Select committee: Financial Services Regulation Committee

Conclusion 4

1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate Published 6 Feb 2025 Paragraph 39
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We are still unclear why—if there is an immediate risk of consumer harm—it would not be considered an ‘exceptional circumstance’ which would demand disclosure of an investigation.

From: Financial Services Regulation Committee, 1st Report - Naming and shaming: how not to regulate, paragraph 39, 6 February 2025

Government response

No government response is linked to this report.