Select committee: Public Accounts Committee
Conclusion 5
54th Report - Afghanistan Response Route
Published 14 Nov 2025
Addressed to HM Treasury
Public Accounts Committee Afghanistan Response Route (ARR) All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Conclusion (the committee's words)
The Department did not put in place a mechanism to accurately identify and account for the costs of resettling individuals who were at high risk due to the data breach. The Department accounted for the costs of the ARR within its total spending on Afghan resettlement schemes, rather than identifying them separately, arguing that this was necessary to avoid breaching the terms of super-injunction. The Department now acknowledges that it could, in anticipation of the super-injunction being lifted and the resulting parliamentary scrutiny, have accounted for the costs of the ARR separately. Many elements of the ARR and the pre-existing ARAP, such as flights and accommodation, were the same and so it should have been perfectly possible for the Department to determine the costs of each scheme. The Department estimates that the ARR scheme—the additional programme put in place as a direct result of the data breach—will cost around £850 million in total, with around £400 million spent by July 2025. This estimate does not include legal costs, or the potential cost of future compensation claims against the Department from affected individuals. The Department has so far been unable to provided sufficient evidence to give the NAO confidence in its estimate. The Department anticipates being able to give the NAO more detailed information on costs as part of its next report on the Afghanistan resettlement schemes overall. 5 recommendation In its Treasury Minute response to this report, the Department should explain how it is ensuring that the resettlement costs related to the ARR are now being captured separately and accurately in its accounting system. 6 Managing personal information and the risk of a data breach Introduction
From: Public Accounts Committee, 54th Report - Afghanistan Response Route (HC 1391), 14 November 2025
Government response
Latest Treasury Minutes progress report to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-fourth Report of Session 2024-26
The government responded to the whole report on 4 June 2026 (deadline 14 January 2026).
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-fourth report from Session 2024-26
Published 19 January 2026.
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government agrees with four of the Committee's recommendations, including six-monthly updates on ARR resettlement from March 2026, and disagrees with the recommendation on separately capturing ARR costs.
- On updates, the government agrees to write to the Committee every six months from March 2026 until the ARR is complete, though it "may not always be possible to provide a precise breakdown by scheme".
- On the case working system, it agrees, stating the recommendation is implemented and that DACS (introduced in May 2022) addressed "many of the vulnerabilities", with the department "equipped with the right tools to minimise the risk" of a recurrence.
- On scrutiny, it agrees and gives a target date of Spring 2026. The Treasury will issue a Dear Accounting Officer letter on sharing information with the Comptroller and Auditor General in the event of a super-injunction.
- It disagrees on separate ARR costing, saying this would be "disproportionately complex and resource intensive", and instead offers an indicative cost allocation at the end of each financial year, included with the six-monthly updates.