Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 6

6

We are concerned that the Department’s approach to monitoring the skills and experience of academy...

Conclusion
We are concerned that the Department’s approach to monitoring the skills and experience of academy leaders, and the lack of remedial action for leaders of failing academies, risks further failures across the sector. The Education & Skills Funding Agency’s monitoring and intervention activities are designed to consider the effectiveness of governance arrangements within academy trusts. However, there is no requirement for trustees to hold financial qualifications, even where these individuals sit on a trust’s finance or audit committee. The number of instances where the independent auditor found some element of income or expenditure may have been incurred outside permitted use, or instances where the trust’s internal procedures have not been complied with, has risen to 9% of trusts in 2019/20, in part driven by the impact of the pandemic on the internal controls of academies and their spending. The Secretary of State has used its ?her powers under Section 128 of the Education and Skills Act 2008 against 10 individuals, suggesting quite a high threshold for debarring directors of academy trusts. There is a risk that the powers available to the Department do not go far enough to prevent leaders 8 Academies Sector Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 of failing academy trusts from moving elsewhere within the education system. We remain concerned that the Department does not have a sufficiently joined up approach to dealing with misconduct, monitoring the potential re-deployment of leaders of failing academies within the education sector, or capturing insights from poor performance across the sector. Recommendation: The Department should write to the Committee within 6 months detailing how it will better identify and address cases of failed leadership within academies. This should include how it will ensure the necessary lessons are learned to avoid similar incidents from occurring in future elsewhere in the sector. Academies Sector Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 9 1 D
Government Response Not Addressed
HM Government Not Addressed
6.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: September 2022 6.2 There is already a robust regime in place for prohibiting unsuitable individuals from participating in the management of independent schools, including academies. The government will also be making regulations under section 19(7)(c) of the Skills and Post-16 Education Act 2022 to prevent trust leaders judged to be unfit from moving to elsewhere in the education system. Where an individual is currently subject to a direction prohibiting them from participating in the management of an independent school they are also excluded from accessing a range of ESFA funding in accordance with the published Funding higher risk organisations and subcontractors policy. 6.3 In that document, the department has continued to improve its mechanisms for assessing the risk of trust failure. Furthermore, the Schools White Paper sets out plans for the better regulation of trusts, including a set of statutory standards underpinned by new intervention powers. The White Paper announced the launch of a regulatory review in May 2022 looking at all aspects of trust accountability and regulation. In conducting the review, the department will have regard to the issues raised by the Committee. The department will write to the Committee by September 2022 with a full response. 30