Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Fifty-Second Report - Restoration & Renewal of the Palace of Westminster – 2023 Recall

Public Accounts Committee HC 1021 Published 17 May 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
34 items (2 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 34 of 34 classified
Accepted 21
Accepted in Part 2
Acknowledged 2
Deferred 7
Not Addressed 2
Filter by: Clear

Conclusions (2)

Observations and findings
32 Conclusion Accepted in Part
There is currently no formal process in place should the Clerks be requested to do something they felt did not align with their respective responsibilities. For example, the Clerks cannot overrule the restoration and renewal Client Board or the Programme Board, but retain accountability for any decisions taken (whether or …
Government Response Summary
The Clerks agree with the conclusion, noting existing limited processes for disagreement and stating that in significant disagreements concerning the R&R works, they would formally record their disagreement in Board minutes and correspondence, rather than implementing a ministerial direction equivalent.
View Details →
33 Conclusion Accepted in Part
The Clerk of the House of Commons suggested that where there was a real abuse of procedure, there would be value to him being able to put this on record through placing a letter in the Library. He mentioned how the Speaker of the Commons recognised the value of introducing …
Government Response Summary
The government clarifies that an equivalent of a ministerial direction for Corporate Officers would be of limited value, but states they would record significant disagreements in formal Board minutes and correspondence for both Houses.
View Details →