Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 4

4

Public confidence is likely to be further undermined without an open and honest debate about...

Recommendation
Public confidence is likely to be further undermined without an open and honest debate about current capacity and tangible plans to address gaps, for example, in testing and PPE. Government has had to and will continue to have to make quick decisions with sometimes imperfect information as the pandemic develops. Yet too often the basis for decisions or changes, such as on PPE, has been unclear; sometimes seemingly based upon what the system could cope with, rather than clinical advice and ‘what was right’, and at other times without regard to the reality on the ground. On PPE, guidance was changed 40 times without consulting service providers, leading to confusion on the ground. There has been a lack of transparency around the availability and supply of PPE, and a tendency for Government to over- promise and under deliver. After squandering the opportunity to build up supplies in January and February, it remains to be seen whether the Department can meet its intention to have a 90-day PPE stockpile. Testing for COVID-19 is vital for controlling the virus and informing and assuring the public. It will be essential as ‘track and trace’ is rolled out, yet testing capacity was insufficient for much of the pandemic and, as highlighted by the UK Statistics Authority, public reporting has been inconsistent and lacking transparency. Recommendation: Among other measures, the Department should assess the capacity it needs, particularly for PPE and testing, and how it will meet this, to 8 Readying the NHS and social care for the COVID-19 peak cope with a second peak; and report transparently and consistently on progress. It should write to the Committee by September 2020 with further details of its assessment and plans.
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 18 November 2020. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗