Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 26
26
HS2 Ltd fails to monitor total spending on environmental mitigation schemes.
Conclusion
HS2 Ltd does not monitor how much in total it spends on environmental mitigation. For example, we asked HS2 Ltd how much it was spending on wildlife migration schemes such as for the great crested newt at Halse Copse. In its follow–up letter, HS2 Ltd told us that it was not able 38 Qq 15–16, 18; Letter from DfT on cost breakdown of the HS2 bat mitigation structure at Sheephouse Wood, dated 31 January 2025 39 Qq 15–16, 18 40 Q 18; Letter from DfT on cost breakdown of the HS2 bat mitigation structure at Sheephouse Wood, dated 31 January 2025 41 Qq 15–16, 18 42 Q 16 43 Letter from DfT on cost breakdown of the HS2 bat mitigation structure at Sheephouse Wood, dated 31 January 2025 16 to provide that information as the provision and maintenance of habitat migration forms part of ‘integrated work packages’ and HS2 Ltd had set no requirement in these contracts to segregate the cost of mitigation schemes.44
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 16 May 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗