Select committee: Financial Services Regulation Committee

Conclusion 11

1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate Published 6 Feb 2025 Paragraph 78
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We remained unconvinced by the explanation offered by the FCA on how the proposals align with its secondary international competitiveness and growth objective. The FCA should carefully consider the ways in which its proposals might adversely impact its secondary objective before it proceeds with implementing any changes to its enforcement regime.

From: Financial Services Regulation Committee, 1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate, paragraph 78, 6 February 2025

Government response

No government response is linked to this report.