Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 3
8th Report - Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage
Published 7 Feb 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Department and HM Treasury have yet to assess the full financial impact of the CCUS programme on taxpayers and consumers. The costs of the CCUS programme are significant: in November 2024 the government announced £21.7 billion of funding over 25 years to cover only the first five CCUS projects. There are three more projects that are still under negotiation as part of Track 1, an unquantified number of additional projects that are expected to join the HyNet and East Coast clusters as part of Track 1 expansion, and all the projects that will join the Track 2 clusters at Peterhead and Humberside. The Department has not indicated the likely cost of these projects. The Department and HM Treasury expect that around 75% of the cost of supporting these early projects will be met by levies on consumers who are already facing significant financial pressures, with the remainder funded by the Exchequer. Drawing on a recent report from the National Energy System Operator (NESO), the Department has concluded that supporting the deployment of CCUS in gas–fired power stations offers lower costs compared to alternatives. But NESO also concluded that this approach would require more upfront financial support. The Department has not looked at the likely financial impact on bills of the full CCUS programme at a time when households are already facing high energy prices. recommendation The Department and HM Treasury should assess whether the full CCUS programme will be affordable for taxpayers and consumers, given wider pressures on energy bills and costs of living. 5
From: Public Accounts Committee, 8th Report - Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (HC 351), 7 February 2025
Government response
Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighth Report of Session 2024-26
The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighth report from Session 2024-25
Published 6 May 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government states that it agrees with the Committee's recommendations across the areas covered, while saying that for annual reappraisal of value for money its process is "ongoing, dictated by the project pipeline, rather than a fixed annual schedule".
- On annual reappraisal of value for money, the government says it agrees with the recommendation but reviews the approach "primarily" via the Business Case process, ahead of final investment decisions, and not on a fixed annual schedule.
- The government acknowledges that the 2030 ambition of capturing and storing 20-30 million tonnes of CO2 per year "is no longer achievable", and will publish a report setting out its plan to meet carbon budgets, with a target implementation date of Spring 2025.
- On BECCS, biomass sustainability criteria "will be developed" for any future support, and the department "plans to consult later this year" on a common biomass sustainability framework. Target implementation date: Summer 2025.
- On sharing financial benefits, the government notes the business models already have mechanisms, such as a "gainshare" mechanism in the Net Zero Teesside agreement, and will "continue to evolve" them. Target implementation date: December 2026.