and cost to consumers. Further information on how the rules guiding how the minimum will operate within the allocation process is set out in the Draft Allocation Framework. 36. The Government continues to assess the merits of setting a long-term target of tidal stream deployment, and recognises the role tidal stream power could play in helping the UK to achieve net zero. 37. With respect to tidal range, the Government recognises the need to provide tailored subsidy mechanisms for intergenerational assets with long construction times like tidal range, one of which may be a longer-term CfD or a regulated asset base model. Of course, any proposed tidal range schemes would need to demonstrate strong evidence of value for money in the context of other low-carbon technologies inclusive of life span and costs of decommissioning, as well as details of its associated energy system benefits and environmental impact mitigation strategies before the Government could take a view on its potential, or on the funding models appropriate for exploration.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗