Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 2

8th Report - Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage Published 7 Feb 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
While the Department is taking steps to incentivise efficient delivery of the CCUS projects, it has not established mechanisms to make sure that taxpayers and consumers will benefit financially should the programme be successful. The Department has developed a range of business models for applying CCUS to a range of sectors. The models form the basis of negotiations between the Department and the private sector 4 and outline how risks will be allocated between the different parties and set the payment mechanism. While the projects will receive the bulk of taxpayer and consumer support only when they are operational, the sums involved are substantial. Should the programme be successful, projects might eventually earn significant profits that are partly a result of early public support. Neither of the two contracts that the Department has already signed include any provision for the government to share profits or take an equity stake, or for consumers to benefit from lower energy bills should things go well. Nor does the Department seem to have considered any such ‘gainshare’ mechanisms when negotiating with the Track 1 projects. recommendation For all future CCUS projects, the Department should introduce mechanisms to make sure taxpayers and consumers benefit financially from the success of the projects they have supported financially.

From: Public Accounts Committee, 8th Report - Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (HC 351), 7 February 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighth Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighth report from Session 2024-25

Published 6 May 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government states that it agrees with the Committee's recommendations across the areas covered, while saying that for annual reappraisal of value for money its process is "ongoing, dictated by the project pipeline, rather than a fixed annual schedule".

  • On annual reappraisal of value for money, the government says it agrees with the recommendation but reviews the approach "primarily" via the Business Case process, ahead of final investment decisions, and not on a fixed annual schedule.
  • The government acknowledges that the 2030 ambition of capturing and storing 20-30 million tonnes of CO2 per year "is no longer achievable", and will publish a report setting out its plan to meet carbon budgets, with a target implementation date of Spring 2025.
  • On BECCS, biomass sustainability criteria "will be developed" for any future support, and the department "plans to consult later this year" on a common biomass sustainability framework. Target implementation date: Summer 2025.
  • On sharing financial benefits, the government notes the business models already have mechanisms, such as a "gainshare" mechanism in the Net Zero Teesside agreement, and will "continue to evolve" them. Target implementation date: December 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error