Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Twenty-First Report - Levelling up funding to local government
Public Accounts Committee
HC 424
Published 15 March 2024
Recommendations
2
Accepted
Set out lessons learned to ensure timely success and application to future levelling up funds.
Recommendation
We are concerned the Department did not do enough to understand the readiness of project proposals and the challenges facing local authorities before it awarded funds. As we have found before, optimism bias has put impactful bids to the Levelling …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and outlines implemented measures to ensure timely project success, including a project adjustment request process, funding for capacity, and reducing complexity through the Funding Simplification Doctrine. It also highlights the shift away from competition in Levelling Up Fund and the greater flexibility of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund and Long-Term Plan for Towns.
HM Treasury
View Details →
5
Accepted
Set out lessons learned from focused local support work and disseminate to all authorities.
Recommendation
The Department is providing focused support to some local authorities with project delivery, but it remains to be seen how the Department will use any learning from these activities to support all local authorities. In addition to the flexibilities introduced …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it already disseminates lessons through its Delivery Associate Network, which provides group learning, webinars, newsletters, and a 'Knowledge Hub' website for all local authorities. It also commits to using lessons learned from support offers and evaluations to inform the design of future capacity and capability support.
HM Treasury
View Details →
8
Accepted
Optimism bias and unrealistic timescales cause significant delays in levelling-up projects.
Recommendation
Our report in 2022 on Local Economic Growth found there was an optimism bias in expectations for Round 1 of the Levelling Up Fund.14 The recent NAO report found that the Department’s monitoring reports are showing that projects are behind …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and states the recommendation is implemented, having prioritised proposals from places confident of quick starts and requiring robust delivery plans. It has implemented programme-wide measures for managing costs and improving flexibility, including a Project Adjustment Request process, capacity funding, simplified funding through the Funding Simplification Doctrine, and new non-competitive approaches for some funds.
HM Treasury
View Details →
9
Accepted
Repeated deadline extensions granted for Levelling Up and Future High Streets Fund projects.
Recommendation
We asked for assurance that Round 1 projects of the Levelling Up Fund would be able to spend their government funds by the 31 March 2024 deadline. The department told us that it had provided flexibility to local authorities and …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and states the recommendation is implemented, having prioritised quick-start projects and provided flexibility for deadlines. It has implemented programme-wide measures including a Project Adjustment Request process, capacity funding, and simplified funding through the Funding Simplification Doctrine, and has introduced greater flexibility in the UK Shared Prosperity Fund and the Long-Term Plan for Towns.
HM Treasury
View Details →
10
Accepted
Project delays attributed to inflation, supply chain issues, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Recommendation
We challenged the Department about whether allowing local authorities to extend the deadline to spend government funds for all projects in the Future High Street Fund and Rounds 1 and 2 of the Levelling Up Fund was a sign that …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges economic factors caused project delays and states it has already implemented programme-wide measures, including greater flexibility via a project adjustment request process, funding for capacity building, and reduced complexity through the Funding Simplification Doctrine.
HM Treasury
View Details →
11
Accepted
Competitive bidding for Levelling Up Funds creates burdensome 'begging bowl' culture for councils.
Recommendation
Evidence we received from the South East Councils told us that the bidding process for funds had led to a ‘begging bowl’ culture where Councils were required to spend too much time and money to meet ever-changing demands of ministers, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the recommendation, stating it is moving to a simpler, more streamlined funding system. It has implemented a Funding Simplification Doctrine with four principles for new funding to local government and moved away from competition for Levelling Up Fund Round 3.
HM Treasury
View Details →
19
Accepted
Department's learning from pathfinder pilots and project flexibility remains in "early days".
Recommendation
During our evidence session we questioned the Department about how local authorities were supported to deliver their projects and what it is learning from this.49 As part of its simplification plans the Department told us it has allowed ten local …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it has reflected on lessons learned from pathfinder pilots and is moving towards a simpler funding system. It commits to publishing an interim evaluation of the pilot by year-end and a full evaluation in 2026.
HM Treasury
View Details →
20
Accepted
Department's 'discovery team' provides targeted support to 25 local authorities at risk of missing deadlines.
Recommendation
The Department said it had locally-based area teams who knew their local authorities and can provide support across all the funding sources they may be accessing.53 We asked about support for local authorities who were struggling. The Department told us …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states that the Delivery Associate Network, launched in January 2024, provides expert delivery support to local authorities. It commits to using lessons learned from this and other engagement to inform the design of future capacity and capability support by Summer 2025.
HM Treasury
View Details →
22
Accepted
Department developing robust evaluation plans for local growth after prior criticism.
Recommendation
In our report on Local Economic Growth, we were critical of the Department for not yet having developed the promised overarching monitoring and evaluation framework for local growth.58 The Department told us that, in response to recommendations from the Committee, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states it has robust plans to measure long-term impact, with a target implementation date of December 2025. It has published evaluation strategies and feasibility studies for key local growth programmes and is commissioning external experts for further methodological work.
HM Treasury
View Details →
Conclusions (9)
4
Conclusion
Accepted
We welcome the intentions to simplify the funding system, but the Department has more to do to implement its plans. The Department published its plans for funding simplification in Summer 2023. This plan covers the whole of government and aims to simplify the approach to, and number of, funding streams …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees, confirming the Funding Simplification Doctrine is published and in force, with an interim evaluation of the pilots due by year-end and a full evaluation in 2026. It describes improvements to fund management, but will not quantify costs and benefits due to disproportionate burden, nor explicitly commit to six-monthly updates by letter.
6
Conclusion
Accepted
We recognise the Department’s plans to evaluate these funds in the short-term, but we are concerned it has no long-term plans to measure the impacts. The Department is playing catch up in its efforts to carry out robust evaluation. Having previously not considered evaluation well enough, it is now putting …
Government Response Summary
The government confirms its evaluation strategies are publicly available, citing published feasibility and scoping studies for various funds. It details its approach to ensuring robust data, including building spatial data and commissioning external experts for impact evaluation, with reports to be published for transparency.
1
Conclusion
Accepted
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities (the Department) about three significant levelling-up grants to local government.1
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the committee's foundational observation, and in response, provides detailed statistics on the distribution and spending of Levelling Up Funds, Towns Fund, and UK Shared Prosperity Fund, including the number of projects underway or completed.
17
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department published its plans for funding simplification in Summer 2023. The plan covers the whole of government and aims to simplify the number of separate funding streams available to local authorities.42 The Department told us it has introduced several practical and concrete ways to make the system more responsive …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion regarding funding simplification, setting an implementation date of April 2025. It confirms that all ten pathfinder pilots have been agreed, the Funding Simplification Doctrine published, and provides timelines for interim and full evaluations of the pilot.
18
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department told us that there are a lot of delegated flexibilities. For example, local authorities can move money between years, without seeking approval from the Department.45 The NAO reported that part of the simplification plan was to allow local authorities to make changes within individual programmes up to a …
Government Response Summary
The government confirms its implementation of programme-wide measures for flexibility, including the Funding Simplification Doctrine and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund. It commits to continue improving funds and speeding up decision-making for Project Adjustment Requests by allowing S151 Officers to verify value for money.
21
Conclusion
Accepted
In addition to the support already mentioned, the Department told us it had an additional £65 million of funding to provide further support to local places and procure expert support. The funds were split across: £6 million for Delivery Associates; £38 million in direct grant support to local areas; £11 …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees, describing the existing Delivery Associate Network which provides expert support to local authorities. It commits to use lessons learned from the overall support offer to inform the design of future capacity and capability support by Summer 2025.
23
Conclusion
Accepted
We questioned the Department on its approach to evaluation.60 The NAO had reported that the Department had published its overarching evaluation strategy in November 2022.61 The NAO report said the Department was behind where it wanted to be with the procurement of its evaluation work, so we asked the Department …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion regarding its approach to evaluation and progress on procurement, setting a target implementation date of December 2025. It reaffirms its plans for long-term impact measurement, detailing published evaluation strategies, feasibility studies, data requirements, and the use of external experts, asserting that these plans are clearly set out and represent significant improvement.
24
Conclusion
Accepted
We were interested to hear how the Department was going to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the £10.47 billion total that is being spent. It told us that there was always a balance, when doing place-based interventions, as to the timing of when you do them versus waiting for the …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion regarding the need for comprehensive evaluation of spending, setting a target implementation date of December 2025. It asserts that it already has clear plans for long-term impact measurement, detailing published evaluation strategies, feasibility studies, data requirements, and the use of external experts for robust evaluation.
25
Conclusion
Accepted
We asked the department whether it had a plan to use publicly available data to have a snapshot review at different points, for example five, ten or 15 years after a project had concluded, so that the department could continue the learning about what works. The Department told us it …
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's conclusion that it should have a plan for long-term project review and states a target implementation date of December 2025. It clarifies that it believes existing evaluation strategies and published studies already incorporate plans to measure long-term impact for local growth programmes, including data requirements and commissioning external experts.