Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 30

30

The Department told us that it did not think that ELM’s focus on environmental management...

Conclusion
The Department told us that it did not think that ELM’s focus on environmental management would result in the UK importing more food. It explained that the scheme was also designed to boost productivity so that, despite taking land out of production to deliver environmental benefits, farmers can produce more food from the remaining land. It said that this would potentially free up some land to convert to forestry without the need to import any more food. This was echoed by the RSPB, which told us that delivering environmental benefits could also support long-term viable farming and directly improve farm businesses through increased yield. The Department said that there was nothing in its approach or programme that suggested that in 10 years’ time the UK would be importing more food.83
Government Response

A response document is linked to this report, dated 1 March 2022. Response attribution to this conclusion has not been verified. Read the response document ↗