Recommendation 14

Following EU Exit there is already some divergence in regulatory approach between the UK and EU. The regulators gave us examples where divergence was happening or could happen due to differences in opinion on what the evidence said or how this related to the UK. For example, the CMA told us that it had taken the decision to block a global merger of companies that sell equipment for container shipping which has been conditionally cleared by the European Commission, and that its decision had been accepted.41 The FSA explained that the EU recently banned titanium dioxide as a food additive, while the UK has not introduced a ban. FSA is carrying out its own risk assessment, as the UK committee on toxicity is not convinced that a ban is necessary.42 FSA explained that its consideration of risk would also take into account the specific consumption patterns in Great Britain, which could be different to those in Europe. As an illustration, the FSA explained that because children in Britain drink more orange squash than in the EU, the FSA might therefore come to a more cautious view on what additives were allowed in squash.43