Recommendation 6

The Department has not yet learned lessons from managing major rail programmes. In previous examination of other rail programmes like Thameslink and the Great Western Railway modernisation we have reported very similar problems to the ones we are now seeing again with Euston. The Department and HS2 Ltd say that they are learning lessons from other programmes such as Crossrail. But that there is more for them to do for example, on cost estimation, the treatment of contingency and managing the integration of complex projects. They also acknowledge that there are lessons they could learn from the development at King’s Cross such as the value that could come from managing the work at Euston as one integrated programme. HS2 Ltd considers that the work at Manchester Piccadilly will be the most important place for them to learn the lessons from Euston, given that Curzon Street Station in Birmingham is already much more developed. However, both stations are major construction projects in their own right and careful scrutiny of costs needs to be maintained by the Department to ensure that similar mistakes 8 HS2 Euston do not reoccur. This will include thinking about the right set up and organisation of the project, getting it in place early and determining the scale of ambition for regeneration and over-site development work. Recommendation 6: The Department needs to demonstrate to Parliament and the public that they are successfully embedding the lessons from past rail projects and not just repeating the same mistakes. Specifically on Euston the Department and HS2 Ltd should report back to the Committee on: • what measures the Department and contractors took internally to address costs overruns and to identify who was responsible • what lessons they have learned from the Euston project and how it will apply them at both Birmingham Curzon Street, Manchester Piccadilly, having done so they will scrutinise the revised costs carefully to avoid further cost occurring in other pa