Select Committee · Human Rights (Joint Committee)

Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill

Status: Closed Opened: 14 Mar 2025 Closed: 31 Oct 2025 33 recommendations 85 conclusions 1 report

The Joint Committee on Human Rights is conducting legislative scrutiny of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill to assess its compatibility with international and domestic human rights standards. The Government’s stated purpose for the Bill is to improve UK border security and strengthen the asylum and immigration system by creating a framework of new …

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Border Security, Asylum … HC 789 20 Jun 2025 118 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
80 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

Whilst the Home Office may issue guidance about the use of the powers and training...

Whilst the Home Office may issue guidance about the use of the powers and training that will be required for authorised officers exercising those powers, any such guidance is not available for Parliamentary scrutiny during the passage of this Bill.

Government response. The government reiterates the safeguards in place for search and seizure powers and mentions forthcoming non-statutory guidance, but it does not address the committee's specific concern about this guidance not being available for Parliamentary scrutiny during the Bill's passage.
Ministry of Justice
106 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever...

Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever possible, victims of trafficking are identified before any decisions are made on charge and prosecution; this is particularly important where the suspect is a child and reflects the findings of the ECtHR case of VCL …

Government response. The government's response outlines its commitment to retaining Section 29 of the IMA 2023 for disqualifying foreign national offenders from modern slavery protections, but does not directly address the Committee's conclusion about the importance of identifying trafficking victims before prosecution …
Ministry of Justice
107 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created...

Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created to prevent the criminalisation of survivors for offences they were compelled to commit as a result of their exploitation, After Exploitation points out that “its application is narrow and there is a lack of awareness …

Government response. The government's response focuses on the retention of section 29 of the IMA 2023, concerning disqualification from modern slavery protections for foreign national offenders, and wider modern slavery reform plans. It does not address the committee's specific concerns about the …
Ministry of Justice
109 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone...

The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone from modern slavery protections: “there is no formal route to appeal or request reconsideration and so a challenge can only be brought by judicial review, which is a limited form of review and not a …

Government response. The government's response defends the retention of Section 29 of the IMA 2023 and the public order disqualification, but it does not address the committee's specific concern regarding the limited avenues for challenging disqualification decisions.
Ministry of Justice
111 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust...

In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust in the system. There is some evidence that since 2016 the proportion of those who refuse to engage with support services has soared by 630%. Without victims engaging there is no chance of prosecution. Those …

Government response. The government response discusses the retention and compliance of section 29 of the IMA 2023 regarding modern slavery disqualification for foreign national offenders, but does not address the committee's observation about victims losing trust or low prosecution rates.
Ministry of Justice
148 Recommendation 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases...

We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases involving, amongst other things, serious international crimes. Where there is sufficient evidence that persons have been involved in serious international crimes such as genocide, such persons must be investigated and prosecuted. We reiterate the previous …

Government response. The government's response focused on its existing policies for deporting or managing foreign nationals who pose a threat or do not qualify for protection, through measures like electronic monitoring and curfews. It did not address the committee's recommendation to amend …
Ministry of Justice
153 Conclusion 4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord… Not Addressed

However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect.

However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect. Professor Sarah Singer told us: “the Nationality and Borders Act introduced a new interpretation of Article 33(2) [Refugee Convention]… It would be highly unlikely to have a case under the Sexual Offences Act that did not meet …

Government response. The government welcomed the Committee's perceived support for the clause, reiterating its commitment to classifying sexual offences as 'particularly serious' for Refugee Convention purposes, but did not address the observation that the lowered threshold may have little practical effect.
Ministry of Justice

Oral evidence sessions

1 session
Date Witnesses
14 May 2025 Alison Harvey · One Pump Court, Dr Marija Jovanovic · Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, University of Oxford, Professor Sarah Singer · Refugee Law Initiative, School of Advanced Study, University of London, Richard Alcock CBE · Border Security Command, Zoe Bantleman · Immigration Law Practitioners' Association View ↗

Correspondence

4 letters
DateDirectionTitle
30 Oct 2025 Correspondence from Lord Hanson of Flint to the Committee regarding the Border …
12 Jun 2025 Correspondence from the Chief Commissioner relating to the Border Security, Asy…
12 Jun 2025 Correspondence from the Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor, Head of CPS Internationa…
22 May 2025 Correspondence from the Committee to the Deputy Chief Prosecutor and Head of In…