Recommendations & Conclusions
5 items
6
Recommendation
Thirtieth Report - The production and d…
Not Addressed
The continued reduction of coin use, possibly accelerated by Covid, is likely to put further pressure on the Royal Mint’s ability to deliver a profit on its UK coin manufacturing operations. Coin use has declined over recent years, and the Mint’s UK coin production has fallen by around 65% in …
Read more
The continued reduction of coin use, possibly accelerated by Covid, is likely to put further pressure on the Royal Mint’s ability to deliver a profit on its UK coin manufacturing operations. Coin use has declined over recent years, and the Mint’s UK coin production has fallen by around 65% in the last 10 years. For the last three years, the Mint has made losses in its coin-making, including a loss of £3.9 million in 2019–20. In March 2020, the Mint had no plans to manufacture any 2p or £2 coins. Although there has been a recent increase in the demand for coins during the Covid pandemic, this is expected to be temporary and the Mint thinks that the long-term impact of the pandemic will be to exacerbate the decline in coin use. Recommendation: In the Treasury Minute response to this report, HM Treasury and the Royal Mint should set out how they are ensuring that the plans for manufacturing UK coins are sustainable and cost effective. 8 The production and distribution of cash 1 Access to cash
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response is a boilerplate text about the Bounce Back Loan Scheme and does not address the recommendation for HM Treasury and the Royal Mint to outline plans for sustainable and cost-effective coin manufacturing.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
1
Conclusion
Thirtieth Report - The production and d…
Not Addressed
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Treasury, the Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Payment Systems Regulator and the Royal Mint, about the production and distribution of cash.1
Read more
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Treasury, the Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority, the Payment Systems Regulator and the Royal Mint, about the production and distribution of cash.1
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response does not address the Committee's introductory statement about taking evidence, instead focusing on different policy matters like cash access legislation and cashback.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
14
Conclusion
Thirtieth Report - The production and d…
Coins are produced for the whole of the UK by The Royal Mint (the Mint) under a contract with the Treasury, which also acts as the Mint’s sole shareholder. The Bank of England (the Bank) is responsible for producing notes for use throughout the UK, and it sub-contracts the printing …
Read more
Coins are produced for the whole of the UK by The Royal Mint (the Mint) under a contract with the Treasury, which also acts as the Mint’s sole shareholder. The Bank of England (the Bank) is responsible for producing notes for use throughout the UK, and it sub-contracts the printing of notes to De La Rue plc. The Treasury, the Mint and the Bank work to ensure that there is a sufficient quantity of cash to meet the needs of the economy, and to maintain the public’s confidence in its use. In 2019–20, the Treasury incurred UK coin production expenses of £23.6 million, and the Bank incurred note production and distribution expenses of £119 million.39 Demand for notes
Show less
HM Treasury
18
Conclusion
Thirtieth Report - The production and d…
Not Addressed
Once printed, the Bank holds contingency stocks of all notes at its premises to avoid shortages. The Bank sets its minimum contingency stock level by considering potential supply and demand shocks, and benchmarks itself against the practice of other major central banks.45 During 2020 the Bank’s stocks of notes have …
Read more
Once printed, the Bank holds contingency stocks of all notes at its premises to avoid shortages. The Bank sets its minimum contingency stock level by considering potential supply and demand shocks, and benchmarks itself against the practice of other major central banks.45 During 2020 the Bank’s stocks of notes have been nearly double its minimum contingency levels. At the end of March, it held contingency stocks with a value of £39 billion, against its minimum guidance levels of £20.5 billion, and at the end of July, 39 C&AG’s Report, para 4 40 C&AG’s Report, para 3.19 and Figure 12 41 Qq 52, 53; C&AG’s Report, para 3.21 42 Q 51; C&AG’s Report, Figure 12 43 Q 51 44 Qq 52, 53; C&AG’s Report, para 3.20 45 C&AG’s Report, para 3.29 The production and distribution of cash 13 contingency stocks were at £30.4 billion, against minimum levels of £15.6 billion. The cost of producing the stocks held at March 2020 above the minimum contingency levels was around £35 million, before taking account of any fixed costs, such as depreciation of machinery.46
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Bank of England's response does not directly address this conclusion, which details the Bank's high contingency stock levels and associated costs. Instead, it commits to reviewing documentation around stock decisions and ensuring factors are clearly recorded, which relates to a different recommendation.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
19
Conclusion
Thirtieth Report - The production and d…
Not Addressed
According to the Bank, it is not unusual for it to maintain high stocks. It told us that it is more efficient to have long print runs of each note denomination—often lasting up to a year—as short print runs require machine down time, and costly changeovers of printing plates and …
Read more
According to the Bank, it is not unusual for it to maintain high stocks. It told us that it is more efficient to have long print runs of each note denomination—often lasting up to a year—as short print runs require machine down time, and costly changeovers of printing plates and inks. It can therefore be a long time between print runs of the same note denomination, and in order to maintain sufficient contingencies, large stocks of each note denomination need to be maintained.47
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Bank of England's response, despite stating agreement, does not directly address the content of this conclusion which explains the Bank's current practice and rationale for maintaining high stocks. Instead, it commits to reviewing documentation around stock decisions, which relates to a different recommendation.
Read full response →
HM Treasury