Recommendations & Conclusions
45 items
1
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
Although fewer children enter the youth justice system than used to be the case, those who do are more complex individuals. The cohort includes children who have mental health or substance misuse issues. Some have previously been excluded from school; many are, or have been, looked-after children. The complexity of …
Read more
Although fewer children enter the youth justice system than used to be the case, those who do are more complex individuals. The cohort includes children who have mental health or substance misuse issues. Some have previously been excluded from school; many are, or have been, looked-after children. The complexity of the issues that these children have faced, as shown in the graph above, highlights the need for a whole-system approach involving a range of public agencies beyond those of the criminal justice system, and we recommend that much greater priority be given to this in the development of future policy and practice. (Paragraph 24) Diversion from formal criminal justice processing
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomes the recommendation, stating a whole-system approach for vulnerable children is already embedded in the youth justice system through multi-agency working and frameworks like SECURE STAIRS. The Ministry of Justice and YJB will continue to work with partners to build on this system.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
2
Conclusion
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
We recognise the important role that out-of-court disposals, both formal and informal, play in diverting children from formal criminal justice processes and consider them an integral part of the youth justice system. We note that data collection on the effectiveness of such schemes is patchy at best, particularly for informal, …
Read more
We recognise the important role that out-of-court disposals, both formal and informal, play in diverting children from formal criminal justice processes and consider them an integral part of the youth justice system. We note that data collection on the effectiveness of such schemes is patchy at best, particularly for informal, non-statutory diversion schemes, which make up around 40% of all out- of-court disposals. Although data is collected on formal out-of-court disposals, we have an incomplete picture of how many children are diverted from entering the criminal justice system.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government recognizes the importance of out-of-court disposals in preventing children from entering the criminal justice system and welcomes the Committee's attention to this area.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
3
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Justice Board work together to start collecting data centrally on non-statutory, informal diversion schemes, including (but not limited to) data on how many complete a diversion scheme, the impact on reoffending, health outcomes and education outcomes.
Read more
We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Justice Board work together to start collecting data centrally on non-statutory, informal diversion schemes, including (but not limited to) data on how many complete a diversion scheme, the impact on reoffending, health outcomes and education outcomes.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees more data collection is needed and states the YJB has been collecting data on Community Resolutions and other informal outcomes with YOT intervention since April 2020. They will explore publishing this data once a full year of quality data has been collated, …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
4
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
We agree with the Chief Inspector of Probation’s recommendation that a national evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of out-of-court disposals be carried out. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice commission such an evaluation, which should consider the impact and effectiveness of formal and informal out-of-court disposals.
Read more
We agree with the Chief Inspector of Probation’s recommendation that a national evaluation of the impact and effectiveness of out-of-court disposals be carried out. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice commission such an evaluation, which should consider the impact and effectiveness of formal and informal out-of-court disposals.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees more understanding is needed regarding out-of-court disposals, noting that the YJB's data collection work and previous evaluations will improve understanding, but it does not commit to commissioning a new national evaluation as recommended.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
5
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
We note that there are inconsistencies in the provision and practice of diversion schemes across England and Wales. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Justice Board work together to set out national guidance on out-of-court disposal work. As suggested by the Centre for Justice Innovation, this guidance …
Read more
We note that there are inconsistencies in the provision and practice of diversion schemes across England and Wales. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Justice Board work together to set out national guidance on out-of-court disposal work. As suggested by the Centre for Justice Innovation, this guidance should include an evidence base for out-of-court disposals, examples of good practice and a framework for data recording.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that statutory guidance for youth out-of-court disposals already exists and is kept under review. The YJB has also published additional guidance, which is currently undergoing revision, and hosts a resource hub with best practice examples.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
6
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Rejected
There is significant support for diversion and demand for informal, non-statutory services. For diversion schemes to function well, they need to be sufficiently funded. Investment in upstream service provision should be prioritised. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice work with the Youth Justice Board to review current funding arrangements …
Read more
There is significant support for diversion and demand for informal, non-statutory services. For diversion schemes to function well, they need to be sufficiently funded. Investment in upstream service provision should be prioritised. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice work with the Youth Justice Board to review current funding arrangements and ensure that funding adequately reflects the pre-court diversionary work being carried out by youth offending teams. (Paragraph 46) Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system 47
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it has no current plans to review YOT funding levels, rejecting the recommendation. However, it acknowledges the importance of pre-court diversionary work and mentions ongoing efforts to gather data and better understand such work through a YJB project.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
7
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
We agree with the Ministry of Justice’s priority of diverting children away from the criminal justice system and support early intervention work such as Liaison and Diversion schemes. We are aware that Youth Liaison and Diversion schemes may not be included in the current evaluation taking place of adult liaison …
Read more
We agree with the Ministry of Justice’s priority of diverting children away from the criminal justice system and support early intervention work such as Liaison and Diversion schemes. We are aware that Youth Liaison and Diversion schemes may not be included in the current evaluation taking place of adult liaison and diversion schemes and recommend that the Ministry of Justice commission an evaluation into the effectiveness of Youth Liaison and Diversion schemes. This evaluation should include the number of children who have been diverted away from the criminal justice system as a result of such schemes.
Show less
Government response AI summary
NHS England and NHS Improvement welcome the recommendation and will consider the merits of undertaking a process evaluation of Youth Liaison and Diversion schemes. They are also developing plans to establish pathfinder areas to identify and promote good practice in 2021-22.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
8
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
We are aware that children coming into contact with the criminal justice system may not meet the criteria for generic child and adolescent mental health services, despite presenting with multiple needs. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice increase access to mental health support for all children and young people …
Read more
We are aware that children coming into contact with the criminal justice system may not meet the criteria for generic child and adolescent mental health services, despite presenting with multiple needs. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice increase access to mental health support for all children and young people who need it. The Ministry should set out how this will be achieved and resourced. (Paragraph 54) Minimum age of criminal responsibility
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government recognizes the importance of this issue and references the NHS Long Term Plan, which aims to expand mental health services to an additional 345,000 children and young people by 2023/24. The Ministry of Justice will work with partners to ensure children have access …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
9
Conclusion
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Rejected
The age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is a contentious issue with substantial arguments in favour both of the status quo age of 10 and an increase in that age. We are not persuaded that it should be immediately increased, but given the arguments in favour of raising …
Read more
The age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is a contentious issue with substantial arguments in favour both of the status quo age of 10 and an increase in that age. We are not persuaded that it should be immediately increased, but given the arguments in favour of raising it and the fact that the age in England and Wales is lower than in broadly comparable countries, we consider there is a case for reviewing the age of criminal responsibility.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the idea of reviewing the age of criminal responsibility, stating it has no current plans to do so and believes the current age of 10 is appropriate for children to differentiate between bad and serious wrongdoing.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
10
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Rejected
We recommend that the Ministry review the age of criminal responsibility, considering the data available from Scotland and from broadly comparable European and other jurisdictions in which the age is higher than 10 at which it stands in England and Wales. We recommend that the Ministry report on the implications …
Read more
We recommend that the Ministry review the age of criminal responsibility, considering the data available from Scotland and from broadly comparable European and other jurisdictions in which the age is higher than 10 at which it stands in England and Wales. We recommend that the Ministry report on the implications of raising the age in England and Wales to 12 and to 14, including the likely effect on reducing the number of children in custody and alternative methods of disposing of children beneath those ages who have committed serious offences. We recommend that if it concludes that 10 should remain the age of criminal responsibility, the Ministry set out the evidence and reasoning to justify an approach the Minister of State recognises as one that differs from the average. (Paragraph 65) Racial Disproportionality
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the recommendation to review the age of criminal responsibility, stating it has no plans to change it and believes children aged 10 and over can differentiate between bad and serious wrongdoing.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
11
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
We are aware of the work the Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service have done since publication of the Lammy Review to address disproportionality. The youth justice population has changed considerably in the past 10 years, but children from BAME backgrounds continue to be disproportionately represented, with outcomes getting …
Read more
We are aware of the work the Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service have done since publication of the Lammy Review to address disproportionality. The youth justice population has changed considerably in the past 10 years, but children from BAME backgrounds continue to be disproportionately represented, with outcomes getting worse in some areas. We are particularly concerned about the disproportionate number of children held in custody who are from BAME backgrounds - 51.9% of the whole cohort as of May 2020. Race disproportionality is significant and fundamental, visible in every part of the youth justice system. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice set out what resource has been allocated to addressing disproportionality. We are not convinced that disproportionality has satisfactorily been “explained or reformed”. The Ministry should also provide the Committee with detailed research setting out why these communities are so 48 Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system disproportionately represented in each part of the system, including the cause of their disproportionate imprisonment. The Ministry should set out what action is being taken and resources allocated.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government shares concerns about disproportionality and commits to understanding and tackling it, stating this is a mainstream responsibility with resources integrated throughout. They refer to existing data publications but do not commit to providing new detailed research or a specific breakdown of allocated resources.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
12
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
It is not clear whether diversion schemes disproportionately benefit White children compared with their BAME counterparts, nonetheless, the figures on first- time entrants to the system are concerning. Without centrally collected data on diversion rates, we cannot gain an accurate picture on who is being diverted and who is not, …
Read more
It is not clear whether diversion schemes disproportionately benefit White children compared with their BAME counterparts, nonetheless, the figures on first- time entrants to the system are concerning. Without centrally collected data on diversion rates, we cannot gain an accurate picture on who is being diverted and who is not, and it is therefore difficult to understand whether diversion schemes are being disproportionately used. In adopting our previous recommendation that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Justice Board work together to collect data on informal diversion schemes, the two bodies should include demographic information in that data.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees more data collection is needed and states the YJB has been collecting data on Community Resolutions and informal outcomes, including age, sex, and ethnicity, since April 2020. They will explore publishing this data once a full year of quality data is collated.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
13
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted in Part
BAME children are disproportionately remanded to custody and some of the children remanded to custody, will not then go on to receive a custodial sentence. The Youth Justice Board should update the Committee on the findings of their commissioned research. We agree with Transform Justice, that the disproportionate use of …
Read more
BAME children are disproportionately remanded to custody and some of the children remanded to custody, will not then go on to receive a custodial sentence. The Youth Justice Board should update the Committee on the findings of their commissioned research. We agree with Transform Justice, that the disproportionate use of remand has not satisfactorily been explained, and we recommend that the Ministry of Justice provide an explanation of why the levels of BAME children being remanded to custody are disproportionately high. This explanation should include comparative data on the numbers of BAME children and other pleading guilty and differences in the types of offences of which BAME children and others are accused, in particular where they are likely to result in remand in custody. The Ministry should also set out the steps it is taking to prevent unconscious bias in decision-making. (Paragraph 83) Youth Courts and Sentencing
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts disproportionality is a concern and commits to sharing the YJB's commissioned research findings on ethnic disproportionality in remand and sentencing, which aims to provide the requested explanation and data, once published. It notes judicial training on unconscious bias is under review and …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
14
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
We note that the number of children on remand is high and that two thirds of children given a remand to youth detention accommodation did not subsequently receive a custodial sentence. Multiple factors appear to contribute to these numbers: an increase in serious violence; lack of credible community alternatives; and …
Read more
We note that the number of children on remand is high and that two thirds of children given a remand to youth detention accommodation did not subsequently receive a custodial sentence. Multiple factors appear to contribute to these numbers: an increase in serious violence; lack of credible community alternatives; and limited amount of time available to put together an alternative bail package may all be contributing factors. We welcome the MOJ’s current review of youth remand, but request more detail on what that review is covering. The Ministry should also set out the timeframe in which they intend to complete the review and publish its results and any action plan.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government provides details on its ongoing review into the use of custodial remand for children, outlining an initial suite of recommendations focusing on data, practice, community provision, and disproportionality. Publication of the final report is planned for spring 2021.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
15
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Deferred
We were concerned to hear reports of children being remanded to custody pending psychiatric reports. Evidence received suggested that this is unnecessary and potentially damaging for a child. We ask the Ministry of Justice to set out how many children have been sent to custody pending a psychiatric report. We …
Read more
We were concerned to hear reports of children being remanded to custody pending psychiatric reports. Evidence received suggested that this is unnecessary and potentially damaging for a child. We ask the Ministry of Justice to set out how many children have been sent to custody pending a psychiatric report. We recommend that the Ministry set out what steps it is taking to prevent this from happening.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts in principle that prison should not be used for mental health assessments and recognizes the need for a timely pathway to transfer people to healthcare settings. However, it states that significant further work is needed before legislative change can be introduced and …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
16
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Rejected
Referral Orders may be appropriate in some circumstances, but there appears to be consensus that more flexible sentencing options would be beneficial. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice review current sentencing options for children with a view to introducing a Youth Rehabilitation Order as a sentencing option for first-time …
Read more
Referral Orders may be appropriate in some circumstances, but there appears to be consensus that more flexible sentencing options would be beneficial. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice review current sentencing options for children with a view to introducing a Youth Rehabilitation Order as a sentencing option for first-time offenders pleading guilty. (Paragraph 103) Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system 49
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects a review of sentencing options for first-time offenders, stating that Referral Orders already provide an effective tool and are more effective at reducing reoffending than Youth Rehabilitation Orders. It does not believe there is evidence to warrant a review.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
17
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Deferred
We agree that the introduction of a feedback loop between the Youth Court (magistrates and district judges) and Youth Offending Teams and the young person may help improve transparency and support rehabilitation. The Ministry of Justice should review current sentencing options, with a view to introducing a feedback loop.
Read more
We agree that the introduction of a feedback loop between the Youth Court (magistrates and district judges) and Youth Offending Teams and the young person may help improve transparency and support rehabilitation. The Ministry of Justice should review current sentencing options, with a view to introducing a feedback loop.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is aware of the value of feedback loops and will explore problem-solving approaches in the youth justice system, including building an evidence base for wider use of panels. It notes that feedback loops already exist for Referral Orders and through innovative local arrangements, …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
18
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted in Part
Delays have a fundamental impact on all those involved in proceedings. The Ministry of Justice and HMCTS should set out what is being done to specifically address delays in the youth justice system and manage any existing backlogs. The Ministry should include details on what the current capacity is in …
Read more
Delays have a fundamental impact on all those involved in proceedings. The Ministry of Justice and HMCTS should set out what is being done to specifically address delays in the youth justice system and manage any existing backlogs. The Ministry should include details on what the current capacity is in the youth courts, and what plans exist to increase capacity.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government provides data on youth outstanding cases up to June 2020 and details the work of the Youth Justice Working Group, established to reduce COVID-19 delays and backlogs. It reports that recovery plans have enabled youth courts to conclude more cases than received since …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
19
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Rejected
Under the principle that punishments should fit crimes, we are concerned that children who turn 18 while waiting for proceedings against them to begin are then dealt with and sentenced as adults. In particular, this is alarming when it happens simply because of delays in bringing cases to court. Defendants …
Read more
Under the principle that punishments should fit crimes, we are concerned that children who turn 18 while waiting for proceedings against them to begin are then dealt with and sentenced as adults. In particular, this is alarming when it happens simply because of delays in bringing cases to court. Defendants may have no control over delays, but may face profoundly different outcomes simply because a birthday has passed. There is significant potential for injustice here, and we believe that proceedings and sentencing should be carried out on the basis of the circumstances prevailing at the time the offence was committed, including the age of the offender. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice legislate to ensure that those who turn 18 while waiting for proceedings against them to begin are automatically dealt with in the youth justice system and sentenced as children.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects legislating to automatically deal with those who turn 18 in the youth justice system, arguing that age and maturity are already considered in sentencing and that efforts are underway to clear court backlogs and prioritise youth cases.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
20
Conclusion
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
Children and young people going through the court system have very distinct needs, many having neurodevelopmental and communication needs. They may not fully understand proceedings. Every opportunity must be made to ensure that children are not unfairly disadvantaged; everyone should be able to understand and fully participate in proceedings.
Read more
Children and young people going through the court system have very distinct needs, many having neurodevelopmental and communication needs. They may not fully understand proceedings. Every opportunity must be made to ensure that children are not unfairly disadvantaged; everyone should be able to understand and fully participate in proceedings.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government recognizes the importance of supporting children in the justice system. It is considering the feasibility of Law Commission recommendations on intermediaries for defendants and highlights existing support for children provided by YOTs and YJB guidance.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
21
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Deferred
We agree with the Royal Colleges’ recommendation that the Registered Intermediary Scheme be made available to vulnerable child defendants. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice set out how it will extend this scheme to ensure that children have access to adequate support. The Ministry should also set out how …
Read more
We agree with the Royal Colleges’ recommendation that the Registered Intermediary Scheme be made available to vulnerable child defendants. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice set out how it will extend this scheme to ensure that children have access to adequate support. The Ministry should also set out how all children, regardless of specific needs, are supported through the criminal justice process to ensure that they fully understand the process and are able to participate in an informed and full manner.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is currently considering the feasibility of extending the Registered Intermediary Scheme to vulnerable child defendants as part of a review of intermediary provision. It states that Youth Offending Teams currently support all children throughout the criminal justice process with robust guidance.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
22
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Deferred
The youth criminal justice system can be complex to navigate for children and young people, particularly as children reach court proceedings. We recommend that direct recruitment to the youth magistracy be introduced, which would allow magistrates to specialise in the youth justice system from the outset. We also recommend that …
Read more
The youth criminal justice system can be complex to navigate for children and young people, particularly as children reach court proceedings. We recommend that direct recruitment to the youth magistracy be introduced, which would allow magistrates to specialise in the youth justice system from the outset. We also recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service consider enabling peer advocates to have an increased role in youth court system.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that direct recruitment to the youth magistracy has been considered but not pursued due to insufficient caseload, though they will continue to explore its benefits. They are aware of peer advocates working with YOTs but do not commit to enabling an increased …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
23
Conclusion
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Acknowledged
We reiterate the importance of data collection here; backlogs have a knock-on effect on the system, and it is imperative that we understand what the current situation looks like if we are to address it going forward.
Government response AI summary
The government provides youth outstanding case data up to June 2020 but notes that official statistics post-June 2020 and 2019-2020 timeliness statistics are unavailable due to the pandemic. It details work by the Youth Justice Working Group to address backlogs, stating that youth courts have …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
24
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected every area of the criminal justice system, including youth justice. The Committee appreciate that Covid-19 has presented 50 Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system the youth courts with numerous challenges. Delays affect all participants in court proceedings; …
Read more
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected every area of the criminal justice system, including youth justice. The Committee appreciate that Covid-19 has presented 50 Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system the youth courts with numerous challenges. Delays affect all participants in court proceedings; defendants awaiting trial will spend longer in custody on remand or on bail in the community, and victims will wait longer for justice. We invite the Ministry of Justice to set out the number of outstanding cases in the youth courts and what steps are being taken to ensure that cases are dealt with expeditiously.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government provided a table of outstanding youth cases in magistrates’ and Crown Courts from January to June 2020. They also detailed steps being taken, including a Youth Justice Working Group and recovery plans, which have led to youth courts concluding more cases than received …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
25
Recommendation
12th Report: Children and Young People …
Accepted
Covid-19 has necessitated a shift to remote hearings, but we have heard concerns from witnesses about their use. We accept that this is a necessary interim measure in response to the pandemic, but the Ministry of Justice should set out what work is being done to ensure that all parties …
Read more
Covid-19 has necessitated a shift to remote hearings, but we have heard concerns from witnesses about their use. We accept that this is a necessary interim measure in response to the pandemic, but the Ministry of Justice should set out what work is being done to ensure that all parties to a proceeding are adequately supported during remote hearings. We reiterate our previous recommendation, that the Ministry should urgently commission a review that evaluates the effect of Covid-19 measures in the magistrates’ courts and the Crown Court. This review should also consider the specific effect Covid-19 measures have had on access to justice and fairness of outcomes for children and young people. (Paragraph 139) Children and Young People in Custody (Part 1): Entry into the youth justice system 51
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights existing guidance and arrangements for remote hearings to support parties. It confirms that the Ministry of Justice and HMCTS are conducting an evaluation of remote hearing impacts, with findings due in spring 2021, and are working to address COVID-19 backlogs in youth …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
1
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Deferred
Throughout this inquiry, we have heard of significant concerns about the use of separation across the youth estate - the effect it has on the individual and on the institution itself. Concerns around the use of separation in the youth secure estate are of long standing. We find it unacceptable …
Read more
Throughout this inquiry, we have heard of significant concerns about the use of separation across the youth estate - the effect it has on the individual and on the institution itself. Concerns around the use of separation in the youth secure estate are of long standing. We find it unacceptable that data on separation in Young Offender Institutions is not gathered and published and recommend that the Ministry of Justice rectify this immediately. We find it unacceptable that data on separation in Young Offender Institutions is not gathered and published and recommend that the Ministry of Justice rectify this immediately.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the need to collect and publish data on separation in YOIs, stating it has been capturing data since December 2019 and expects to begin publishing this data quarterly from the 2022/23 financial year onwards, pending a policy review.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
2
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
The findings of HM Inspectorate of Prisons’ report on separation are serious and echo much of what has been reported in evidence to us and in other publications. We are concerned about differences in practice across the estate. The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service should set out what …
Read more
The findings of HM Inspectorate of Prisons’ report on separation are serious and echo much of what has been reported in evidence to us and in other publications. We are concerned about differences in practice across the estate. The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service should set out what is being done to ensure coherent and consistent practice across the estate.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details immediate actions already taken by the YCS, including introducing a national single point of contact and publishing an action plan in January 2020, and states that a taskforce was established to review the separation model, with work progressing on a new framework.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
3
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We note the frustration of HM Inspectorate of Prisons about the extent to which its recommendations for action are implemented, and the pace of implementation. That said, we welcome the Government’s commitment to develop a new policy framework on separation and recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody …
Read more
We note the frustration of HM Inspectorate of Prisons about the extent to which its recommendations for action are implemented, and the pace of implementation. That said, we welcome the Government’s commitment to develop a new policy framework on separation and recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service set out when this piece of work will be completed and when the new framework will be implemented.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government expects the new consistent policy framework for separation across the youth secure estate to be published by August, with immediate implementation to follow.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
4
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
A significant proportion of children in custody have a mental health need. The Secure Stairs model is a welcome development, but we are disappointed to hear that children are sometimes held in custody because of an absence of appropriate mental health treatment beds. In cases where the mental health of …
Read more
A significant proportion of children in custody have a mental health need. The Secure Stairs model is a welcome development, but we are disappointed to hear that children are sometimes held in custody because of an absence of appropriate mental health treatment beds. In cases where the mental health of offenders is a substantial factor in their self-harm or their level of risk to staff or fellow offenders, we recommend that the Ministry work with the Department of Health and Social Care to identify mechanisms to ensure appropriate placement for individuals who require treatment and to make sure that young offenders are in the right place to receive the treatment they need.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines existing partnerships and mechanisms with NHSE&I to ensure appropriate placement and states that a revised procedure for transfers under the Mental Health Act will be published by NHSE&I in spring 2021, while committing to continued collaborative work.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
5
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
Self-harm across the youth secure estate is alarmingly high. There has been a welcome reduction in consecutive months since January, but self-harm is at the highest level in the last five years. The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service should set out what measures they have put in place …
Read more
Self-harm across the youth secure estate is alarmingly high. There has been a welcome reduction in consecutive months since January, but self-harm is at the highest level in the last five years. The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service should set out what measures they have put in place specifically to address self-harm.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government describes its existing multi-disciplinary approach within the Framework for Integrated Care, ongoing efforts to build staff skills, and monthly review of self-harm data using central management information to understand trends and prevent self-harm.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
6
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service must also seek to understand why self-harm appears to have reduced during the Covid-19 pandemic, and what can be learned from that.
Government response AI summary
The government agrees to understand why self-harm reduced and states it has commissioned a Covid-19 Research and Evaluation Programme, with the final report due in late spring 2021, to better understand these lessons.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
7
Conclusion
16th Report - Children and young people…
Acknowledged
Substantial concern has been expressed to us about use of force against children and young people across the youth custodial estate, and we note that sanctioned use of 42 Children and Young People in Custody (part 2): The Youth Secure Estate and Resettlement force has been rising. While there appear …
Read more
Substantial concern has been expressed to us about use of force against children and young people across the youth custodial estate, and we note that sanctioned use of 42 Children and Young People in Custody (part 2): The Youth Secure Estate and Resettlement force has been rising. While there appear to be sound monitoring and governance arrangements at some establishments, such as Parc and Oakhill, this does not appear to be the case for others, as highlighted by HMIP.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the increase in restrictive physical intervention, particularly for complex girls, and outlines ongoing efforts including a forthcoming Girls Strategy, improved data capture, the planned removal of pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR syllabus, and an independent review panel to scrutinise use of force.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
8
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and the Youth Custody Service set out the reasons why use of force is rising in youth custodial institutions and what steps are being taken to ensure that any such use is necessary and proportionate. We recommend that the Ministry and Youth Custody …
Read more
We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and the Youth Custody Service set out the reasons why use of force is rising in youth custodial institutions and what steps are being taken to ensure that any such use is necessary and proportionate. We recommend that the Ministry and Youth Custody Service conduct a light-touch review of monitoring and governance processes in place for use of force involving children and young people in all the institutions that hold them to establish that those processes are sufficiently robust.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explains the rise in use of force is partly due to complex girls and outlines steps including developing a Girls Strategy, improving data capture for different levels of force, planning the removal of pain-inducing techniques, and establishing an independent review panel for monthly …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
9
Conclusion
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
Techniques specifically designed to cause pain to children should never be used as routine methods of managing offenders. Any use of such techniques should always be a last resort in the interests of safety from physical harm. None the less, we acknowledge the views of both Peter Clarke and Charlie …
Read more
Techniques specifically designed to cause pain to children should never be used as routine methods of managing offenders. Any use of such techniques should always be a last resort in the interests of safety from physical harm. None the less, we acknowledge the views of both Peter Clarke and Charlie Taylor that in the real- life circumstances of a Youth Offender Institution or a Secure Training Centre, the safety of staff and of of offenders themselves may on rare occasion require direct and immediate physical force that may inflict pain.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it committed to removing pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR syllabus and aims to achieve this by the summer, supported by staff training for full implementation across all sites.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
10
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We welcome the Government’s commitment to remove pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR training manual and to focus it on behaviour management and restraint. We are disappointed that, six months after Charlie Taylor recommended this change, there is no indication of when it will happen. We recommend that the Ministry of …
Read more
We welcome the Government’s commitment to remove pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR training manual and to focus it on behaviour management and restraint. We are disappointed that, six months after Charlie Taylor recommended this change, there is no indication of when it will happen. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service remove pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR syllabus without further delay. The Ministry and Youth Custody Service should also set out a timeframe for conclusion of the review, redesign and delivery of the new syllabus. (Paragraph 68) Disproportionality in custody
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to removing pain-inducing techniques from the MMPR syllabus by the summer, stating that a review has concluded and mandatory refresher training has been updated to focus on de-escalation and behaviour management.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
11
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted in Part
We welcome the Ministry of Justice’s commitment to implement in full the remainder of David Lammy’s recommendations within the next 12 months. The Ministry should set out what resource has been allocated to this piece of work. We recommend that the response to this Report provide a full and detailed …
Read more
We welcome the Ministry of Justice’s commitment to implement in full the remainder of David Lammy’s recommendations within the next 12 months. The Ministry should set out what resource has been allocated to this piece of work. We recommend that the response to this Report provide a full and detailed timetable setting out how and by when those recommendations will be implemented. We recommend that that timetable be accompanied by an outline of how sufficient resources will be provided in the immediate and longer terms to ensure that disproportionality in the system is reduced now and remains so in future. (Paragraph 77) Youth Justice Reform
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights its commitment to the Lammy Review, detailing updates and launching the Race Action Programme with a 20-strong team and £100,000 in funding for BAME-led organizations, but does not provide the requested full and detailed timetable for implementation or a comprehensive outline of …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
12
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted in Part
We welcome development of the secure school model and agree with the Minister for Justice, Lucy Frazer QC MP, that this offers an opportunity to reform the existing estate to better meet the needs of the children it holds. It is disappointing that the timetable for opening has been subject …
Read more
We welcome development of the secure school model and agree with the Minister for Justice, Lucy Frazer QC MP, that this offers an opportunity to reform the existing estate to better meet the needs of the children it holds. It is disappointing that the timetable for opening has been subject to continued delays, with opening of the first school planned for 2020 now pushed back to 2022, five years after the original commitment to developing two secure schools. The Ministry of Justice should set out Children and Young People in Custody (part 2): The Youth Secure Estate and Resettlement 43 why the opening has been subject to repeated delays. We recommend that it guarantee that the first school will open as now planned in 2022, and set out what is being done to ensure that that opening is achieved on time.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explains delays are due to complex legal and regulatory issues for this innovative model, and outlines ongoing work like appointing a constructor and commencing renovation by the end of the year, but only states they "continue to work towards" the late 2022 opening …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
13
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Deferred
We welcome the Government’s long-term ambition to replace YOIs and STCs with secure schools, but we are concerned about the level of commitment demonstrated in achieving this aim, given the length of time it has taken to develop a single secure school. We recommend that the Ministry publish a timetable …
Read more
We welcome the Government’s long-term ambition to replace YOIs and STCs with secure schools, but we are concerned about the level of commitment demonstrated in achieving this aim, given the length of time it has taken to develop a single secure school. We recommend that the Ministry publish a timetable setting out how, where and when it plans to replace YOIs and STCs with secure schools and what resource has been allocated to ensure this commitment is achievable and is met.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government maintains its long-term ambition to replace YOIs and STCs with secure schools but states this will take time, and they will update the Committee on a timetable and further investment when more information is available.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
14
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We welcome the Government’s commitment to reform the rest of the estate, but we are concerned that the youth estate in its current form is not meeting the needs of the children being held. We have heard about high levels of violence and self- harm and about staffing issues. The …
Read more
We welcome the Government’s commitment to reform the rest of the estate, but we are concerned that the youth estate in its current form is not meeting the needs of the children being held. We have heard about high levels of violence and self- harm and about staffing issues. The Ministry of Justice should set out specifically what reforms to the existing estate have taken place since the Taylor Review and what reforms are in progress or due to commence and complete over the next two years, before the new secure school opens.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details reforms since the Taylor Review, including the introduction of Youth Justice Specialist roles with 201 officers qualified, ongoing refurbishments with in-room showers and technology, and £7m secured for youth secure estate maintenance in 2021/22.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
15
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We welcome the recent announcement that officers working in youth custody will become Youth Justice Specialists after completing degree-level training, but we remain concerned about staff turnover in the youth estate, and the effect that staffing difficulties have on day-to-day running of the secure estate. The Ministry of Justice should …
Read more
We welcome the recent announcement that officers working in youth custody will become Youth Justice Specialists after completing degree-level training, but we remain concerned about staff turnover in the youth estate, and the effect that staffing difficulties have on day-to-day running of the secure estate. The Ministry of Justice should set out its workforce strategy, specifically relating to staff in the youth custodial estate. We further recommend that the Ministry commission research into the reasons why staff turnover has been high. (Paragraph 99) Resettlement and Reoffending
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines its workforce strategy, highlighting the Youth Justice Specialist role with 201 qualified officers, and confirms an ongoing internal review into staff turnover in the youth secure estate, with a provisional reporting date of June 30, 2021.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
16
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Acknowledged
It is essential that children have access to appropriate Employment, Training and Education services when they leave custody, not least to reduce the risk and the rate of reoffending. The Ministry of Justice, Youth Custody Service and Youth Justice Board should continue to work together to ensure that all children …
Read more
It is essential that children have access to appropriate Employment, Training and Education services when they leave custody, not least to reduce the risk and the rate of reoffending. The Ministry of Justice, Youth Custody Service and Youth Justice Board should continue to work together to ensure that all children and young people have adequate access to education and purposeful activity while in custody and that meaningful opportunities continue through into the community.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government welcomes the recommendation and commits to continuing multi-agency working with the YCS and YJB, stating it is also working towards commissioning a new educational service for under-18 YOIs to improve learning outcomes.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
17
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
Collaboration between agencies is imperative if children’s resettlement needs are to be met during their time in custody and followed through to the community. We recognise that the quality and ease of collaboration between agencies may vary between establishments and areas, but it is sub-optimal that children may be subjected …
Read more
Collaboration between agencies is imperative if children’s resettlement needs are to be met during their time in custody and followed through to the community. We recognise that the quality and ease of collaboration between agencies may vary between establishments and areas, but it is sub-optimal that children may be subjected to a number of different, uncoordinated resettlement plans. The Ministry of Justice and Youth Custody Service should set out what work is being done to reduce duplication and ensure that children have a single coordinated resettlement plan.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges duplication and states they will foster multi-agency working and co-produce single, coordinated resettlement plans with children and young people following their Formulation, which is currently in the development stage.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
18
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Acknowledged
It is apparent that accommodation is a significant problem for some children being release from custody. It is unacceptable that a child should not know until the day of their release where they will live the day after. We agree with the recommendation made by HM Inspectorate of Prisons and …
Read more
It is apparent that accommodation is a significant problem for some children being release from custody. It is unacceptable that a child should not know until the day of their release where they will live the day after. We agree with the recommendation made by HM Inspectorate of Prisons and HM Inspectorate of Probation that the Ministry of Justice must develop a national accommodation strategy for children 44 Children and Young People in Custody (part 2): The Youth Secure Estate and Resettlement released from custody. We acknowledge the commitment made by the Minister of State to return to the Committee to report on progress made in these areas.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the importance of suitable accommodation and the need for collaborative work, stating it is currently exploring policy options through stakeholder engagement to address these issues.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
19
Conclusion
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
We welcome the work being done to improve transition planning, and we note that work is under way in the Ministry of Justice on how best to manage transition into adult custodial settings for those who turn 18. While cut-off points between youth and adult justice are necessary, we acknowledge …
Read more
We welcome the work being done to improve transition planning, and we note that work is under way in the Ministry of Justice on how best to manage transition into adult custodial settings for those who turn 18. While cut-off points between youth and adult justice are necessary, we acknowledge concerns, not least from Young Advisers with practical experience, that the simple change from being 17 to 18 may not denote full maturity in some young people who are in custody, and that the transition may prove to be what the Chief Inspector of Probation calls a ‘cliff edge’ for those individuals.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirms the Youth Custody Service is producing a 'Transitions of young people from youth to adult custody' Policy Framework, aiming to publish it later this year, and HMPPS is collaborating to improve the national transition process, with an ongoing pilot and interim oversight …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
20
Recommendation
16th Report - Children and young people…
Accepted
While some transition planning may take place before a young person leaves the youth estate, we are not convinced that the adult estate is sufficiently equipped to support all those who make that move. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice mandate appropriate transition planning in the over-18 estate for …
Read more
While some transition planning may take place before a young person leaves the youth estate, we are not convinced that the adult estate is sufficiently equipped to support all those who make that move. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice mandate appropriate transition planning in the over-18 estate for those coming from youth estate to ensure that those who do so do not find themselves on a ‘cliff edge’. We recommend that the Ministry of Justice set out when the ‘transition from youth to adult custody’ policy framework will be published and how it will be implemented across the youth and the adult estates. The Ministry should also update us on the practical steps being taken in the interim to ensure that those young people who do make that transition receive the support they need and avoid any drop-off in service provision and support. (Paragraph 134) Children and Young People in Custody (part 2): The Youth Secure Estate and Resettlement 45
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is producing a ‘Transitions of young people from youth to adult custody’ Policy Framework, aiming to publish it later this year with implementation details. It also details ongoing work with HMPPS, including a pilot program, and interim central oversight to support young people …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice