Select committee: Public Accounts Committee

Conclusion 13

32nd Report - The Future of the Equipment Plan Published 20 Jun 2025 Addressed to HM Treasury
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Department has responded to these lessons by splitting its procurement into three segments. The top segment consists of large strategic programmes that provide long-term platforms, such as submarines, ships and aeroplanes. The second segment is for developing capabilities and systems that the Department will deploy on those platforms. The third segment, based on the UK’s support for Ukraine, is the rapid development and deployment of inexpensive, innovative capabilities.23

From: Public Accounts Committee, 32nd Report - The Future of the Equipment Plan (HC 716), 20 June 2025

Government response

Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty-second Report of Session 2024-26

The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 20 August 2025).

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Thirty-second report from Session 2024-26

Published 16 September 2025.

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government agrees with five of the Committee's recommendations on Ukraine support, procurement reform, the Strategic Defence Review and annual reporting, and disagrees with the recommendation on detailed Defence Nuclear Enterprise cost reporting in the annual update.

  • On Ukraine, the government agrees with the recommendation and states that the department will support Ukraine "for as long as it takes", expecting to provide £4.5 billion in capability support this financial year.
  • It agrees to update the Committee by June 2026 on procurement lessons from Ukraine and on how procurement has improved under the National Armaments Director Group, with a target to agree key performance indicators "within the next three months".
  • It agrees to turn the Strategic Defence Review into a Defence Investment Plan, to be published in the autumn, which the department "will ensure" is affordable, and says it will provide updates "as requested by the Committee".
  • It disagrees on Defence Nuclear Enterprise reporting, saying it is "better" to provide the financial information within wider MOD financial reporting, and is "continuing to consider" an earlier proposal for a new scrutiny committee.

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error