Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Fifth Report - Local economic growth

Public Accounts Committee HC 252 Published 8 June 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
27 items (12 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 27 of 27 classified
Accepted 4
Accepted in Part 2
Acknowledged 15
Not Addressed 4
Rejected 2
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifth report from Session 2022-23 · published 2 Sep 2022
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
12 Recommendation Rejected

We questioned the Department on whether the way in which it was awarding funding might...

Recommendation
We questioned the Department on whether the way in which it was awarding funding might mean some areas missed out multiple times across the various funding pots while others were given several opportunities to get funding.31 The Department explained that … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the implied recommendation to change the funding award process to prevent areas from missing out, defending its robust decision-making process and ministerial discretion to ensure a fair spread of Levelling Up Fund allocations. It does, however, commit to providing information on the balance of successful and unsuccessful bids by theme and geography.
HM Treasury
View Details →
13 Recommendation Rejected

We reminded the Department that when we reported previously on the Towns Fund we had...

Recommendation
We reminded the Department that when we reported previously on the Towns Fund we had raised concerns over the opacity over some of its decision making.34 In November 2020, we reported that the selection process for awarding the Towns Fund … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the committee's implied recommendation for new safeguards against political influence, defending its robust decision-making process for the Levelling Up Fund and the necessity of ministerial discretion for wider considerations. However, it commits to providing information on the balance of successful and unsuccessful bids by theme and geography to enhance transparency.
HM Treasury
View Details →