Source · Select Committees · Justice Committee

3rd Report - Leadership of the Criminal Cases Review Commission

Justice Committee HC 749 Published 23 May 2025
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
42 items (7 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 42 of 42 classified
Accepted 10
Accepted in Part 2
Acknowledged 14
Deferred 13
Not Addressed 1
Rejected 2
Filter by: Clear

Conclusions (2)

Observations and findings
13 Conclusion Accepted in Part
The Chair should have a background in criminal justice, have recognised experience in that field and, above all, be absolutely dedicated to the CCRC’s purpose of identifying miscarriages of justice and upholding its independence. (Recommendation, Paragraph 48)
Government Response Summary
The government agrees the Chair should be dedicated to the CCRC's purpose and independence, and will test these attributes during recruitment. While acknowledging previous person specifications made criminal justice experience desirable, they will seek a suitably qualified candidate with a blend of skills and will consider the interim Chair's views on essential qualities.
View Details →
20 Conclusion Accepted in Part
The forthcoming review should include an assessment of the sufficiency of the Commission’s current level of funding and what resource increases it might need in future years. (Recommendation, Paragraph 71)
Government Response Summary
The government states the interim Chair's review will evaluate the CCRC's value for money within its existing funding envelope, focusing on maximising current resources, and future resource requests will be considered.
View Details →