Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

28th Report - Decommissioning Sellafield

Public Accounts Committee HC 363 Published 4 June 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
32 items (9 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 31 of 32 classified
Accepted 28
Acknowledged 2
Not Addressed 1
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty-eighth report from Session 2024-26 · published 18 Sep 2025
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
13 Conclusion Not Addressed

Major project delays and costs at Sellafield significantly escalated since 2018 due to poor planning.

Conclusion
When it last took evidence on Sellafield, the previous Committee was told that major project delivery was improving.32 The NDA told it that “cost forecasting is improving” while the Department said that “for the first time now, the estimates of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response does not directly address the committee's finding of increased costs and delays for major projects, instead citing a 2024 NAO report that noted positive progress in more recent projects and praised the Programme and Project Partners model.
HM Treasury
View Details →
28 Conclusion

Geological Disposal Facility project experiences significant delays and slow progress.

Conclusion
The NDA also needs to construct a ‘Geological Disposal Facility’ (‘GDF’) to store waste permanently – including that currently at Sellafield. This project is still at a very early stage: it needs to drill boreholes before it can even start … Read more
HM Treasury
View Details →