Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

16th Report - Whole of Government Accounts 2022-23

Public Accounts Committee HC 367 Published 19 March 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
33 items (4 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 31 of 33 classified
Accepted 28
Not Addressed 1
Rejected 2
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations

1 result
19 Not Addressed

Require MHCLG to always seek explanations for late local authority accounts.

Recommendation
We also expressed concern as to whether MHCLG has the tools necessary to ensure local authorities produce audited accounts in future in line with the various backstop deadlines. MHCLG replied that, though backstop requirements are statutory, in the event a … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response states it disagrees that MHCLG lacks sufficient oversight but does not address the specific recommendation for MHCLG to always ask for explanations regarding late local authority accounts.
HM Treasury
View Details →

Conclusions (2)

Observations and findings
13 Conclusion
The Treasury told us that it was providing £45 million of funding to MHCLG to support local authorities in purchasing audit services. It confirmed that such funding was to address where audit costs have risen faster than fees paid.27 We challenged the Treasury and MHCLG about whether it would need …
View Details →
14 Conclusion
The Treasury and MHCLG also described other measures that they think will resolve the local authority audit issues. Beyond the backstop and additional funding, MHCLG said it is working to simplify the financial reporting requirements for local authorities, as the current level of complexity is, in MHCLG’s view, a barrier …
View Details →