Source · Select Committees · Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Recommendation 18

18 Not Addressed

Victims of TNR often take considerable personal risk in reporting TNR related crimes.

Conclusion
Victims of TNR often take considerable personal risk in reporting TNR related crimes. Many choose not to come forward due to a lack of confidence in existing reporting systems, concerns that have often been shaped by previous negative experiences. Establishing a dedicated reporting mechanism could play a vital role in building trust within affected communities. If individuals knew their reports would be handled by trained, sensitive personnel who understand TNR and the potential risks victims face even in coming forward to report it, more victims may feel safe and supported enough to seek help. (Conclusion, Paragraph 61) 43
Government response summary AI-generated
The government's response discusses the design, scrutiny, and legal framework of sanctions, but does not address the committee's conclusion about the importance of establishing a dedicated reporting mechanism for victims of transnational repression.
Summary of the government's response below — read the verbatim text to verify.
Government Response Not Addressed
HM Government · verbatim extract Not Addressed
1. The Government is committed to ensuring that individuals who believe they may be victims of TNR have access to clear, trusted, and effective mechanisms for reporting concerns and receiving support. The Defending Democracy Taskforce’s Review carefully considered, in consultation with CTP, how best to encourage reporting and ensure that reports are treated seriously and dealt with appropriately. 2. CTP keep the means and mechanisms for engaging and building community confidence and effective police response under continuous review. As discussed with the Committee, CTP’s assessment, developed in conjunction with the Government, is that the 999 and 101 lines are the most widely known and easily accessible means of contacting policing, ensuring that handlers can assess and provide the most appropriate level of assistance, which, when required, can be immediate. This also allows calls to be assessed and referred for further action to specialists depending on the nature of the crime – which includes state threats. 3. Existing police hotlines and reporting mechanisms also include provisions to access translators to assist callers who may not be able to communicate in English, and CTP’s work to increase awareness and confidence in reporting across policing includes outreach to and through translation services. CTP is also seeking to increase understanding of TNR among those providing translation services for policing. 4. CTP continue to work with call handlers across policing to ensure that all reports potentially including state threats are flagged to specialist teams for assessment, while also ensuring the local force takes immediate action if and where required. 5. CTP believes that introducing a bespoke reporting hotline for TNR would be duplicative and potentially cause confusion. There is a risk it might be unclear what number individuals should call and when, and such a system could undermine the clarity and effectiveness of existing mechanisms. Given the targeted and specific nature of TNR in the UK, expected call volumes would be low, and the resource investment required to establish and maintain a separate hotline would not be proportionate. 6. Moreover, a dedicated hotline risks reinforcing the perception that TNR is widespread or ubiquitous, which could inadvertently spread fear, encourage false reporting, or be misused as a surveillance tool. Our public messaging is designed to be proportionate and protective, and our reporting systems are structured to ensure that police - not the public - triage cases and assess threat levels. 7. The Government will continue to work with policing to strengthen awareness, confidence, and capability in responding to TNR, while ensuring that our approach remains proportionate, effective, and focused on protecting those most at risk.
Read the full response on Parliament ↗