Recommendations & Conclusions
7 items
2
Recommendation
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
The Department’s reliance on developer contributions to fund First Homes is a complex mechanism lacking transparency and risks less money being available to local authorities for housing and infrastructure. First Homes differ from Starter Homes as they will be sold at a higher discount, only to local first-time buyers, and …
Read more
The Department’s reliance on developer contributions to fund First Homes is a complex mechanism lacking transparency and risks less money being available to local authorities for housing and infrastructure. First Homes differ from Starter Homes as they will be sold at a higher discount, only to local first-time buyers, and with a discount that will be passed on to future buyers when First Homes are resold. First Homes will also be delivered through the existing planning system so are not dependent on new legislation. The discount will be funded through developer contributions. Local authorities will be expected to ensure 25% of affordable homes built by developers contribute to the First Homes initiative. We have previously criticised the system of developer contributions for its complexity, and lack of transparency over how much developers actually contribute. The Department does not have a timetable or target for delivering First Homes but is planning a pilot to build 1,500 First Homes ‘within the next couple of years’, which it wants to learn from before further planning of the new scheme. However, the Department could not say when First Homes would become more widely available and blamed its lack of clear timetable or targets on the uncertainty of the housing market. Recommendation: As part of the First Homes pilot, the Department should model the effect of funding First Homes from developer contributions on local authorities’ ability to fund local infrastructure and other housing needs, such as social housing, and what the opportunity cost is of using developer contributions in this way. It should also set out clearly how the secondary resale market will work. 6 Starter Homes
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states it has published modelling on the policy's effect on developer contributions. It has also developed a legal framework for the secondary resale market with HM Land Registry, which will be publicly set out in due course.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
7
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
We asked the Department about the similarities between the new First Homes policy and the Starter Homes policy. The Department emphasised how they differ: • First Homes will be sold at a higher discount of at least 30%, compared with 20% for Starter Homes; • the discount will exist in …
Read more
We asked the Department about the similarities between the new First Homes policy and the Starter Homes policy. The Department emphasised how they differ: • First Homes will be sold at a higher discount of at least 30%, compared with 20% for Starter Homes; • the discount will exist in perpetuity—it will be passed on to future buyers when First Homes are resold, unlike Starter Homes where the discount accrues to the homeowner over time; • First Homes will be sold only to local first-time buyers; and • First Homes will be delivered through the existing planning system so, unlike Starter Homes, are not dependent on new legislation.20 12 Qq 41–48 13 Q 87; C&AG’s Report, Figure 3 14 Qq 50–51 15 Q 63 16 Qq 52–54 17 Q 63 18 Q 58 19 Q 64 20 Qq 82–83 10 Starter Homes
Show less
Government response AI summary
The department has developed and started testing a legal framework with HM Land Registry to ensure First Homes discounts are passed on perpetually and will continue to work with stakeholders to ensure a smooth secondary market.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
13
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
We asked the Department what it now meant when it referred to ‘affordable’ housing, particularly in relation to the funding originally intended for Starter Homes that was subsequently redirected to a broader range of housing, including affordable homes.33 The 28 PAC’s Report, para 1 29 Q 68, HM Treasury, Government …
Read more
We asked the Department what it now meant when it referred to ‘affordable’ housing, particularly in relation to the funding originally intended for Starter Homes that was subsequently redirected to a broader range of housing, including affordable homes.33 The 28 PAC’s Report, para 1 29 Q 68, HM Treasury, Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Ninety-Fifth and on the Ninety-Ninth to the One Hundred and Eleventh reports from Session 2017–19, CP 176, October 2019 30 Qq 68–69 31 Qq 72, 94–96 32 Qq 73, 94–95 33 Qq 60–61, 63; C&AG’s Report, para 9 12 Starter Homes Department said that ‘affordable’ meant different things in different contexts—different areas had different housing requirements for housing that is affordable, and it varied in meaning across different housing programmes.34 Homes England explained that when it referred to affordable homes it was using the formal definition as set out in the 2018 version of the National Planning Policy Framework, which covers homes for rent, sale or shared ownership at less than market rates.35 Homes England committed to providing us with regular updates on the breakdown of different types of affordable home it is delivering.36
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agreed with the committee's recommendation and stated it was implemented, clarifying its definition of affordable housing in the National Planning Policy Framework and reiterating its commitment to investing over £12 billion in diverse affordable housing.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
14
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
Homes England told us that the number and proportion of affordable homes planned for the sites intended for Starter Homes has increased from 1,700 (29%) to 2,370 (36%), reflecting an increased focus on affordable housing.37 However, Homes England was unable to tell us how much each affordable home on these …
Read more
Homes England told us that the number and proportion of affordable homes planned for the sites intended for Starter Homes has increased from 1,700 (29%) to 2,370 (36%), reflecting an increased focus on affordable housing.37 However, Homes England was unable to tell us how much each affordable home on these sites would cost.38 We queried why the expected cost per affordable home of those funded by money intended for Starter Homes appeared much greater than the cost per affordable home delivered by local authorities. By our own calculations, Homes England spent £83,700 per affordable home funded through the Starter Homes 2015 funding, and £37,700 per affordable home funded through the Starter Homes Land Fund, yet local authorities spent £17,200 per affordable home.39 The Department asserted that the assessment of value derived from the funding intended for Starter Homes should encompass also those homes delivered for market and not only consider the number of affordable homes that had been built. It argued that these sites were on land that would otherwise be underused and not viable for building without government help, therefore an assessment of value achieved should include the homes built and sold at market value. It explained that, inevitably, affordable homes build on such sites would be more expensive than affordable homes built on less risky sites. It also noted that the local authority funding for Starter Homes was for sites that were already owned by local authorities and so could not be directly compared with other programmes.40 Housing for the homeless, rough sleepers and families in temporary accommodation
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it agreed with the committee's recommendation and considered it implemented, by defining affordable housing in the National Planning Policy Framework and committing over £12 billion to delivering a variety of affordable homes through the new £11.5 billion Affordable Homes Programme.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
15
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
First Homes, and previously Starter Homes, are aimed at people who want to own their own home and have an income, as the schemes require applicants to raise a mortgage. They are not schemes intended to help house people in temporary accommodation or who are homeless. We asked the Department …
Read more
First Homes, and previously Starter Homes, are aimed at people who want to own their own home and have an income, as the schemes require applicants to raise a mortgage. They are not schemes intended to help house people in temporary accommodation or who are homeless. We asked the Department how it was addressing the needs of these groups. The Department explained that the £12.2 billion Affordable Homes Programme contained other types of new housing supply which were intended to meet a variety of housing needs and circumstances.41 The Department explained how diversity of housing supply was key to building out sites and increasing rates of take up of new housing (the rate at which new housing is absorbed by the local market). Take up increases if a broader range of housing types appeals to a broader range of those in housing need.42 34 Qq 61, 66–67 35 Q 65 36 Q 67 37 Qq 54, 64 38 Q 55 39 Q 56 40 Qq 56, 58–59 41 Qq 88–89 42 Qq 94–96 Starter Homes 13
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepted the committee's recommendation to explain its approach to homelessness, rough sleeping, and temporary accommodation, committing to provide an update to the committee within three months (by April 2021).
Read full response →
HM Treasury
16
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
The Department and Homes England told that they were trying to encourage the building of smaller, cheaper homes through investing in firms that build modular homes and encouraging sites with high levels of modular construction. It explained it was looking to increase demand for this type of home. However, Homes …
Read more
The Department and Homes England told that they were trying to encourage the building of smaller, cheaper homes through investing in firms that build modular homes and encouraging sites with high levels of modular construction. It explained it was looking to increase demand for this type of home. However, Homes England cautioned that local authority planning committees were nervous of this type of home, so it was gathering the evidence to demonstrate to the sector that this was worthwhile and increase developer confidence.43
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation and commits to specific actions by Autumn 2021 to increase the use of modern methods of construction (MMC). These include Homes England funding for showcase sites, industry collaboration on warranties, research into safety, and setting a 25% MMC …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
19
Conclusion
Thirty-first Report - Starter Homes
Accepted
Homes England recognised that success in delivering housing would rely on close working with local authorities, good relationships with developers and mindfulness over land value as the key determinant of delivery and maximising value for money from public subsidy of housing.50 We asked the Department about its plan for long-term …
Read more
Homes England recognised that success in delivering housing would rely on close working with local authorities, good relationships with developers and mindfulness over land value as the key determinant of delivery and maximising value for money from public subsidy of housing.50 We asked the Department about its plan for long-term support, in recognition that building homes alone was not enough to keep people off the streets. The Department told us that, as part of its rough sleeping accommodation programme, it had made available £31 million to support rough sleepers transition into more sustainable pathways, as well as its £112 million rough sleeping initiative funding. We agreed with the Department that successful housing delivery was a long-term commitment and asked how it would ensure it was able to deliver this. The Department confirmed that was working through what funding it needed in future to continue with its support for rough sleepers.51 43 Q 80 44 Q 71 45 Qq 72–73 46 Qq 74–75 47 Qq 76–77 48 Qq 78–79 49 Q 97 50 Qq 56, 66 51 Qq 10–12, 87 14 Starter Homes
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepted the committee's recommendation to explain its approach to homelessness, rough sleeping, and temporary accommodation, committing to provide an update to the committee within three months (by April 2021).
Read full response →
HM Treasury