Source · Select Committees · Work and Pensions Committee

Sixth Report - The Health and Safety Executive’s approach to asbestos management

Work and Pensions Committee HC 560 Published 21 April 2022
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
27 items (10 recs)

No response data available yet.

Filter by:

Recommendations

10 results
2

We recommend that HSE and Government use the conclusions and recommendations from our report to...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE and Government use the conclusions and recommendations from our report to inform both its immediate post implementation review of the asbestos regulations and its longer-term approach to asbestos management. (Paragraph 15) The asbestos risk today Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
5

We recommend that HSE develops and implements a robust research framework for the systematic measurement...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE develops and implements a robust research framework for the systematic measurement of current asbestos exposures in non-domestic buildings, using a range of measurement and sampling techniques and informed by international experiences and approaches. It should ensure … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
10
Para 52

We recommend that a deadline now be set for the removal of asbestos from non-...

Recommendation
We recommend that a deadline now be set for the removal of asbestos from non- domestic buildings, within 40 years. The Government and HSE should develop and publish a strategic plan to achieve this, focusing on removing the highest risk … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
12
Para 63

We recommend HSE work with others in the UK and devolved governments to continue to...

Recommendation
We recommend HSE work with others in the UK and devolved governments to continue to review and share the evidence relating to routine, environmental, air monitoring of asbestos fibres. We ask that HSE writes to us in 12 months’ time … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
14
Para 67

We recommend that HSE strengthens its work with, and guidance to, dutyholders to make clear...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE strengthens its work with, and guidance to, dutyholders to make clear their obligations to communicate asbestos information and risks to building contractors and users. We also recommend that HSE works with others in Government to sponsor … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
16

We recommend that HSE works with others in government to develop a central digital register...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE works with others in government to develop a central digital register of asbestos in non-domestic buildings, describing its location and type. In the first instance, the concept of a central register could be tested using asbestos … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
18
Para 95

We recommend that HSE commits to a sustained increase in inspection and enforcement activity targeting...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE commits to a sustained increase in inspection and enforcement activity targeting compliance with the Control of Asbestos Regulations. Repeating our recommendation from June 2020, the Government and DWP should ensure that it provides adequate funding to … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
22
Para 112

We recommend that HSE considers how it could consolidate, tighten, and simplify the current categorisation...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE considers how it could consolidate, tighten, and simplify the current categorisation of asbestos works as part of its 2022 statutory review of the Control of Asbestos Regulations. Its review should carefully assess the net behavioural impacts … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
25
Para 122

We recommend that HSE makes it mandatory for all people conducting asbestos surveys to be...

Recommendation
We recommend that HSE makes it mandatory for all people conducting asbestos surveys to be accredited by a recognised accreditation body. We also recommend that HSE assesses the impact of making it a legal requirement for building owners or occupiers … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →
27

We recommend HSE ensures its current review of the Control of Asbestos Regulations includes a...

Recommendation
We recommend HSE ensures its current review of the Control of Asbestos Regulations includes a thorough written assessment of moves towards more stringent asbestos 52 The Health and Safety Executive’s approach to asbestos management occupational exposure limits in Europe. It … Read more
Department for Work and Pensions
View Details →

Conclusions (17)

Observations and findings
1 Conclusion
Para 14
Asbestos-related illness is one of the great workplace tragedies of modern times. Extensive use of asbestos in the twentieth century accounts for many thousands of deaths. The extreme exposures of the mid- to late twentieth century may be behind us, but its legacy lives on. Asbestos remains in many of …
View Details →
3 Conclusion
Para 29
Progress made since the gradual imposition of restrictions on the use of asbestos and its eventual ban in 1999 are no reason for complacency. Understanding the extent to which asbestos fibres are still being released from the fabric of buildings remains vital and requires different methods of analysis. Past measurement …
View Details →
4 Conclusion
Para 30
Recent HSE data on the relative risk of mesothelioma deaths shows elevated rates for women whose last occupation was education and teaching. However, limitations in death certificate information means that the earlier occupational history of these people—which may be key to understanding the cause of their disease—is not known. Moreover, …
View Details →
6 Conclusion
We also recommend that the Government investigates opportunities to improve the occupational information recorded on death certificates. (Paragraph 32) A strategic approach to asbestos management
View Details →
7 Conclusion
Para 49
Under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2012, asbestos-containing materials that are in good condition and are unlikely to be disturbed can be left in place by building dutyholders. Buildings containing asbestos will not last forever and, as HSE acknowledges, we do not know how long some of these materials, left …
View Details →
8 Conclusion
Para 50
Wholesale removal is not, however, without its own risk and uncertainty. Despite this, HSE has been slow to invest in research to better understand the costs and benefits of removal and to evaluate options for safer removal. This is becoming a more urgent task. The likely dramatic increase in retrofitting …
View Details →
9 Conclusion
Para 51
The Minister and HSE told us that their goal was to see asbestos gradually and safely removed from GB’s buildings. We agree with its ambition but greatly regret that neither HSE nor the Government has articulated a clear and comprehensive strategy for achieving this. There is no written down, fully …
View Details →
11 Conclusion
Para 62
We are unconvinced that a significant further expansion in the use of air monitoring for the routine measurement of asbestos fibres is needed. Clearly, such monitoring is an important component both in assessing sites following asbestos removal work The Health and Safety Executive’s approach to asbestos management 49 and, potentially, …
View Details →
13 Conclusion
Para 66
Information about asbestos within buildings is often poorly communicated to users and contractors by dutyholders. Surveys and management plans which include critical information on asbestos are not always maintained as living and accessible documents. Opportunities to exploit digital technologies to improve communications on asbestos risks are being missed.
View Details →
15 Conclusion
Para 82
Whether building dutyholders are complying with the requirements of the Control of Asbestos Regulations is largely unknown. HSE collects some data from its programme of inspections, but these cover a tiny fraction of the non- domestic premises that contain asbestos. HSE doubts whether a central register of information on asbestos …
View Details →
17 Conclusion
Para 94
HSE has experienced significant cuts in government funding. Lower grant funding has been partly mitigated by the introduction of its fee for intervention ‘cost recovery’ model but this cannot be used to target inspections of licensed asbestos removal work. It is not surprising, therefore, that HSE’s asbestos enforcement activity has …
View Details →
19 Conclusion
Para 101
HSE promotes understanding of the dangers of asbestos, technical knowledge exchange and compliance with the asbestos regulations through its participation in domestic and international networks. HSE has also previously invested in significant campaigns targeting those occupations most likely to be exposed to asbestos. Campaigns such as ‘Hidden Killer’ were widely …
View Details →
20 Conclusion
HSE should commit to investing more in sustained campaigning work across a range of media, using multiple interventions and synchronising with the development of its wider strategy for asbestos management. It should employ robust evaluation methods to test what messages and which methods achieve the greatest impact on the behaviours …
View Details →
21 Conclusion
Para 111
Currently in Great Britain, some asbestos removal work does not need to be undertaken by a licensed contractor but some of this will still need to be notified to HSE before work starts. The three-way categorisation of work is confusing and of questionable value. Reducing the number of categories and …
View Details →
23 Conclusion
Para 120
Asbestos surveyors have an important role in helping dutyholders to identify and manage asbestos in premises. We have heard concerns about the variable quality of surveys. It is not clear to us why the regulatory and quality requirements for asbestos surveyors should be less stringent than for analysts who must …
View Details →
24 Conclusion
Para 121
Despite their requirement to be accredited, the work of analysts continues to be compromised by regulatory arrangements which allow licensed asbestos contractors to commission their own analysts to check their work. We heard disturbing accounts from several sources that the current model undermines the independence of this critical quality check. …
View Details →
26 Conclusion
Para 127
HSE has an important role in monitoring international developments in approaches to managing asbestos risk, assessing the balance of evidence, and commissioning its own research to understand workplace patterns of asbestos exposure and behaviour. The direction of travel in Europe is towards tighter regulation of asbestos and lower exposure limits …
View Details →