Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 6
18th Report - Use of AI in Government
Published 26 Mar 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Use of AI in Government All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
Realising the benefits of AI across the public sector will require strong leadership from DSIT. Addressing the skills shortage, tackling the persistent issues with poor data quality and out–of–date technology, and providing the support and guardrails the public sector needs to build public trust and adopt AI safely and responsibly all require a clear strategy and strong leadership. In its report, the NAO raised concerns about unclear accountabilities and limited integration of governance across Cabinet 7 Office—which was primarily responsible for AI adoption in the public sector, through CDDO, i.AI and the Government Digital Service (GDS)— and DSIT, which held responsibility for wider AI policy. We welcome the move of CDDO, GDS and i.AI to DSIT in 2024 to create a digital centre of government. This new Government Digital Service, and the proposals in A blueprint for modern digital government to require all executive teams and boards to include a digital leader by 2026, offer an opportunity to strengthen leadership and governance and support digital transformation. However, the scale of the task should not be underestimated and we are seriously concerned whether DSIT has sufficient leverage to drive change across the public sector. One significant way to do this is to ensure that every department and their agencies have a senior Government Digital Service officer embedded at senior management levels in their organisation and agencies to oversee digital policy and procurement change. Equally the relevant procurement and main boards should include people with excellent digital policy and procurement skills. recommendation a. DSIT must ensure that the proposed Government Digital and AI Roadmap is underpinned by a clear implementation plan with: • clear accountabilities at the centre, across government and the wider public sector • delivery milestones to drive change and maintain momentum • metrics to track progress and spend over time, to identify whether further levers
From: Public Accounts Committee, 18th Report - Use of AI in Government (HC 356), 26 March 2025
Government response
Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth Report of Session 2024-26
The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth report from Session 2024-26
Published 18 September 2025.
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth report from Session 2024-25
Published 10 July 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government states that it agrees with each of the Committee's recommendations, setting target implementation dates between October 2025 and June 2026.
- On legacy technology, it agrees and says GDS will define "consistent metrics and methods" to measure the ongoing costs of legacy systems and the estimated cost of failing to remediate or replace them, with a target date of January 2026.
- On transparency, it is "aiming to publish" Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard records for all currently identified in-scope tools in government departments (not including arm's-length bodies) "by the end of 2025".
- On digital skills, it agrees and says all executive committees will be required to include digital leaders and boards to appoint digital non-executive directors "by 2026", with further detail in the forthcoming Government Digital and AI Roadmap.
- On scaling AI pilots, it agrees and says a proposal is "currently being developed" in the Public Sector AI Adoption programme, with a target implementation date of May 2026.