Recommendations & Conclusions
7 items
80
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
Whilst the Home Office may issue guidance about the use of the powers and training that will be required for authorised officers exercising those powers, any such guidance is not available for Parliamentary scrutiny during the passage of this Bill.
Government response AI summary
The government reiterates the safeguards in place for search and seizure powers and mentions forthcoming non-statutory guidance, but it does not address the committee's specific concern about this guidance not being available for Parliamentary scrutiny during the Bill's passage.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
106
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever possible, victims of trafficking are identified before any decisions are made on charge and prosecution; this is particularly important where the suspect is a child and reflects the findings of the ECtHR case of VCL …
Read more
Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever possible, victims of trafficking are identified before any decisions are made on charge and prosecution; this is particularly important where the suspect is a child and reflects the findings of the ECtHR case of VCL and AN v The UK.” She also noted that the CPS has guidance on the application of the section 45 defence, “setting out steps that prosecutors must take when dealing with a case where the suspect or defendant might be a potential victim.”141
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response outlines its commitment to retaining Section 29 of the IMA 2023 for disqualifying foreign national offenders from modern slavery protections, but does not directly address the Committee's conclusion about the importance of identifying trafficking victims before prosecution or the CPS guidance.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
107
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created to prevent the criminalisation of survivors for offences they were compelled to commit as a result of their exploitation, After Exploitation points out that “its application is narrow and there is a lack of awareness …
Read more
Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created to prevent the criminalisation of survivors for offences they were compelled to commit as a result of their exploitation, After Exploitation points out that “its application is narrow and there is a lack of awareness of the defence amongst professionals in the criminal justice system.”143
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response focuses on the retention of section 29 of the IMA 2023, concerning disqualification from modern slavery protections for foreign national offenders, and wider modern slavery reform plans. It does not address the committee's specific concerns about the narrow application or lack of …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
109
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone from modern slavery protections: “there is no formal route to appeal or request reconsideration and so a challenge can only be brought by judicial review, which is a limited form of review and not a …
Read more
The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone from modern slavery protections: “there is no formal route to appeal or request reconsideration and so a challenge can only be brought by judicial review, which is a limited form of review and not a full reconsideration of the merits of the case.”145
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response defends the retention of Section 29 of the IMA 2023 and the public order disqualification, but it does not address the committee's specific concern regarding the limited avenues for challenging disqualification decisions.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
111
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust in the system. There is some evidence that since 2016 the proportion of those who refuse to engage with support services has soared by 630%. Without victims engaging there is no chance of prosecution. Those …
Read more
In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust in the system. There is some evidence that since 2016 the proportion of those who refuse to engage with support services has soared by 630%. Without victims engaging there is no chance of prosecution. Those are at a record low, only 58 in a whole year compared with 17,000 potential victims in the same period.”147 Compatibility with ECAT and Article 4 ECHR
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government response discusses the retention and compliance of section 29 of the IMA 2023 regarding modern slavery disqualification for foreign national offenders, but does not address the committee's observation about victims losing trust or low prosecution rates.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
148
Recommendation
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases involving, amongst other things, serious international crimes. Where there is sufficient evidence that persons have been involved in serious international crimes such as genocide, such persons must be investigated and prosecuted. We reiterate the previous …
Read more
We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases involving, amongst other things, serious international crimes. Where there is sufficient evidence that persons have been involved in serious international crimes such as genocide, such persons must be investigated and prosecuted. We reiterate the previous recommendation of this Committee in its report on Accountability for Daesh Crimes, that the International Criminal Court Act 2001 should be amended to provide for universal jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.193 We note and welcome that this recommendation was echoed by the International Development Committee in its recent report on the UK’s role in upholding international humanitarian law, which also called for legislative amendments to provide for universal jurisdiction.194
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government's response focused on its existing policies for deporting or managing foreign nationals who pose a threat or do not qualify for protection, through measures like electronic monitoring and curfews. It did not address the committee's recommendation to amend the International Criminal Court Act …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
153
Conclusion
4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Bord…
Not Addressed
However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect. Professor Sarah Singer told us: “the Nationality and Borders Act introduced a new interpretation of Article 33(2) [Refugee Convention]… It would be highly unlikely to have a case under the Sexual Offences Act that did not meet …
Read more
However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect. Professor Sarah Singer told us: “the Nationality and Borders Act introduced a new interpretation of Article 33(2) [Refugee Convention]… It would be highly unlikely to have a case under the Sexual Offences Act that did not meet that already very low bar [of a twelve months’ sentence of imprisonment].”198 Compatibility with Convention rights
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomed the Committee's perceived support for the clause, reiterating its commitment to classifying sexual offences as 'particularly serious' for Refugee Convention purposes, but did not address the observation that the lowered threshold may have little practical effect.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice