Source · Select Committees · Public Accounts Committee

Recommendation 2

2 Accepted

Develop better understanding of deterrent effect of compliance work and monitor prosecution revenue benefits.

Recommendation
HMRC does not expect to prosecute as many people for tax evasion as it did before the pandemic. HMRC prosecuted far fewer cases during the pandemic than before 2020. It has said publicly that no one will escape prosecution and that it has up to 20 years to follow up on cases of fraud. However, it also said it would not prosecute as many people as before the pandemic, despite a reduction of around 1,000 cases during the two pandemic years. HMRC says its strategy is to prosecute the most serious forms of evasion and criminal activity, and that it focuses on high- value and high-profile cases rather than large volumes of smaller cases. However, we are concerned that, without sufficient numbers of prosecutions, HMRC cannot demonstrate a credible deterrent effect. We have previously recommended that HMRC should measure the deterrent effect of its work, but it concluded that it could not do so. Recommendation 2: HMRC should develop a better understanding of the deterrent effect of its compliance work, for example by monitoring the future revenue benefit of prosecutions compared to those it decides not to prosecute. It should utilise the expertise of academics, if necessary, for example using the HMRC Datalab.
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the recommendation and commits to commencing new work in the 2023-24 financial year to understand the deterrent effect of criminal investigations resulting in prosecutions, with a target implementation date of June 2024.
Government Response Accepted
HM Government Accepted
2.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation Target implementation date: June 2024 2.2 Tax crime prosecutions are expected to increase in future years with a focus on the highest-harm and most serious cases of fraud. HMRC will commence new work in the 2023-24 financial year to understand the deterrent effect of the department’s criminal investigations resulting in prosecutions. The exact timeframe and scope of this work (including the methodological approach required) will be informed by an initial internal analysis and is dependent on the availability of appropriate data.