Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 22
22
Ensure environmental legislation requirements do not disproportionately increase major public infrastructure project costs.
Recommendation
We challenged the Department on the balance in legislation that needs to be taken between meeting environmental obligations and costs, raising the example of the £100 million cost of a protective ‘bat tunnel’.36 In order to mitigate HS2’s impact on nearby bat habitats, the Sheephouse Wood Bat Protection Structure is being constructed near Calvert in Buckinghamshire. The structure will be a combination of concrete arches and mesh inserts and around 1km in length and up to 10m high.37 The Department explained that under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the Habitats and Species Regulations 2017 and the International Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, HS2 Ltd was legally required to mitigate the damage or harm to protected species, such as the bats that lived in the area of that section of railway. Both the Department and HS2 Ltd told us that they understood the public concern over the cost of the 32 Q 30 33 Qq 40–41 34 Qq 40–41 35 Q 43 36 Qq 15–16, 18 37 HS2 Ltd, Sheephouse Wood Bat Protection Structure Information Boards, October 2022 15 structure but emphasised that it was a considerable engineering structure, built to last 120 years.38 We note that the enabling legislation for both Phase 1 and 2a passed ahead of the Environment Act 2021 which required developers to achieve a 10% biodiversity net gain. Government will need to ensure that these legislative requirements do not lead to decisions which disproportionately add to the cost of major public infrastructure projects resulting in poor value for money.
Government Response
A response document is linked to this report, dated 16 May 2025. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗