Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Sixteenth Report - Progress in remediating dangerous cladding

Public Accounts Committee HC 406 Published 16 September 2020
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
25 items (13 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 25 of 25 classified
Accepted 15
Accepted in Part 4
Acknowledged 4
Not Addressed 2
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Sixteenth report from Session 2019-21 · published 18 Nov 2020
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
1 Conclusion Not Addressed

On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...

Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (the Department) about the remediation of dangerous of cladding on high-rise buildings.1
Government Response Summary
The government response is entirely irrelevant to the committee's introductory statement about taking evidence on cladding, discussing NHS and social care matters instead.
HM Treasury
View Details →
6 Conclusion Not Addressed

In a review commissioned jointly by the Department and the Home Office in the wake...

Conclusion
In a review commissioned jointly by the Department and the Home Office in the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire, Dame Judith Hackitt found that the building regulatory system was “not fit for purpose” to protect high-rise buildings.16 While the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response provided is entirely unrelated boilerplate text about the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster and historical PAC report statistics, failing to address the committee's conclusion on building safety.
HM Treasury
View Details →