Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Seventy-Sixth Report - The Asylum Transformation Programme

Public Accounts Committee HC 1334 Published 27 October 2023
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
23 items (8 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 23 of 23 classified
Accepted 14
Not Addressed 2
Rejected 7
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Seventy-sixth report from Session 2022-23 · published 14 Feb 2024
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
13 Conclusion Not Addressed

Home Office business case lacks broad assessment of economic and departmental impacts of increased decisions.

Conclusion
While the Programme aims to increase the number of asylum decisions that the Home Office makes, the Home Office acknowledged that it has not looked broadly enough at benefits and costs beyond the asylum and protection team of increasing decisions.33 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it will not publish the Programme’s Business Case, as it is not standard practice, but offers a private meeting to explain how impacts were modelled once HM Treasury approval is received.
HM Treasury
View Details →
19 Conclusion Not Addressed

Home Office fails to provide clarity on financial savings from asylum hotel room-sharing.

Conclusion
The Home Office explained that, as a way to limit the number of hotels it is using, it will accommodate more people in each hotel by increasing the amount of room-sharing.55 It told us that it had so far increased … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the committee's observation, reiterating its plan to reduce reliance on hotels by optimising existing use, increasing room sharing, and delivering alternative accommodation, stating it has begun closing over 50 hotels. It does not provide the specific savings figures requested by the committee.
HM Treasury
View Details →