Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Recommendation 5
18th Report - Use of AI in Government
Published 26 Mar 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Use of AI in Government All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
DSIT and Cabinet Office have a long way to go to strengthen government’s approach to digital procurement to ensure value for money and a thriving AI supplier market. The technology market is rapidly evolving with a shift from upfront capital purchases to subscription–based models, and greater consolidation of the supply chain. Technology suppliers, charities and academics have raised concerns with us that the dominance of a small number of large technology suppliers in the AI market risks stifling competition and innovation. We also heard concerns that government procurement approaches are ill–suited to a dynamic, fast–paced market, increasing risks to value for money from vendor lock–in and the inability to adapt and take advantage of rapid technological development. The government is aware it has a lot to do to adapt its procurement approach to keep up with the pace of change in the sector, and to leverage its significant buying power. It has committed to setting up an AI sourcing and procurement framework, including rapid procurement and national tenders where appropriate. It has also confirmed it will establish a digital commercial centre of excellence to deepen its expertise. The success of these measures will be critical if we are to see a vibrant AI market in the UK and value for money in the procurement of AI for the public sector. recommendation DSIT, in collaboration with Cabinet Office, should set out publicly how its proposed AI sourcing and procurement framework will: • get the best from all suppliers in a market dominated by a small number of global technology companies and ensure opportunities are available for small suppliers • align with the overarching digital technology sourcing strategy (on how government builds, buys and partners) that the Blueprint for modern digital government promises • leverage government’s spending power to achieve value for money for citizens • Ensure those taking procurement decisions across government have access to the
From: Public Accounts Committee, 18th Report - Use of AI in Government (HC 356), 26 March 2025
Government response
Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth Report of Session 2024-26
The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026.
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth report from Session 2024-26
Published 18 September 2025.
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Eighteenth report from Session 2024-25
Published 10 July 2025.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government states that it agrees with each of the Committee's recommendations, setting target implementation dates between October 2025 and June 2026.
- On legacy technology, it agrees and says GDS will define "consistent metrics and methods" to measure the ongoing costs of legacy systems and the estimated cost of failing to remediate or replace them, with a target date of January 2026.
- On transparency, it is "aiming to publish" Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard records for all currently identified in-scope tools in government departments (not including arm's-length bodies) "by the end of 2025".
- On digital skills, it agrees and says all executive committees will be required to include digital leaders and boards to appoint digital non-executive directors "by 2026", with further detail in the forthcoming Government Digital and AI Roadmap.
- On scaling AI pilots, it agrees and says a proposal is "currently being developed" in the Public Sector AI Adoption programme, with a target implementation date of May 2026.