Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 24

13th Report - Improving educational outcomes for disadvantaged children Published 7 Mar 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Department told us it monitors how well school leaders use pupil premium evidence, with 69% of school leaders saying they used EEF resources in its most recent survey.79 It believed this may be understated, as a higher proportion of the pupil premium statements it reviewed linked back to EEF evidence.80 Although it described 70% as a reasonable proportion of school leaders, the Department acknowledged this figure should be closer to 100% and that 30% of schools potentially not using evidence was worrying. It committed to looking at this.81 The Department noted that the EEF is keen to make sure schools have access to the latest evidence, and that this can be easily shared and adopted in classrooms.82 71 Q 24 72 Q29 73 IEDO0005, IEDO0007, IEDO0015, IEDO0017, 74 Q 32 75 C&AG’s Report, para 3.6 76 Qq 7, 24, 25 77 C&AG’s Report, para 16, Para 3.6 78 Q 55 79 Qq 37, 55 80 Qq 37, 59–60 81 Qq 55, 60 82 Q 37 16

From: Public Accounts Committee, 13th Report - Improving educational outcomes for disadvantaged children (HC 365), 7 March 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirteenth Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirteenth report from Session 2024-25

Published 16 May 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government disagrees with the Committee's recommendation on setting out gap-narrowing targets and agrees with its recommendations on funding evidence, early years evidence, school spending data, support for evidence-based decisions and the Opportunity Mission.

  • On setting three, five and ten year gap-narrowing goals, the government disagrees, stating that "Impact will be measured through attainment at the end of secondary school" and that progress is "already closely monitored" through published data.
  • It agrees to re-assess the evidence for funding decisions, with a target date of September 2025. A review of the schools national funding formula "will inform decisions on the NFF and pupil premium for 2026-27" onwards.
  • On school spending data, it agrees (target December 2027) and is "reviewing options" to improve pupil premium reporting, including "potential digital solutions by Academic Year 2027-28".
  • On early years evidence, it agrees (target April 2026) and says it will work with the Education Endowment Foundation to monitor the impact of the Early Years Pupil Premium uplift through an independent evaluation.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error