Select committee: Justice Committee
Recommendation 1
9th Report: Private prosecutions: safeguards
Published 2 Oct 2020
Paragraph 15
Addressed to Ministry of Justice
Justice Committee Private prosecutions: safeguards All items in this report Report on parliament.uk ↗ Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Recommendation (the committee's words)
The startling figures on the scale of the Post Office’s prosecutions, together with concerns raised by the Environmental, Food and Rural Affairs Committee in relation to the RSPCA in 2016 and reports that the number of private prosecutions is rising, justify a proactive approach to examining the effectiveness of the regulation of this area of the criminal justice system.
From: Justice Committee, 9th Report: Private prosecutions: safeguards (HC 497), paragraph 15, 2 October 2020
Government response
The government responded to the whole report on 4 March 2021 (deadline 5 December 2020).
Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.The government welcomes the report and agrees with several recommendations, including on funding and a central register, but is "not persuaded" that a binding code of standards would be proportionate and does not adopt the notification proposals.
- On funding, it agrees that costs recoverable from central funds by a private prosecutor should be capped at legal aid rates, which "will require an amendment of the existing legislation".
- It is "minded to agree" that costs recoverable from a convicted defendant should be limited, but "wish[es] to consult further on this".
- On a central register, it says establishment is "in hand and will be completed by the end of this year".
- It is "not persuaded" that a binding code or inspection regime would be proportionate, and says it "shall continue to consider" other action to improve accountability and transparency.