Select committee: Financial Services Regulation Committee

Conclusion 16

1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate Published 6 Feb 2025 Paragraph 114
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Our key concern following the publication of the first consultation was that the FCA had not found an acceptable balance between realising the potential benefits of increasing transparency to help prevent consumer harm, and managing the potential risks to firms, individuals and market stability. The revised proposals contained in CP24/2 Part 2, in particular the inclusion of a consideration of the ramifications of an announcement on firms and the markets, and the improved mechanisms for allowing firms more time to make representations to the FCA, correct some significant gaps in the original consultation.

From: Financial Services Regulation Committee, 1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate, paragraph 114, 6 February 2025

Government response

No government response is linked to this report.