Recommendations & Conclusions
42 items
2
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
DHSC has failed in one of its most basic duties by keeping no proper record to justify its final selection of schemes for the programme. DHSC and NHS England officials carried out an assessment exercise which recommended 20 schemes for inclusion in the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP), a 2019 programme …
Read more
DHSC has failed in one of its most basic duties by keeping no proper record to justify its final selection of schemes for the programme. DHSC and NHS England officials carried out an assessment exercise which recommended 20 schemes for inclusion in the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP), a 2019 programme that became the main basis for selecting schemes for NHP. In finalising the schemes for announcement, DHSC removed seven of the 20 schemes from the shortlist for HIP and added another 14 that had not been recommended. DHSC told us it was satisfied that those decisions were made on an appropriate basis, but it admitted that no documentation whatsoever existed to explain the decisions. We are troubled that a gap like this can occur regarding such an important investment, particularly since at least some of the seven excluded schemes are known to have an urgent need for major investment or rebuilding. This Committee has previously expressed concern about a lack of evidence to justify scheme selection, and a lack of transparency in selection processes, for the Towns Fund in 2020 and for levelling-up funding in
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the omission in record-keeping for past scheme selections but asserts the process was based on clear criteria agreed with multiple bodies. It outlines its regular, existing selection process which follows HM Treasury's Five Case Model.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
3
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
Recent events have shown that DHSC will need to go faster with its efforts to deal with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) in hospitals. The hospitals named in the government’s October 2020 announcement of NHP included only two entirely constructed from RAAC. Five other RAAC hospitals that DHSC knew 6 …
Read more
Recent events have shown that DHSC will need to go faster with its efforts to deal with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) in hospitals. The hospitals named in the government’s October 2020 announcement of NHP included only two entirely constructed from RAAC. Five other RAAC hospitals that DHSC knew 6 The New Hospital Programme about were not included then, only to have to be added later. By early 2023, DHSC had identified a total of 41 NHS buildings with RAAC. Removing or mitigating the risk of RAAC is disruptive, complex and expensive. DHSC has set aside a total of £685 million to fund RAAC works up to 2024–25 and has committed to removing all RAAC from the NHS estate by 2035. After the scale and impact of RAAC problems in schools escalated in August 2023, NHS England contacted trusts to determine whether there was more RAAC than it previously knew about. After our evidence session DHSC reported that, as at 17 October 2023, there were 42 hospital sites (at 39 NHS trusts) where RAAC needs to be removed. Rebuilding the seven RAAC hospitals by 2030 will be extremely challenging, yet there is a serious risk, if these projects are not accelerated and prioritised, that some hospitals may have to close before replacements are ready. Recommendation 3: DHSC should revise its plans for managing the RAAC crisis, including: • Expediting surveys of the NHS estate and publishing the results in full so the extent and scale of the RAAC problem is known. • Reviewing whether the commitment to eradicate RAAC from the NHS should be brought forward from 2035, and, in light of NHS estate survey results, reviewing whether the existing £685 million fund up to 2024–25 is sufficient. • Aiming to start construction before the end of 2025 on replacements for the seven entirely RAAC hospitals. • Appointing a named senior official to oversee delivery of its RAAC plan and to support NHS trusts to make the right decisions on the safety of RAAC buildings. • To ensure transparency on th
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to publishing updated RAAC information on Gov.uk, aiming to begin early works for the seven entirely RAAC hospitals by the end of 2025, and will write to the Committee providing the name of the senior NHSE official for the RAAC plan. It …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
4
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Rejected
DHSC must quickly complete and test its standardised hospital design to avert further delays to hospital construction, and to reduce the current high risk of cost and quality issues in years to come. DHSC has taken too long to get its Hospital 2.0 design off the drawing board. It continues …
Read more
DHSC must quickly complete and test its standardised hospital design to avert further delays to hospital construction, and to reduce the current high risk of cost and quality issues in years to come. DHSC has taken too long to get its Hospital 2.0 design off the drawing board. It continues to be optimistic that the design and a related new commercial model will reduce future construction costs by 25% and could even reduce the total time taken to develop new hospitals from 11 years to six. Yet, until the design is complete and has been tested, these claims are at risk of being just pipe dreams. Unlike Denmark’s programme for building ‘super hospitals’, DHSC has not allowed time for proper piloting of its new standard hospital. Failure to pilot thoroughly could store up problems for future generations because of defective or poorly thought through standardisation. The New Hospital Programme 7 Recommendation 4: For the twin purposes of piloting and making progress, DHSC should aim to be ready to start construction during 2024 of at least one early scheme that uses its standardised hospital design, with a particular focus on trialling new clinical infrastructure such as standardised operating theatres.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to start construction of a standardised hospital design scheme in 2024, stating that starting construction without sufficient design maturity risks increased time and cost.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5
Recommendation
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
DHSC is at risk of locking in a standard design that will result in future hospitals being too small, which could lead to significantly greater expenditure and disruption in the long run. The version of Hospital 2.0 that DHSC used in its business case for NHP, and the basis on …
Read more
DHSC is at risk of locking in a standard design that will result in future hospitals being too small, which could lead to significantly greater expenditure and disruption in the long run. The version of Hospital 2.0 that DHSC used in its business case for NHP, and the basis on which HM Treasury has provided indicative future funding, is founded on unrealistic assumptions. It assumes that increasing demand for hospital care from a growing and ageing population can be mitigated by a very high level of bed occupancy (95%), substantial reductions in patients’ average length of stay in hospital, and a significant, recurring 1.8% per annum transfer of patient care out of hospitals into community settings. The NHS already has very high levels of bed occupancy and short average lengths of stay relative to the health services of other advanced nations. It is common knowledge that many parts of the primary and social care sectors are under great strain. Making these assumptions more realistic, at either a programme or scheme level, is likely to increase the cost of new hospitals and make the programme more expensive, meaning this is an issue that needs urgent attention and may well require a further reset of NHP. Recommendation 5a: DHSC should amend its Minimum Viable Product version of Hospital 2.0 so it does not result in future hospitals that are too small, and should set out clearly how these future hospitals fit into its assessment of total required hospital capacity nationally and by region. b) The Health and Social Care Committee may wish to consider holding an inquiry into DHSC’s assumptions about the design of future hospitals.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government notes the recommendation, stating it will engage with any future Health and Social Care Committee inquiries and is continuing to review Hospital 2.0 designs with experts to meet local needs, with the next product release expected in May 2024.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
6
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
There appears to be insufficient funding for DHSC to build all the hospitals it plans, and to an adequate size, by 2030. HM Treasury initially allocated £3.7 billion to NHP for the period up to the end of 2024–25 with no indication of what further money it would give up …
Read more
There appears to be insufficient funding for DHSC to build all the hospitals it plans, and to an adequate size, by 2030. HM Treasury initially allocated £3.7 billion to NHP for the period up to the end of 2024–25 with no indication of what further money it would give up to 2030. In early 2023, it finally set an indicative maximum for capital funding of £18.5 billion for the following six years, making a total of £22.2 billion. Funding is needed for the schemes to be completed by 2030, as well as for early works on the eight schemes that will now complete after 2030. Long experience suggests that many schemes in NHP will come in over budget. Schemes in NHP’s cohorts 1 and 2 have already seen forecast costs increase by 41%. Getting the standard design of future hospitals right may also have the effect of increasing estimated costs. Other factors such as high inflation, insufficient capacity in the construction industry, and the need for many more factories to manufacture modular units offsite could drive up costs further. Recommendation 6: DHSC should be realistic about the likely cost of schemes and what can be afforded by 2030. As well as addressing the shortcomings in its Minimum Viable Product version of Hospital 2.0, it should engage further with the construction industry to understand and manage likely capacity constraints. It and HM Treasury should agree explicitly and in writing whether the pre-2030 costs of eight delayed cohort 4 schemes are to be met from the current agreed funding envelope. 8 The New Hospital Programme
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees to continue engaging with the construction industry, including a market event held in November 2023. It intends for the programme business case, due for approval by May 2024, to explicitly include proposed funding for the pre-2030 costs of the eight delayed cohort …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
7
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
The Programme is over-reliant on consultancy services. NHP has depended heavily on external consultants since its creation, with 62% of posts filled using consultancy services in February 2023. DHSC estimates it will spend a further £842 million on consultancy services between 2023–24 and 203031. Some use of consultancy is to …
Read more
The Programme is over-reliant on consultancy services. NHP has depended heavily on external consultants since its creation, with 62% of posts filled using consultancy services in February 2023. DHSC estimates it will spend a further £842 million on consultancy services between 2023–24 and 203031. Some use of consultancy is to be expected on major construction programmes, but, as well as being expensive, over-reliance risks a lack of continuity and failure to build in-house capability. NHP aspires to be a long-term programme of hospital improvement well beyond 2030, so it is vital that the public sector itself acquires and retains the right skills. Recommendation 7: DHSC should work with HM Treasury and the Cabinet Office to develop a strategy for attracting into the civil service and retaining there the skills it needs to run a rolling programme of hospital construction; it should write to the Committee by March 2024 setting out what it will do differently in future.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to writing to the Committee by March 2024, as requested, to outline its strategy for attracting and retaining civil service skills for the NHP. It states it already has a recruitment strategy, is actively recruiting, and is procuring a programme delivery partner.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
The raiding of capital budgets in the recent past is an underlying cause of the estates crisis the NHS is now in. As this Committee has highlighted several times, DHSC has for some years focused on short-term financial viability in ways that failed to consider the long-term consequences for services …
Read more
The raiding of capital budgets in the recent past is an underlying cause of the estates crisis the NHS is now in. As this Committee has highlighted several times, DHSC has for some years focused on short-term financial viability in ways that failed to consider the long-term consequences for services and patient care. DHSC diverted £4.3 billion of NHS capital funding from planned capital spending to day-to-day spending between 2014–15 and 2018–19; and by 2021–22 there was a record maintenance backlog of £10.2 billion. Under-investment in the estate has resulted in a situation that now requires urgent action. This includes but is not limited to the crisis with RAAC. Working in out-of-date buildings that have not been well maintained also makes it hard for the NHS to modernise and recover its performance to the standards required in the NHS Constitution, and is only likely to exacerbate problems in attracting and retaining staff. Recommendation 8: DHSC should not reduce planned capital investment to meet day-to-day spending needs in future; if officials were to consider doing this again we would expect the Permanent Secretary to write to Ministers explaining the likely real-life consequences of such a course of action. The New Hospital Programme 9 1 Progress in construction and developing new hospital design
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees in principle not to reduce planned capital investment, but states it will continue to follow its usual processes for financial decisions, including switching capital budgets in exceptional circumstances, and will make considerations clear as part of Ministerial advice.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
1
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England about the New Hospital Programme (NHP).1
Government response AI summary
The government provides an update on the New Hospital Programme, stating that four hospitals are open, 18 schemes are underway, and it is building capacity by recruiting staff and procuring a programme delivery partner. It is also examining options for progressing some schemes using existing …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
9
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Deferred
DHSC claims that its plans to standardise approvals processes and that hospital design will reduce the time taken to build a hospital from as much as 11 years to about six. We asked whether there was a case for rebuilding some hospitals using traditional methods so that more work could …
Read more
DHSC claims that its plans to standardise approvals processes and that hospital design will reduce the time taken to build a hospital from as much as 11 years to about six. We asked whether there was a case for rebuilding some hospitals using traditional methods so that more work could be done sooner – as discussed later in this report, DHSC is delayed in creating the new standardised process and design. DHSC’s view was that reverting to the traditional method would actually take longer.15 We note though that the Infrastructure and Projects Authority has previously highlighted issues with the 7 HM Government, PM confirms £3.7 billion for 40 hospitals in biggest hospital building programme in a generation, 2 October 2020; accessed at www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-confirms-37-billion-for-40- hospitals-in-biggest-hospital-building-programme-in-a-generation 8 Q 45; C&AG’s Report, para 12 and Figure 5 9 C&AG’s Report, Figure 8; [DHSC letter 26/9] 10 Qq 42–43 11 Qq 56–57 12 C&AG’s Report, Figure 9 and para 2.18 13 Letter from Shona Dunn, DHSC dated 26 September 2023 14 Qq 47, 52; C&AG’s Report para 20 and Figure 12 15 Qq 29–31 The New Hospital Programme 11 capability of NHP’s leadership. As NHP has structured its programme, its central team will need deep expertise in large-scale programme management as well as design and construction skills.16
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it is examining the possibility of using existing design and contracting approaches for a small number of schemes to accelerate delivery, with final decisions on this to be made by summer 2024.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
10
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Not Addressed
After the evidence session, DHSC provided us with its current detailed schedule showing the approval and construction stages for each scheme to be completed by 2030. DHSC told us that this would be subject to detailed re-planning which is underway and asked us not to publish the information on the …
Read more
After the evidence session, DHSC provided us with its current detailed schedule showing the approval and construction stages for each scheme to be completed by 2030. DHSC told us that this would be subject to detailed re-planning which is underway and asked us not to publish the information on the grounds of commercial sensitivity, in particular with future competitive tendering processes in mind.17 However, with 19 new schemes (cohorts 3 and 4 and the additional RAAC hospitals) all to be completed by 2030 but not yet ready to start construction, it is clear that a very large number are currently scheduled to be under construction simultaneously during the last years of this decade. This is in a context in which a total of just four main contactors appear to be willing to consider building a large new hospital.18 Developing and testing a new standard hospital design
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government provides a generic statement about its commitment to rational decisions and balancing information protection, but does not address the committee's specific concerns about the feasibility of the construction schedule or contractor capacity.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
11
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Rejected
DHSC aims to improve the cost-effectiveness and quality of new hospitals by standardising hospital design, including the business case process, and making increased use of modern methods of construction.19 Many traditional hospital construction schemes suffered from cost overruns and delays, which the NHP team believes it can reduce through a …
Read more
DHSC aims to improve the cost-effectiveness and quality of new hospitals by standardising hospital design, including the business case process, and making increased use of modern methods of construction.19 Many traditional hospital construction schemes suffered from cost overruns and delays, which the NHP team believes it can reduce through a more centralised, modern approach. But NHP’s estimates of the level of savings that can be made are very ambitious. It has previously said that schemes that fully adopt its new approach would cost 25% less and take 20% less time to build than under traditional design and construction approaches. Then, at our evidence session in September, DHSC was more optimistic regarding time savings, telling us the model would reduce the total time taken to develop new hospitals from an average of 11 years to about six. This would amount to a time saving of some 40%, twice as much as was estimated earlier in 2023.20
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the committee's implicit recommendation, reaffirming its commitment to test Hospital 2.0, its standardised approach, starting with RAAC schemes, while undertaking deep dive reviews and developing prototyping facilities from late 2024.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
12
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Rejected
In practice, these future time and cost savings also need to be set against the time and cost taken to develop the new approach and additional costs as a result of inflation while schemes wait to proceed. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority recommended that the NHP team should complete its …
Read more
In practice, these future time and cost savings also need to be set against the time and cost taken to develop the new approach and additional costs as a result of inflation while schemes wait to proceed. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority recommended that the NHP team should complete its standardised design by the end of 2022, for use in early proof of concept testing. Instead, the NHP team plans to release the template design, known as Hospital 2.0, in stages during 2023, with the final release by December 2023. However, by July 2023 the NHP team was running around five months behind schedule.21 DHSC told us that some elements of the design had been finished and that the complete package would be ready by May 2024.22 The C&AG’s report of July 2023 highlighted that there were delays in recruiting a temporary design team of up to 300 specialist designers. Remarkably, in September, DHSC told us that it had now recruited the team it needed to complete Hospital 2.0.23 16 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.24 and 3.25 17 Letter from Shona Dunn, DHSC dated 26 September 2023 18 C&AG’s Report, para 17 and Figure 12 19 Q 29; C&AG’s Report, para 3.6 20 Q 29; C&AG’s Report, para 3.6 21 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.8 and 3.9 22 Q 84 23 Q 31; C&AG’s Report, para 3.9 12 The New Hospital Programme
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the committee's implicit recommendation regarding delays, stating it will test Hospital 2.0 with RAAC schemes, acknowledging construction is unlikely to start in 2024 but highlighting ongoing design and prototyping work for late 2024.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
13
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Deferred
Among DHSC’s other commitments, the need to rebuild the seven RAAC hospitals by 2030 is particularly pressing. RAAC hospitals are costing taxpayers a lot of money as remedial measures are taken to keep them safe and open.24 In this context, insisting on using Hospital 2.0 designs for all seven schemes …
Read more
Among DHSC’s other commitments, the need to rebuild the seven RAAC hospitals by 2030 is particularly pressing. RAAC hospitals are costing taxpayers a lot of money as remedial measures are taken to keep them safe and open.24 In this context, insisting on using Hospital 2.0 designs for all seven schemes seems questionable. The seriousness of the RAAC issue and the need to complete these rebuilds by 2030 creates a strong case for procuring and constructing the seven hospitals under traditional methods, even if that would mean not complying fully with the as yet incomplete Hospital 2.0 design.25
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is examining the possibility of progressing a small number of schemes, including RAAC hospitals, using traditional design and contracting methods, with decisions expected by summer 2024, while also intending to test Hospital 2.0 within RAAC schemes.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
14
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Rejected
More generally, we asked DHSC whether it should commit to first building one hospital according to Hospital 2.0 designs in order to discover its viability in practice, the true scope for cost and time savings, and problems and snags that could be removed, before the design is repeated across multiple …
Read more
More generally, we asked DHSC whether it should commit to first building one hospital according to Hospital 2.0 designs in order to discover its viability in practice, the true scope for cost and time savings, and problems and snags that could be removed, before the design is repeated across multiple schemes. DHSC seemed reluctant to accept the desirability of rigorous real-life testing, replying generically that it was always looking for opportunities to accelerate the programme.26
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the recommendation for a single pilot hospital, stating it will test Hospital 2.0 within RAAC schemes and further develop designs through established prototyping facilities from late 2024, prior to construction.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
15
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Rejected
Before the evidence session, we visited a “super hospital” project in Denmark. The Danes had built a prototype of a new operating theatre on the edge of an existing hospital and each surgical team was given access to it so they could test how it worked in practice. Using the …
Read more
Before the evidence session, we visited a “super hospital” project in Denmark. The Danes had built a prototype of a new operating theatre on the edge of an existing hospital and each surgical team was given access to it so they could test how it worked in practice. Using the lessons from these clinicians, the new hospital was being built with theatres that were already known to work for all types of surgery. We asked whether the NHP team was planning to use similar live clinical exercises. DHSC told us it was consulting with clinicians but was not currently planning live testing. The NHP team will look at organisations that already have new facilities.27 However it decides to proceed, NHP needs to get the Hospital 2.0 design and build right, otherwise all new hospitals will have problems in years to come.28 Assumptions underlying new standard hospital design
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government disagrees with the recommendation for similar live clinical exercises, stating it will test Hospital 2.0 within RAAC schemes and use prototyping facilities from late 2024 to engage clinicians and manufacturers in improving designs and aiding training.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
16
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
With the aim of minimising costs while still meeting its programme objectives, the NHP team has been focusing on a basic version of Hospital 2.0, known as the ‘minimum viable product’ (MVP). Under MVP, hospitals will have the minimum viable set of services, in the minimum viable building size, built …
Read more
With the aim of minimising costs while still meeting its programme objectives, the NHP team has been focusing on a basic version of Hospital 2.0, known as the ‘minimum viable product’ (MVP). Under MVP, hospitals will have the minimum viable set of services, in the minimum viable building size, built to the minimum viable specification, and at the minimum viable cost and time to build. All hospitals from cohort 3 onwards will have single rooms only, instead of open wards.29 But some of the assumptions used to determine the size of an MVP hospital are likely to result in hospitals that are too small to meet future needs, which would be a risk to efficiency and effectiveness as well as presenting clinical challenges:30 • MVP assumes there will be a 1.8% reduction each year in hospital capacity needed as a result of more people being treated outside hospital, in the community.31 This may be unrealistic because NHS England does not currently have a funded strategy to deliver such reductions and government has not produced 24 C&AG’s Report, para 6 25 Qq 29–31 26 Qq 60, 117 27 Qq 78–79 28 Q 117 29 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.9–3.11 30 Q 61; C&AG’s Report, para 24 31 C&AG’s Report, para 3.14 The New Hospital Programme 13 a long-term plan for social care. Neither does the assumption take account of a number of significant pressures outside hospitals, including in adult social care, community mental health services and GPs.32 • MVP also assumes that future patients will stay in hospital for 12% less time on average. This may be unrealistic because England already has one of the shortest lengths of stay per patient of any country in the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD) – 4.5 days on average in England in 2019– 20, compared with 8 days in the OECD. NHP even paid for research which did not back up this assumption.33 • Finally, MVP assumes that future bed occupancy will run on average at 95%. Once again, this may be unrealistic because England already has
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that future hospitals must be the right size, committing to keep assumptions under constant review, working with NHSE to develop long-term infrastructure modelling, and creating a bottom-up assessment model with local stakeholders.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
17
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
In written evidence to us, NHS Providers advised that the standardised design had to be sufficiently future-proofed to handle changes in demand, practice and public expectations. It was concerned that future planned bed occupancy levels should be safe, and warned that 95% occupancy “may not be sustainable” and might not …
Read more
In written evidence to us, NHS Providers advised that the standardised design had to be sufficiently future-proofed to handle changes in demand, practice and public expectations. It was concerned that future planned bed occupancy levels should be safe, and warned that 95% occupancy “may not be sustainable” and might not be flexible enough to allow hospitals to cope with fluctuations in demand.35
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that future hospitals must be the right size, committing to keep assumptions under constant review and working jointly with NHSE and local bodies to model long-term infrastructure needs and ensure future expansion capability.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
18
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We challenged DHSC about the realism of the MVP assumptions, particularly in the context of a growing and aging population, and asked if it would review them. DHSC told us that these were baseline assumptions, enabling like-for-like comparisons to be made between schemes, and that it was going through a …
Read more
We challenged DHSC about the realism of the MVP assumptions, particularly in the context of a growing and aging population, and asked if it would review them. DHSC told us that these were baseline assumptions, enabling like-for-like comparisons to be made between schemes, and that it was going through a process to decide what size each new hospital needed to be. It assured us it was going to review the assumptions rigorously.36 As discussed later in this report, however, any deviations from MVP to make individual hospitals bigger may create an affordability problem for NHP, because the hospitals will cost more.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, stating it will keep hospital size assumptions under constant review. It details work underway with NHS England to develop modelling, put forward program scope options by May 2024, and create a bottom-up model with trusts to assess demand and ensure …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
19
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We asked NHS England whether it was concerned about the assumptions and if switching to wards with single rooms only was safe. It told us that it was working with the NHP team and that Hospital 2.0 must be fit for purpose and thoroughly tested. It also wanted services in …
Read more
We asked NHS England whether it was concerned about the assumptions and if switching to wards with single rooms only was safe. It told us that it was working with the NHP team and that Hospital 2.0 must be fit for purpose and thoroughly tested. It also wanted services in community, primary care and social care to change in a way that would support the aim of reducing the time patients spend in hospital.37 Regarding the safety of single rooms, NHS England assured us that new hospitals could safely monitor and oversee single rooms by adapting their clinical models of care. Some other developed countries already have single rooms as standard and in some it is a legal requirement.38 NHS England acknowledged that there would need to be a change in staff mix, and potentially an increase in staff numbers, to cope with the new single-room layout.39 32 Qq 61, 66; C&AG’s Report, para 3.14 33 C&AG’s Report, para 3.14 34 C&AG’s Report, para 3.14 35 NHP0005 36 Qq 61–66 37 Qq 65, 74 38 Q 69 39 Q 70 14 The New Hospital Programme 2 Dealing with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) and transparency of selection Dealing with RAAC
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government, despite the item being a conclusion, states it 'agrees with the Committee’s recommendation' and is implementing it. It commits to keeping hospital size assumptions under constant review and details work with NHS England on modelling, business case options by May 2024, and a …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
20
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
Reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) is a lightweight building material that was widely used from the 1960s to the 1980s. From the late 1990s, industry bodies warned that it was unlikely to remain structurally sound for more than 30 years after construction. NHS England became aware of its problem with …
Read more
Reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) is a lightweight building material that was widely used from the 1960s to the 1980s. From the late 1990s, industry bodies warned that it was unlikely to remain structurally sound for more than 30 years after construction. NHS England became aware of its problem with RAAC from around 2019, after a school roof collapse led to a national alert in 2019 about the risk of sudden failure.40 Mitigating the risk of structural failures from RAAC can be very disruptive to a hospital’s operations. We visited two hospitals with RAAC and saw for ourselves the impact on clinical work. This included wards having to close urgently and the managing of patient admissions based on weight because of the risk of a floor collapse. DHSC confirmed that there was an impact on clinical spaces and NHS England told us “the management of RAAC can be really burdensome for local teams” and that mitigations could not completely eliminate risks.41
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirms the New Hospital Programme now includes the replacement of all seven RAAC hospitals, with early works to prepare sites beginning by the end of 2025, and existing hospitals remaining safe through ongoing monitoring. The department will assess RAAC in other health and …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
21
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
When the government announced the first 32 new hospitals in October 2020, it included just two hospitals with RAAC throughout (West Suffolk Hospital and James Paget University Hospital).42 Five other hospitals with RAAC throughout that DHSC knew about and wanted to replace were not then included in the Programme. These …
Read more
When the government announced the first 32 new hospitals in October 2020, it included just two hospitals with RAAC throughout (West Suffolk Hospital and James Paget University Hospital).42 Five other hospitals with RAAC throughout that DHSC knew about and wanted to replace were not then included in the Programme. These five were added to NHP only when it was reset in May 2023.43
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirms that following a program reset in May 2023, the New Hospital Programme now includes the replacement of all seven RAAC hospitals, detailing ongoing monitoring, mitigation, and plans for early works by the end of 2025, with further assessment of RAAC across the …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
22
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
NHS England told us that it had set up a separate programme in 2019 to deal with RAAC.44 In 2020, government committed to remove RAAC from the NHS estate by 2035, subsequently allocating £685 million for RAAC management and remediation for the period up to 2024–25.45 This has been supplemented …
Read more
NHS England told us that it had set up a separate programme in 2019 to deal with RAAC.44 In 2020, government committed to remove RAAC from the NHS estate by 2035, subsequently allocating £685 million for RAAC management and remediation for the period up to 2024–25.45 This has been supplemented by £18 million of additional funding from NHS England in 2021–22 and 2022–23 as well as an unspecified amount from trusts’ own capital.46 By December 2022, DHSC had identified 41 NHS buildings with RAAC, spread across 23 trusts. This includes the seven hospitals with RAAC throughout.47
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges its commitment to eradicate RAAC by 2035, stating this will remain under review. It notes ongoing work to rebuild affected hospitals and assesses financial implications, with future funding needs beyond 2024-25 to be addressed in subsequent Spending Reviews.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
23
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
After the RAAC crisis in schools escalated in August 2023 and the Institution of Structural Engineers’ guidance was updated, NHS England asked all NHS trusts to confirm they were confident that all RAAC buildings had been identified. At the time of our evidence session, NHS England thought it likely that …
Read more
After the RAAC crisis in schools escalated in August 2023 and the Institution of Structural Engineers’ guidance was updated, NHS England asked all NHS trusts to confirm they were confident that all RAAC buildings had been identified. At the time of our evidence session, NHS England thought it likely that some further RAAC buildings would come to light. Although it did not know the precise number, it thought it was likely to be in the tens and not the hundreds.48 NHS England told us it aimed to have full surveys done of all the known RAAC sites in a matter of weeks, but the timing depended on having 40 Q 1; C&AG’s Report, para 6 41 Q 24 42 C&AG’s Report, Figure 12 43 C&AG’s Report, para 10 and Figure 1 44 Q 1 45 C&AG’s Report, para 6 and Figure 3 46 Qq 9–10; Letter from Shona Dunn, DHSC dated 26 September 2023 47 C&AG’s Report, Figure 3 48 Qq 1–3 The New Hospital Programme 15 surveyors available. After our evidence session, DHSC published an update of the number of NHS trusts and hospital sites: as at 17 October 2023 there are 42 hospital sites at 39 NHS trusts where RAAC is still to be removed.49 There are a limited number of specialist engineering firms that can undertake this work, and NHS England acknowledges that it is “fishing in the same pool” with the Department for Education which also needs surveyors for schools.50 This is vital work but also time-consuming. Visual inspections of ceilings may be insufficient as they cannot substantiate one way or the other whether structures above the ceiling are made of RAAC. Invasive inspections can in themselves be disruptive.51 In written evidence to us, the Manufacturing Technology Centre advocated a RAAC mitigation strategy to coordinate and resource the response across government.52
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to continuing to work with NHS Trusts to expedite RAAC surveys where possible and will continue to publish and update information on confirmed RAAC within the NHS on Gov.uk.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
24
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Deferred
NHS England also provided us with an update on its progress in dealing with known RAAC buildings. At the time we took evidence in September, it told us that there were projects to remove RAAC from the then 24 sites where it had a full understanding of the issues. It …
Read more
NHS England also provided us with an update on its progress in dealing with known RAAC buildings. At the time we took evidence in September, it told us that there were projects to remove RAAC from the then 24 sites where it had a full understanding of the issues. It was aiming to eradicate RAAC in most places by 2030.53 We asked whether there would be enough money to continue and complete remediation after 2024–25, when current funding runs out. DHSC told us that it had no reason to think there would not be enough funding but that this would have to be considered as part of the next spending review.54
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government, despite stating 'recommendation implemented', confirms that funding needs for RAAC mitigation and eradication beyond 2024-25 will inform bids at subsequent Spending Reviews, thus deferring a definitive commitment. It also commits to writing to the Committee with an assessment of RAAC in other health …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
25
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
We asked whether NHS trusts were getting adequate help from national bodies given the risks they had to manage. NHS England told use that it was helping trusts to source the right technical support, but trusts themselves were responsible for managing their estate and the risks within it.55 Trusts were …
Read more
We asked whether NHS trusts were getting adequate help from national bodies given the risks they had to manage. NHS England told use that it was helping trusts to source the right technical support, but trusts themselves were responsible for managing their estate and the risks within it.55 Trusts were already expected to complete a full survey of their estate every five years.56
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government, despite stating 'recommendation implemented', broadly outlines ongoing work with NHS Trusts to expedite RAAC surveys and publish information. It doesn't specifically address the committee's observation on the adequacy of help provided to trusts, beyond implying continued support through existing work.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
26
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
The seven RAAC hospitals each has a replacement cost estimated at between £500 million and £1.5 billion.57 NHP intends to build all seven RAAC replacement hospitals by 2030 using its standard Hospital 2.0 design. DHSC and NHS England are prioritising NHP schemes above other kinds of capital investment and recognise …
Read more
The seven RAAC hospitals each has a replacement cost estimated at between £500 million and £1.5 billion.57 NHP intends to build all seven RAAC replacement hospitals by 2030 using its standard Hospital 2.0 design. DHSC and NHS England are prioritising NHP schemes above other kinds of capital investment and recognise that they must replace the RAAC hospitals as quickly as possible.58 They told us it would be a challenge to complete them by 2030 because of the size of the schemes and the fact that only some of them have previously developed plans.59 Hospitals with extensive structural problems due to RAAC, even with mitigations, might be at risk of closure right up until the day they are replaced.60 49 DHSC, Transparency data: Hospitals with RAAC in England, 19 October 2023; accessed at www.gov.uk/ government/publications/reinforced-autoclaved-aerated-concrete-raac-in-hospitals-management-information 50 Qq 5–6 51 Q 28 52 NHP0007 53 Q 1 54 Q 8 55 Qq 16–20 56 Q 22; Letter from Shona Dunn, DHSC dated 26 September 2023 57 C&AG’s Report, Figures 17 and 18 58 Qq 13, 25 59 Qq 1, 14–15, 25 60 Qq 24, 111 16 The New Hospital Programme Transparency of the scheme selection process
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government, despite the item being a conclusion, states 'recommendation implemented' and commits to beginning early works to prepare sites for the seven RAAC replacement hospitals by the end of 2025. It also reiterates the commitment to eradicate RAAC by 2035 and continue ongoing monitoring.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
27
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
DHSC launched a major capital investment programme, the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP), in 2019. It comprised 27 schemes, all of which joined NHP in 2020. When one of the HIP schemes was split into five separate schemes, the total number grew to 31. An additional scheme (Shotley Bridge Hospital) was …
Read more
DHSC launched a major capital investment programme, the Health Infrastructure Plan (HIP), in 2019. It comprised 27 schemes, all of which joined NHP in 2020. When one of the HIP schemes was split into five separate schemes, the total number grew to 31. An additional scheme (Shotley Bridge Hospital) was then added, making 32 new hospital schemes in the original NHP announcement. A further eight unspecified new hospital schemes were also promised.61 To bring the total schemes under NHP’s management to 48, eight pre-existing schemes were also moved into the programme.62
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the committee's summary by providing background on the deteriorating NHS estate, the commitment to build 40 new hospitals by 2030, and the establishment and funding of the New Hospital Programme to address these issues.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
28
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
Selection of the 27 HIP schemes was carried out by DHSC and NHS England. NHS England produced a long list of 56 possible schemes, and DHSC reduced this to a shortlist of 20 schemes using clear, evidence-based criteria.63 However, to arrive at that 27 schemes that were announced, DHSC included …
Read more
Selection of the 27 HIP schemes was carried out by DHSC and NHS England. NHS England produced a long list of 56 possible schemes, and DHSC reduced this to a shortlist of 20 schemes using clear, evidence-based criteria.63 However, to arrive at that 27 schemes that were announced, DHSC included only 13 of the 20 shortlisted schemes, and removed the other seven. DHSC added another 14 schemes. These had previously been considered but had not scored highly enough in the assessment exercise. Officials told the National Audit Office (NAO) that there was no further documentation available to explain how this final selection was arrived at. This failure of documentation practices meant the NAO had no basis to determine why DHSC selected the 27 HIP schemes and not some of the other shortlisted schemes.64 NHS Providers noted that all NHS trust leaders would be concerned about this and would expect such decisions to be made transparently, using clear criteria to evaluate all schemes that applied.65
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the recommendation, acknowledging a past omission in record-keeping for HIP scheme selections. It commits to ensuring its practices result in rational decisions with appropriate documentation and will be able to provide evidence on future decision outcomes, balanced with protecting sensitive information.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
29
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We asked DHSC how this serious failure could have occurred and what it was doing about it. DHSC’s Second Permanent Secretary confirmed that there was no record from that time which was “extremely disappointing” and said she had improved record keeping in DHSC and hoped a similar omission would not …
Read more
We asked DHSC how this serious failure could have occurred and what it was doing about it. DHSC’s Second Permanent Secretary confirmed that there was no record from that time which was “extremely disappointing” and said she had improved record keeping in DHSC and hoped a similar omission would not occur now. She told us there were a lot of discussions about scheme selection for HIP. Her predecessor told her he was satisfied that the decisions were made on an appropriate basis. We asked whether interventions in respect of ministers’ or special advisors’ political priorities might have caused the evidence- based shortlist to change in a way that was not appropriate. The Second Permanent could only say that she was “pretty confident” that her predecessor would have been “pretty confident” in calling out such behaviour.66
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the implicit recommendation for improved record-keeping and transparency in major capital program selections, acknowledging a past omission. It commits to ensuring future practices allow for providing evidence on decision outcomes, while balancing this with the need to protect sensitive information.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
30
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We have previously expressed concern about a lack of evidence and transparency to justify scheme selection in other parts of government.67 In our 2020 report on the Towns Fund, we found that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was not open about the process it followed and did …
Read more
We have previously expressed concern about a lack of evidence and transparency to justify scheme selection in other parts of government.67 In our 2020 report on the Towns Fund, we found that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was not open about the process it followed and did not disclose reasons for selecting or excluding particular towns. This lack of transparency fuelled accusations of political bias in the selection process.68 In our 2022 report on local economic growth, we found that the 61 C&AG’s Report, paras 1.8 and 2.7, Figure 5 62 C&AG’s Report, para 1.10 63 C&AG’s Report para 1.9 64 C&AG’s Report, paras 9, 1.8 and 1.9 65 NHP00005 66 Qq 102–107, 115, 116 67 Q 108 68 Committee of Public Accounts, Selecting towns for the Towns Fund, Twenty-Fourth report of Session 2019–21, HC 651, 2 November 2020 The New Hospital Programme 17 Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities’ principles for awarding grants of levelling-up funding were only finalised by ministers after they knew which bidders would win grants as a result.69
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the overarching concern about transparency in scheme selection processes, acknowledging a past omission in record-keeping. It commits to ensuring future practices allow for providing evidence on decision outcomes, balanced against protecting sensitive information, thereby addressing the underlying issue raised by the committee's …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
31
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We asked witnesses about the implications for the seven schemes that had been removed from the shortlist. For example, it was reported that in August 2023 a ceiling at the hospital in Doncaster collapsed and that there was a risk of the facility closing. NHS England told us that the …
Read more
We asked witnesses about the implications for the seven schemes that had been removed from the shortlist. For example, it was reported that in August 2023 a ceiling at the hospital in Doncaster collapsed and that there was a risk of the facility closing. NHS England told us that the NHS had to manage these and other risks, such as flooding and fire, “day in, day out”. This was linked to the big increase in the maintenance backlog and NHS England had other funds available to help with these situations. It would though continue to argue for increased investment.70 69 Commons Committee of Public Accounts, Local economic growth, Fifth Report of Session 2022–23, HC 252, 8 June 2020 70 Qq 111–113 18 The New Hospital Programme 3 Future funding, use of consultants and transfers of capital Future funding
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it is providing record capital funding to the NHS and that decisions to switch capital budgets are only made in exceptional circumstances, following usual processes. It commits to providing more certainty for NHS capital through rolling investment programmes, indicating the recommendation is …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
32
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
The Government’s announcement of the New Hospital Programme in October 2020 stated that the 40 listed schemes (cohorts 1 to 4) would be “fully funded”. However, in the 2020 Spending Review, HM Treasury only allocated capital funding of £3.7 billion to the NHP for the four years up to 202425; …
Read more
The Government’s announcement of the New Hospital Programme in October 2020 stated that the 40 listed schemes (cohorts 1 to 4) would be “fully funded”. However, in the 2020 Spending Review, HM Treasury only allocated capital funding of £3.7 billion to the NHP for the four years up to 202425; this did not amount to full funding for the 40 new hospitals and the eight pre-existing schemes. There was no indication at that point of what further money it would give up to 2030. In March 2023, HM Treasury finally agreed a funding envelope and scope for NHP up to 2030–31 (subject to future spending reviews). According to this, the maximum NHP could expect to spend on the programme from 2025–26 to 203031 was £18.5 billion.71
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that NHP plans and costs should be realistic and deliverable, stating it has provided clarity on funding and is developing a third version of the programme business case for approval by May 2024 to confirm funding for schemes, including those completing after …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
33
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We have previously reported on many of government’s major projects and, time and again, we have seen difficulties with keeping to budgeted costs.72 This might well be repeated with NHP. Forecast costs for the 18 schemes in cohorts 1 and 2 increased by 41% between 2020 and 2023.73
Read more
We have previously reported on many of government’s major projects and, time and again, we have seen difficulties with keeping to budgeted costs.72 This might well be repeated with NHP. Forecast costs for the 18 schemes in cohorts 1 and 2 increased by 41% between 2020 and 2023.73
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees NHP plans and costs should be realistic and deliverable, highlighting actions like providing clearer funding, engaging with the construction industry, and developing a new programme business case for approval by May 2024 to manage costs and secure future funding.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
34
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
DHSC faces a number of specific pressures that could make cost overruns more likely. If any of the key assumptions underlying the MVP model of Hospital 2.0 prove overly optimistic or detrimental to future healthcare provision, such as the assumed 95% bed occupancy rate, then NHP may require more funding …
Read more
DHSC faces a number of specific pressures that could make cost overruns more likely. If any of the key assumptions underlying the MVP model of Hospital 2.0 prove overly optimistic or detrimental to future healthcare provision, such as the assumed 95% bed occupancy rate, then NHP may require more funding than has currently been allocated by HM Treasury.74 DHSC also told us that the current funding does not include hospitals scheduled to commence reconstruction in the 2020s but to complete after 2030.75 That would mean substantially more funding being required from HM Treasury to build the eight cohort 4 schemes that were recently delayed into the 2030s.76
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that NHP plans and costs should be realistic, stating it is keeping assumptions under constant review and will include specific funding for pre-2030 costs of schemes completing after 2030 within the new programme business case, due for approval by May 2024.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
35
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
The NHP team also has to manage a number of commercial risks to the programme which could impact affordability and deliverability. These include a lack of capacity in the UK construction industry, and the significant investment needed in new factory capacity for modular, offsite construction. High inflation in the construction …
Read more
The NHP team also has to manage a number of commercial risks to the programme which could impact affordability and deliverability. These include a lack of capacity in the UK construction industry, and the significant investment needed in new factory capacity for modular, offsite construction. High inflation in the construction sector (around 14% a year from May to December 2022) might also result in companies being increasingly unwilling to bear the risk of inflation in contracts.77
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that NHP plans and costs should be realistic and commits to continuing engagement with the construction industry through an extensive market engagement strategy to understand and manage capacity constraints and other commercial risks.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
36
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
We highlighted to DHSC that there seemed to be a black hole in the funding allocated compared with what would be required to get all the hospitals in the programme built, and asked whether it was discussing the issue with HM Treasury. DHSC told us that it had frequent discussions …
Read more
We highlighted to DHSC that there seemed to be a black hole in the funding allocated compared with what would be required to get all the hospitals in the programme built, and asked whether it was discussing the issue with HM Treasury. DHSC told us that it had frequent discussions with HM Treasury and considered the funding was sufficient and 71 C&AG’s Report, paras 8 and 19 72 Committee of Public Accounts, Lessons from major projects and programmes, Thirty-Ninth Report of Session 2019–21, HC 694, 29 January 2021 73 C&AG’s Report, para 13, Figure 8 and Figure 9 74 Q 73 75 Q 46 76 C&AG’s Report, para 4.2; Letter from Shona Dunn, DHSC dated 26 September 2023 77 C&AG’s Report, Figure 11 The New Hospital Programme 19 that it had taken account of optimism bias and inflation. It intended to confirm details through the full business case process.78 It said that if circumstances continued to change then DHSC would have to take account of new pressures as they arose.79 Use of consultants
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that NHP plans and costs should be realistic, and is developing a third programme business case for approval by May 2024 to secure and confirm funding, including for schemes completing after 2030, thereby addressing the committee's concern about a funding gap.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
37
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
NHP is a long-term programme with at least eight of the current schemes now due to complete sometime during the 2030s, as part of what DHSC intends will be a rolling programme.80 One of NHP’s strategic objectives is to build national capability in planning and delivering new hospitals. This is …
Read more
NHP is a long-term programme with at least eight of the current schemes now due to complete sometime during the 2030s, as part of what DHSC intends will be a rolling programme.80 One of NHP’s strategic objectives is to build national capability in planning and delivering new hospitals. This is to be achieved through a central team, the NHP team, whose functions include some previously performed in local NHS trusts with assistance from private-sector partners. It is normal for consultants to have a role to play in programmes such as NHP, where specific professional or technical expertise is required for certain activities.81 Typically a programme would aim to have a strong core team and bring in consultants to fill gaps at the margins or for short-duration tasks.82
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the NHP requires significant expertise and is actively recruiting into key internal roles while also procuring a programme delivery partner for specific external expertise, with the aim to potentially replace some external resources with directly employed individuals as the programme matures.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
38
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
In February 2023, 223 (62%) of the 361 positions in the NHP team were filled by consultants. Consultants outnumbered permanent employees by roughly two to one. Over the period from April 2021 to March 2023, £70 million (79%) of the NHP’s total day- to-day expenditure went on consultancy services.83 DHSC …
Read more
In February 2023, 223 (62%) of the 361 positions in the NHP team were filled by consultants. Consultants outnumbered permanent employees by roughly two to one. Over the period from April 2021 to March 2023, £70 million (79%) of the NHP’s total day- to-day expenditure went on consultancy services.83 DHSC told us that it had to choose between making an extremely slow start to the programme, with just those individuals it could recruit, or to start with a larger amount of external consultancy support. It told us it expected later to make a transition to a new operating model, suggesting it would rely less on external support in future.84
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the high reliance on consultants, stating it is actively recruiting for internal roles and plans to transition to a model where external resources are eventually replaced by directly employed individuals as the programme matures, supported by a recruitment strategy and a procurement …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
39
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted in Part
However, DHSC’s actual plans seem to contradict this, indicating an ongoing reliance on external delivery partners to provide professional and technical skills and for specific assignments. It estimates that it will spend £842 million on consultancy services between 2023–24 and 2030–31, which represents 75% of its total day-to-day expenditure for …
Read more
However, DHSC’s actual plans seem to contradict this, indicating an ongoing reliance on external delivery partners to provide professional and technical skills and for specific assignments. It estimates that it will spend £842 million on consultancy services between 2023–24 and 2030–31, which represents 75% of its total day-to-day expenditure for those years.85 Such a reliance in a long-term programme can be very expensive as well as risking a lack of continuity and loss of knowledge.86 DHSC said that many of the consultants would always be necessary but, having firmed up the scope of the programme, it was now starting to recruit towards the planned operating model.87 Transfers of capital funding
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need for external expertise and the ongoing role of a programme delivery partner, but states it is actively recruiting for internal roles with a view that some external resources may eventually be replaced by directly employed staff as the programme matures, …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
40
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Accepted
This committee has highlighted many times in the years since 2016 that DHSC has focused on short-term survival of NHS services, while neglecting long-term sustainability, 78 Qq 49–51 79 Q 94 80 Q 91; C&AG’s Report, para 4.2 81 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.17 and 3.19 82 Q 109 83 Q …
Read more
This committee has highlighted many times in the years since 2016 that DHSC has focused on short-term survival of NHS services, while neglecting long-term sustainability, 78 Qq 49–51 79 Q 94 80 Q 91; C&AG’s Report, para 4.2 81 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.17 and 3.19 82 Q 109 83 Q 109; C&AG’s Report, para 18 84 Qq 109, 110 85 C&AG’s Report, para 18 86 Q 110; C&AG’s Report, para 18 87 Q 110 20 The New Hospital Programme and has criticised DHSC’s lack of long-term planning for capital investment.88 A key aspect of this has been the diversion of the NHS’s planned capital funding to meet daytoday funding pressures: DHSC diverted £4.3 billion of capital funding in this way from 2014–15 to 2018–19.89 Under-investment in the NHS estate partly caused the record maintenance backlog of £10.2 billion in 2021–22, which was twice as high as in 2013–14.90 In February 2023, we again warned about the increasingly decrepit condition of much of the NHS estate, the escalating maintenance backlog, and how DHSC seemed unable to make timely decisions to address these problems.91 This Committee has also reported before that Accounting Officers only rarely flag concerns they have about value for money using the formal mechanism of seeking a ministerial direction, which would alert Parliament to high-risk decisions.92
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it is providing record capital funding to the NHS and that decisions to switch capital budgets are only made in exceptional circumstances, following usual processes for Ministerial advice and HM Treasury approval. It commits to providing more certainty for NHS capital through …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
41
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
In written evidence, the NHS Confederation also highlighted to us that the NHS was suffering because of the under-investment in capital. It said this was hampering productivity and efficiency at a time when record numbers of adults were unable to work owing to ill health and progress needed to be …
Read more
In written evidence, the NHS Confederation also highlighted to us that the NHS was suffering because of the under-investment in capital. It said this was hampering productivity and efficiency at a time when record numbers of adults were unable to work owing to ill health and progress needed to be made on the long NHS waiting lists.93 According to the NHS Constitution, NHS providers are required to comply with legal requirements to deliver care in a clean, secure and suitable environment that is properly maintained. Parts of the NHS estate do not meet the demands of a modern health service.94
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged the Committee's findings on under-investment in NHS capital, stating it provides record amounts of capital and is committed to providing more certainty through rolling investment programmes.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
42
Conclusion
First Report - The New Hospital Program…
Acknowledged
We asked DHSC whether NHP would affect the maintenance backlog. DHSC told us that the programme would help to address the backlog because around a third of the reported backlog was at sites that would be redeveloped or replaced by an NHP scheme. NHS England accepted that there would be …
Read more
We asked DHSC whether NHP would affect the maintenance backlog. DHSC told us that the programme would help to address the backlog because around a third of the reported backlog was at sites that would be redeveloped or replaced by an NHP scheme. NHS England accepted that there would be some interim spending on the maintenance of buildings that would be replaced, but also noted that this might be necessary for patient and safety care.95 88 Committee of Public Accounts, Sustainability and financial performance of acute hospital trusts, Thirtieth Report of Session 2015–16, HC 709, 15 March 2016; Committee of Public Accounts, Financial sustainability of the NHS, Forty-third Report of Session 2016–17, HC 887, 27 February 2017; Committee of Public Accounts, Sustainability and transformation in the NHS; Twenty-Ninth Report of Session 2017–19, HC 793, 27 March 2018; Committee of Public Accounts, NHS financial sustainability: progress review, Ninety-First Report of Session 2017–19, HC 1743, 3 April 2019; Committee of Public Accounts, NHS capital expenditure and financial management, Eighth Report of Session 2019–21, HC 344, 8 July 2020. 89 C&AG’s Report, para 5 90 C&AG’s Report, para 5 91 Committee of Public Accounts, Introducing Integrated Care Systems, Thirty-Fifth Report of Session 2022–23, HC 47, 8 February 2023 92 House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts report, Accountability to Parliament for taxpayers’ money, Thirty-Ninth Report of Session 2015–26 [summary], HC 732, 4 May 2016 93 NHP0004 94 C&AG’s Report, para 1.2 95 Qq 86, 90 The New Hospital Programme 21
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged the Committee's observations regarding the New Hospital Programme and maintenance backlog, reiterating its commitment to capital investment and providing record funding for the NHS.
Read full response →
HM Treasury