Recommendations & Conclusions
16 items
4
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
In seeking further investment in the programme, HMRC has not been open enough about the substantial costs that Making Tax Digital will impose on many taxpayers. In 2021, HMRC published research that showed customers will incur both upfront transitional costs and ongoing costs when Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment …
Read more
In seeking further investment in the programme, HMRC has not been open enough about the substantial costs that Making Tax Digital will impose on many taxpayers. In 2021, HMRC published research that showed customers will incur both upfront transitional costs and ongoing costs when Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment is introduced. It expects complying with the programme to cost taxpayers on average £330 upfront, with some facing costs close to £1,000. However, HMRC excluded £1.5 billion in upfront transitional costs for customers in its cost- benefit analysis in its business case seeking further investment for the programme in May 2022. It also excluded upfront transitional costs of £640 million in its 2023 business case which was also seeking further funding. Its latest figures indicate business taxpayers could have to pay a total of more than £1.9 billion to comply Progress with Making Tax Digital 7 with the new arrangements over the first five years, including £1.2 billion if the programme is extended to self-employed businesses and landlords with incomes between £10,000 and £30,000. HMRC has not said how many customers will face the highest transitional costs and how this varies for each income bracket. We are concerned about how much Making Tax Digital could cost customers. It is essential that HMRC is fully transparent in future about both the costs and benefits of the programme to both the public purse and to customers. Recommendation 4: Before finalising its proposals to extend Making Tax Digital to lower income taxpayers, HMRC should: • fully reassess the costs for customers to comply with Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment, taking account for inflation and any significant design changes made when finalising its plans; and • Use this to prepare a robust updated business case for Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agreed and stated HMRC has already reassessed customer costs for Making Tax Digital, which will be published in a Tax Information and Impact Note in Q4 2023-24. The next business case iteration will fully update on costs and benefits, ensuring all customer costs …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
5
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
HMRC’s poor track record of repeated delays to the Making Tax Digital programme and its lack of conviction in its latest timetable gives us little confidence that it will deliver the rest of the programme on time. HMRC’s original delivery timetable for the programme was not realistic and did not …
Read more
HMRC’s poor track record of repeated delays to the Making Tax Digital programme and its lack of conviction in its latest timetable gives us little confidence that it will deliver the rest of the programme on time. HMRC’s original delivery timetable for the programme was not realistic and did not reflect the scale of work required. There remains significant uncertainty about whether HMRC can deliver the remainder of the Making Tax Digital programme on time. The programme has experienced multiple issues that HMRC did not foresee, and further risks could emerge as the programme progresses. HMRC’s current plan for the introduction of Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment shows it needs to deliver many elements in parallel, such as raising awareness, pilot development and testing, and staff training. There is a lack of confidence in the programme among stakeholders. With major uncertainty remaining over its design choices, HMRC will have less time to work through and test the technical solutions, such as how data security will be achieved for taxpayers with multiple agents or how a free service will work for those with the simplest affairs. HMRC asserts that its new timetable allows for unanticipated design issues and policy announcements, but it would not rule out further delays to the programme due to unforeseen circumstances. HMRC has set itself a target of April 2025 to be ready for a near-unrestricted voluntary pilot of 1.6 million Self Assessment taxpayers with incomes over £30,000, leaving it less than two years to be ready. HMRC has yet to decide how it will communicate the changes required in Self Assessment to its customers. Recommendation 5a: HMRC should, as part of its Treasury Minute response, explain how it will assure itself that the timetable and budget for Making Tax Digital for Self Assessment is realistic and how it will use independent technical assurance and other sources of evidence to provide this assurance. b) If further changes to the delivery t
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agreed and stated that the MTD for ITSA timetable was set following detailed internal planning and shared detailed plans/roadmaps with external partners. HMRC has also sought feedback on communication plans and is supporting beta testing to ensure preparedness.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
6
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
We are concerned that the repeated delays and poor design of the Self Assessment phase of the programme is deterring software providers from developing quality 8 Progress with Making Tax Digital products and will ultimately put customers at risk. Over 500 software products are available for Making Tax Digital for …
Read more
We are concerned that the repeated delays and poor design of the Self Assessment phase of the programme is deterring software providers from developing quality 8 Progress with Making Tax Digital products and will ultimately put customers at risk. Over 500 software products are available for Making Tax Digital for VAT, which can make it difficult for customers to make an informed choice about what to use. It also makes it hard for HMRC to conduct timely reviews of the quality of products and legitimacy of the providers. Stakeholders report that some software available has unexplained features that can lead to incorrect reporting. Customers can feel overwhelmed, and stakeholders have raised concerns about the security and safety of the products on offer, as well as some unexplained features and hidden costs. HMRC expects the number of software products for VAT to reduce but could not tell us whether it plans to introduce further quality measures to ensure software meets its accreditation standards. Delays and uncertainty to the Self Assessment rollout have likely played a role in software providers becoming increasingly hesitant to continue their investments into developing products for the programme. This has led to some providers pulling products from the market or reducing their investment in developing products for Self Assessment. We are concerned that these delays and attrition amongst software providers could result in higher prices or lower the quality of product on offer to taxpayers. HMRC’s lack of proper accreditation checks leaves us concerned about where responsibility and liability fall in the event of software or cyber security failures. HMRC did not say who would be liable if something went wrong but does not expect to penalise customers if there was an error in their tax submissions because of a software issue. Recommendation 6a: HMRC should, within three months, write to the Committee and set out how it will ensure that it strikes the right balance b
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirms it does not accredit software but operates a recognition process. It commits to listing approved software on a "Software Choices webpage" before MTD for ITSA and states it can remove problematic software from its systems, fulfilling the committee's request for how it …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
1
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) on the issue of its progress with Making Tax Digital.1
Government response AI summary
The government details existing robust governance processes for the Making Tax Digital programme, including Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) accountabilities, quarterly reports, and significant internal scrutiny mechanisms.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
8
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
Delivering the programme for Self Assessment is much more complex than for VAT. There are an estimated 11 million Self Assessment tax records that will need to be quality checked and moved to HMRC’s new system, 7.8 million more than for VAT.17 The calculation of an income tax liability has …
Read more
Delivering the programme for Self Assessment is much more complex than for VAT. There are an estimated 11 million Self Assessment tax records that will need to be quality checked and moved to HMRC’s new system, 7.8 million more than for VAT.17 The calculation of an income tax liability has more components than VAT, and can include reliefs and adjustments on an annual basis. HMRC launched a pilot in April 2017 to enable developers to test and develop software. It forecast that 15,500 business taxpayers would join the pilot by 2021–22 but struggled to secure eligible participants. HMRC told us it had increased the pilot for Self Assessment participant numbers to 137 in 2023. We therefore asked HMRC what had happened with the pilot and why it had resulted in so few participants. It acknowledged numbers were low, but said early stages were for technical development and to test all elements of the customer journey.18 We received written evidence from the Institute of Charted Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) which noted that up to April 2022, almost all the focus of HMRC’s programme team was on VAT.19 We also received written evidence from Cirrostratus Exedra Ltd that said the Self Assessment testing functionality was not workable, and did not allow developers to test their products fully worked with HMRC’s new system.20 We asked HMRC how it felt it was progressing with digital change compared to its international counterparts. HMRC told us that while it is content with the services it provided compared to other international tax authorities, it had concerns about the speed at which it implemented change. HMRC acknowledged that it must speed up its implementation of digital services in order to keep up with international developments.21 12 Qq28–29 13 Qq 17, 30, C&AG’s Report para, 2.25, Figure 3 14 Q 51 15 Qq 24, 30, 31 16 Q 30 17 Q 22; C&AG’s Report, para 1.15 18 Qq 22, 40, 43 C&AG’s Report, paras 13, 2.19 – 2.20 19 PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Inst
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the committee’s implicit recommendation to address delivery challenges, stating that it has already implemented measures. HMRC has assured its MTD delivery plan, secured funding, and is developing contingency plans, and has commissioned a data quality assessment for Self-Assessment records.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
19
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
HMRC originally expected that Making Tax Digital would reduce the burden of submitting tax returns on customers. In June 2023, the NAO reported that HMRC now forecast that complying with the programme will create additional costs for customers, and that it had significantly understated these costs in its cost-benefit analysis …
Read more
HMRC originally expected that Making Tax Digital would reduce the burden of submitting tax returns on customers. In June 2023, the NAO reported that HMRC now forecast that complying with the programme will create additional costs for customers, and that it had significantly understated these costs in its cost-benefit analysis in recent business cases seeking further investment in the programme.44 In 2021, HMRC published research that showed that upfront transitional costs for Self Assessment customers with incomes above £10,000 would be around £1.4 billion, and net ongoing costs would be around £150 million a year. HMRC excluded £1.5 billion in upfront transactional costs for Self Assessment and VAT customers in its cost-benefit analysis for its May 2022 business case seeking further investment for the programme. It also excluded upfront transitional costs of £640 million in its 2023 business case.45
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has agreed to reassess and publish customer costs for MTD for ITSA, including them in the net present value calculation of future business cases as per NAO recommendations. This follows recent design changes and revised income thresholds for the program.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
20
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
We asked HMRC why it omitted significant costs from the cost-benefit analysis it included in its May 2022 business case, and whether the decisions made on the basis of the business case would have been the same if this information had been included. HMRC said that it had made “a …
Read more
We asked HMRC why it omitted significant costs from the cost-benefit analysis it included in its May 2022 business case, and whether the decisions made on the basis of the business case would have been the same if this information had been included. HMRC said that it had made “a technical interpretation error in how to apply customer costs and 39 Qq 42, 45, 67–68, 71; PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023; C&AG’s Report, para 3.29 40 Q42 41 PTD0012, Written evidence submitted by Low Incomes Tax Reform Group, 19 June 2023 42 Q 66; PTD0013, Written evidence submitted by the Business Application Software Developers Association, 19 June 2023 43 Q 66 44 Qq 54–64 ; C&AG’s Report, paras 2, 15 45 C&AG’s Report, paras 3.12–13.18 16 Progress with Making Tax Digital transition costs in the business case”. HMRC told us that it had applied this to the financial case, whereas the NAO had highlighted to it that HM Treasury’s Green Book stated that these costs should have been reflected in the economic case for the programme. It said that while it did not carry the figure through to the right analytical tables in the business case, in accordance with the Green Book, it did estimate customer costs. It asserted that part of the confusion was due to the fact that one of the main drivers for the programme was the additional tax revenue that it would bring, and that it did not consider it to be possible to use the Green Book economic case to make decisions about the programme because the Green Book ignores additional tax revenues. Despite this, HMRC told us that it was confident that decisions about spending on the programme were correct throughout and took account of all the relevant information.46
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees to reassess and publish MTD customer costs and ensure all estimates are included in the Net Present Value calculation of future business cases, addressing the committee's observation of past omissions due to 'technical interpretation error'.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
21
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
HMRC did not assess how many businesses would face different upfront transitional costs and was unable to say how many customers will face the highest upfront transitional costs or how this would vary for each income bracket. The average cost for all taxpayers affected by Making Tax Digital was expected …
Read more
HMRC did not assess how many businesses would face different upfront transitional costs and was unable to say how many customers will face the highest upfront transitional costs or how this would vary for each income bracket. The average cost for all taxpayers affected by Making Tax Digital was expected to be £330, but was expected to be £460 for businesses that had Self Assessment incomes of between £10,000 and £30,000. However, HMRC’s highest estimate of the cost to get ready for the requirements of the programme are close to £1,000 in total.47 We therefore asked the Department what it was doing to let taxpayers know what costs to expect so that they could plan for these. It told us that it wanted to be as transparent as possible about the costs of the programme for customers, and that it had a “very strong communications plan”. It explained that the costs it published tended to be upper-range costs. HMRC told us that it wanted to be “really clear on our messaging” and that it would be ready to share these messages very soon, with a “very firm warming-up campaign so customers are aware”.48
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has agreed to reassess customer costs for MTD and publish these estimates in a Tax Information and Impact Note in Q4 2023-24, to increase transparency and inform taxpayers of expected costs.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
22
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
In December 2022 Ministers took the decision to delay the inclusion of taxpayers with Self Assessment incomes below £30,000 in Making Tax Digital due to concerns about customer costs and burdens. Many of HMRC’s stakeholders have welcomed this decision.49 However, HMRC could not tell us its plans to provide specific …
Read more
In December 2022 Ministers took the decision to delay the inclusion of taxpayers with Self Assessment incomes below £30,000 in Making Tax Digital due to concerns about customer costs and burdens. Many of HMRC’s stakeholders have welcomed this decision.49 However, HMRC could not tell us its plans to provide specific support to those taxpayers with lower incomes, or who are more vulnerable, except for those who may be entitled to an exemption from being mandated.50 HMRC also said it would now need to stratify the customer costs and burden information it held for those with incomes over £10,000 into HMRC’s new income groupings for those with incomes over £50,000, those between £30,000 and £50,000 and those below £30,000.51 HMRC said it still needs to test if the additional financial and administrative burden is likely to be higher for those at the bottom end of the income scale.52
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has established an expert panel to consult on digital improvement ideas and provide specific support for vulnerable or digitally excluded customers, addressing the committee's concern about a lack of plans for these groups.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
23
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
Overall, HMRC’s latest figures indicated that if mandatory requirements were extended to those with incomes above £10,000, then business taxpayers could have to pay 46 Qq 64–65 47 Q 78; C&AG’s Report, paras 3.12–3.13 48 Qq 90–91 49 Q 65; PTD0002, Rossmartin Tax Consultancy Limited, 19 June 2023; PTD0006, Written …
Read more
Overall, HMRC’s latest figures indicated that if mandatory requirements were extended to those with incomes above £10,000, then business taxpayers could have to pay 46 Qq 64–65 47 Q 78; C&AG’s Report, paras 3.12–3.13 48 Qq 90–91 49 Q 65; PTD0002, Rossmartin Tax Consultancy Limited, 19 June 2023; PTD0006, Written evidence submitted by the Association of Taxation Technicians, 19 June 2023; PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023; PTD0008, Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation, 19 June 2023; PTD0011, Written evidence submitted by the Association of Independent Professionals and the Self-Employed, 19 June 2023, PTD0012, Written evidence submitted by Low Incomes Tax Reform Group, 19 June 2023 50 Qq 25, 45, 76 C&AG’s Report, para 3.31 51 Q79 52 Qq 79, 90 Progress with Making Tax Digital 17 a total of £1.9 billion to comply with the new arrangements over the first five years. This includes: £102 million customer costs it included in its cost-benefit analysis in its March 2023 programme business case; £640 million of customer costs it excluded from its cost- benefit analysis; and a provisional estimate of £1.2 billion for customers with incomes between £10,000 and £30,000.53 HMRC recognised the additional burden on customers that the programme creates, but told us that it expected everyone to comply with their tax obligations. It says that those who met the threshold for mandatory record keeping will have to either “grin and bear it” and do it themselves, or pay someone else to do it for them, but that it hoped that the software products available will make this easier for people than it otherwise would have been.54 53 C&AG’s Report, para 3.18 and Figure 7 54 Q 98 18 Progress with Making Tax Digital 3 The future delivery and remaining risks of Making Tax Digital HMRC’s revised timetable and contingency
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has announced changes to simplify the design of MTD for ITSA and reassessed customer costs, with new estimates to be published in a Tax Information and Impact Note, addressing the committee's concerns about the burden on taxpayers.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
25
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
In order to deliver the programme, HMRC still has: some difficult design issues to work out and fix; to fully run an unrestricted pilot to test systems and customer journeys; to test, cleanse and move Self Assessment taxpayer data in time for that pilot and mandation; and build in time …
Read more
In order to deliver the programme, HMRC still has: some difficult design issues to work out and fix; to fully run an unrestricted pilot to test systems and customer journeys; to test, cleanse and move Self Assessment taxpayer data in time for that pilot and mandation; and build in time and rebuild trust to allow software developers to get products developed for the programme to work. In answer to our question about how much support there would be for customers who entered the Self Assessment pilot for Making Tax Digital, HMRC recognised that to meet the goal of having full functionality on the programme by 2024, it still needed to make sure the programme is sufficiently functional so that the cost of supporting the pilot is manageable. HMRC acknowledged it had not yet finalised its design of the programme for Self Assessment, and it still needed to build sufficient functionality into HMRC systems so that the programme’s technical elements can work for taxpayers and agents.58 HMRC told us that it was looking at the design of the current system and, in particular, at end-of-period statements. It said it was going back to the strategic reason why it wanted this end-of-period statement in the design, which was to keep taxpayer records up to date so that they are “less likely to make mistakes or forget 55 House of Commons, Statement UIN HCWS465, HM Revenue & Customs Update – Statement by The Financial Secretary to the Treasury, 19 December 2022 56 Qq 24, 27, 30–31; C&AG’s Report para 3.3 57 Qq 80–81, 84–86 58 Qq 27, 44 Progress with Making Tax Digital 19 things” and “are likely to be more accurate”. It said that it was still planning how the customer journey and the use of real-time information would work through third-party software.59 We asked HMRC if it had experts from outside the department involved in the design for essential technical advice. HMRC explained that it had a number of external forums, and that on particular design issues, it would sit down with taxpay
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has implemented specific design changes for MTD, including a revised customer journey for jointly-held property and a commitment to allow multiple agents by April 2026, and updated eligibility criteria for beta testing, addressing outstanding design and pilot issues.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
26
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
We also received written evidence that highlighted some significant areas that needed design and technical solutions before the programme can be delivered.63 ICAEW’s written evidence said that currently the criteria for joining the pilot were too restrictive – which meant that HMRC could not expand its testing beyond basic functions …
Read more
We also received written evidence that highlighted some significant areas that needed design and technical solutions before the programme can be delivered.63 ICAEW’s written evidence said that currently the criteria for joining the pilot were too restrictive – which meant that HMRC could not expand its testing beyond basic functions for the simplest taxpayer examples. HMRC told us that it had not yet found a solution for taxpayers who have joint ownership of property, which the NAO and ICAEW said might occur where they need to account for the profits on that property differently.64 We asked HMRC to explain why it had not fixed the issues identified for customers with multiple agents. HMRC explained that for taxpayers that use more than one accountant (for example, a bookkeeper and an end-of-year accountant), it was still working out how to allow both of these parties access to their client’s data and records. HMRC explained that it was also working on the issue of user traceability for customers with agents doing submissions for them.65 HMRC could not tell us how many taxpayers this outstanding design and data security issue would affect. HMRC told us it now had a list of issues it is working through, and it was trying to work out which ones are most urgent and complex that need fixing upfront and which can be left to a later date.66
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has addressed key design and technical issues for MTD, including a revised journey for jointly-held property, updated pilot eligibility criteria, and a commitment to allow multiple agents by April 2026.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
27
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
HMRC told us that it was aiming to have built sufficient functionality to be ready for an unrestricted and open pilot of the programme for Self Assessment 12 months before it is to be introduced as a mandatory requirement for the first cohort of customers in 2026 (for those with …
Read more
HMRC told us that it was aiming to have built sufficient functionality to be ready for an unrestricted and open pilot of the programme for Self Assessment 12 months before it is to be introduced as a mandatory requirement for the first cohort of customers in 2026 (for those with incomes over £50,000). It said that this would allow people to voluntarily join before mandation if they wanted to. HMRC explained that it planned to encourage the second group (those with incomes between £30,000 and £50,000) to voluntarily join the programme’s pilot before mandatory requirements come into force in April 2027. 59 Q 48 60 Q 68 61 PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023 62 C&AG’s Report, para 3.29 63 PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023 and PTD0008, Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation, 19 June 2023 64 Q 59; PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023; PTD0008, Written evidence submitted by the Chartered Institute of Taxation, 19 June 2023; C&AG’s Report para 3.25 65 Qq 56, 58 66 Qq 60–63, 67 20 Progress with Making Tax Digital HMRC said that it wanted to make sure that everyone who was in scope for mandation in both periods was migrated to the new system as soon as possible and that it aimed to open it up on a voluntary basis for both income groups in 2025.67
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has updated eligibility criteria for the MTD beta testing phase and committed to continuing private beta testing in 2024-25 and a public beta in 2025-26, aligning with HMRC's plans for an unrestricted pilot.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
28
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
A significant task for HMRC is to move taxpayer data from its old Self Assessment system to its new tax system. HMRC told us that its old legacy systems hold records in a fundamentally different way, and it had expected the conversion into the new system to be simpler than …
Read more
A significant task for HMRC is to move taxpayer data from its old Self Assessment system to its new tax system. HMRC told us that its old legacy systems hold records in a fundamentally different way, and it had expected the conversion into the new system to be simpler than it proved to be for VAT. HMRC had learned this from its experience from the programme’s rollout for VAT and had then had to change its assumptions as it moved towards planning the Self Assessment phase. HMRC told us it was expecting that at least 30% of its Self Assessment taxpayer records would need manual work in order to ensure taxpayer data were moved to the new system correctly. HMRC had not yet started the data migration for Self Assessment, but it was planning to move 1.6 million taxpayer records—which covers the first two cohorts for Self Assessment—before those taxpayers start enrolling on the Making Tax Digital programme.68 Working with software providers
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has commissioned a data quality assessment of Self-Assessment data held on legacy systems by specialist companies, providing technical assurance for the significant and complex task of moving taxpayer records.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
29
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
We heard from HMRC and written submissions from the programme’s stakeholders, including those from the software industry, that a key requirement for the success of the programme was for HMRC to work effectively with the software industry.69 Software providers told us they had struggled to design products for more complex …
Read more
We heard from HMRC and written submissions from the programme’s stakeholders, including those from the software industry, that a key requirement for the success of the programme was for HMRC to work effectively with the software industry.69 Software providers told us they had struggled to design products for more complex customer scenarios due to restrictions HMRC imposed on pilot entrants and its product testing facility.70 Evidence sent to us by APARI Software Ltd said that despite the Self Assessment pilot running for five years, it had failed to deliver the scale and testing needed for proper product development and therefore a lot of the new technology HMRC had invested in (to allow Making Tax Digital to work) had so far not been used or tested.71
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the conclusion, stating it has already implemented a response by detailing existing end-to-end service guides for software developers that are continuously reviewed. HMRC is also reviewing minimum functionality standards to foster innovation and adapts its approach based on stakeholder feedback.
Read full response →
HM Treasury
32
Conclusion
Eightieth Report - Progress with Making…
Accepted
HMRC told us that it accredits Making Tax Digital software products so that someone selecting that product knows it has been tested against HMRC systems and if they use it correctly it will successfully submit their information. It also provides information about the costs and the functionality within those product …
Read more
HMRC told us that it accredits Making Tax Digital software products so that someone selecting that product knows it has been tested against HMRC systems and if they use it correctly it will successfully submit their information. It also provides information about the costs and the functionality within those product to help businesses decide which product to select.78 In answer to our questions around software authorisation and certification, HMRC told us that it currently listed over 500 software products for VAT and explained that whilst it tried to keep the list up to date, it relied on software companies to notify HMRC if software no longer met the programme’s requirements. HMRC expects the number of software products for VAT to reduce but could not tell us whether it plans to introduce further quality measures to ensure software meets its 72 Qq 49–50; PTD0014, Written evidence submitted by APARI Software Ltd, 19 June 2023 73 Q 63 74 PTD0013, Written evidence submitted by the Business Application Software Developers Association, 19 June 2023 75 PTD0007, Written evidence submitted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants England and Wales, 19 June 2023, PTD0014, Written evidence submitted by APARI Software Ltd, 19 June 2023 76 PTD0013, Written evidence submitted by the Business Application Software Developers Association, 19 June 2023 77 Q 63 78 Q73 22 Progress with Making Tax Digital accreditation standards.79 Many customers have said they feel overwhelmed when having to choose software from HMRC’s website for Making Tax Digital for VAT due to the amount available.80 There have been quality issues with some of the software listed on HMRC’s website. In its written evidence to us, Rossmartin Tax Consultancy Limited told us that one of its clients used listed software that allowed them to produce something completely incorrect, and another said their software choice had unexplained features that allowed double income reporting.81 Coachbuilt Cards Ltd also told us t
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees with the conclusion, clarifying that HMRC operates a 'production approvals process' rather than accreditation for software, based on API specifications and testing. It states approved MTD for ITSA software will be listed on a Software Choices webpage and details existing processes for …
Read full response →
HM Treasury